Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CCEC vs TK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CCEC
Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$1.23B
5Y Perf.+151.4%
TK
Teekay Corporation

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • BM
Market Cap$1.18B
5Y Perf.+380.9%

CCEC vs TK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CCEC logoCCEC
TK logoTK
IndustryMarine ShippingOil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$1.23B$1.18B
Revenue (TTM)$573M$993M
Net Income (TTM)$246M$79M
Gross Margin56.2%28.1%
Operating Margin51.9%24.8%
Forward P/E10.3x64.0x
Total Debt$2.42B$66M
Cash & Equiv.$311M$685M

CCEC vs TKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CCEC
TK
StockMay 20May 26Return
Capital Clean Energ… (CCEC)100251.4+151.4%
Teekay Corporation (TK)100480.9+380.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CCEC vs TK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CCEC leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Teekay Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CCEC
Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.
The Defensive Pick

CCEC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.35, current ratio 1.44x
  • Lower P/E (10.3x vs 64.0x)
  • 43.0% margin vs TK's 7.9%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
TK
Teekay Corporation
The Income Pick

TK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 6.5%
  • Rev growth -16.7%, EPS growth -7.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.4%
  • 97.1% 10Y total return vs CCEC's 71.3%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTK logoTK-16.7% revenue growth vs CCEC's -44.9%
ValueCCEC logoCCECLower P/E (10.3x vs 64.0x)
Quality / MarginsCCEC logoCCEC43.0% margin vs TK's 7.9%
Stability / SafetyCCEC logoCCECBeta 0.35 vs TK's 0.38
DividendsTK logoTK6.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs CCEC's 0.8%
Momentum (1Y)TK logoTK+91.5% vs CCEC's +5.1%
Efficiency (ROA)CCEC logoCCEC6.0% ROA vs TK's 3.5%, ROIC 2.2% vs 19.1%

CCEC vs TK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CCECCapital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

TKTeekay Corporation
FY 2024
Voyage charters
87.4%$1.1B
Management fees and other
10.4%$127M
Time charters
2.1%$26M

CCEC vs TK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTKLAGGINGCCEC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CCEC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

TK is the larger business by revenue, generating $993M annually — 1.7x CCEC's $573M. CCEC is the more profitable business, keeping 43.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TK's 7.9%. On growth, TK holds the edge at -29.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCCEC logoCCECCapital Clean Ene…TK logoTKTeekay Corporation
RevenueTrailing 12 months$573M$993M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$443M$334M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$246M$79M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$746M$241M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+56.2%+28.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+51.9%+24.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+43.0%+7.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-130.2%+24.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-52.9%-29.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-71.6%-2.4%
CCEC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TK leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 9.9x trailing earnings, TK trades at a 56% valuation discount to CCEC's 22.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TK's 1.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CCEC's 20.6x.

MetricCCEC logoCCECCapital Clean Ene…TK logoTKTeekay Corporation
Market CapShares × price$1.2B$1.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.3B$565M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS22.41x9.92x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.27x64.05x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple20.56x1.23x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue6.02x0.97x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.83x0.68x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF3.02x
TK leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TK leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

CCEC delivers a 18.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $4 for TK. TK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CCEC's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TK scores 6/9 vs CCEC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricCCEC logoCCECCapital Clean Ene…TK logoTKTeekay Corporation
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+18.0%+4.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+6.0%+3.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.2%+19.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.8%+18.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.66x0.03x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$2.1B-$620M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$311M$685M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2.4B$66M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.33x69.29x
TK leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TK five years ago would be worth $51,229 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,538 for CCEC. Over the past 12 months, TK leads with a +91.5% total return vs CCEC's +5.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TK at 51.1% vs CCEC's 20.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCCEC logoCCECCapital Clean Ene…TK logoTKTeekay Corporation
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+1.4%+59.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+5.1%+91.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+74.4%+244.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+75.4%+412.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+71.3%+97.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+20.4%+51.1%
TK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CCEC and TK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CCEC is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TK's 0.38 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TK currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs CCEC's 82.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCCEC logoCCECCapital Clean Ene…TK logoTKTeekay Corporation
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.35x0.38x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$24.83$14.22
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$16.77$7.12
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+82.1%+99.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10049.460.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded8K513K
Evenly matched — CCEC and TK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

TK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates CCEC as "Buy" and TK as "Buy". For income investors, TK offers the higher dividend yield at 6.47% vs CCEC's 0.84%.

MetricCCEC logoCCECCapital Clean Ene…TK logoTKTeekay Corporation
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$23.67
# AnalystsCovering analysts114
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.8%+6.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises03
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.17$0.91
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+9.8%
TK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

TK leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CCEC leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.

Best OverallTeekay Corporation (TK)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CCEC vs TK: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CCEC or TK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Teekay Corporation (TK) is the stronger pick with -16.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -44. 9% for Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. (CCEC). Teekay Corporation (TK) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (64. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. (CCEC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CCEC or TK?

On trailing P/E, Teekay Corporation (TK) is the cheapest at 9.

9x versus Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. at 22. 4x. On forward P/E, Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. is actually cheaper at 10. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CCEC or TK?

Over the past 5 years, Teekay Corporation (TK) delivered a total return of +412.

3%, compared to +75. 4% for Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. (CCEC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TK returned +97. 1% versus CCEC's +71. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CCEC or TK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.

(CCEC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Teekay Corporation's 0. 38β — meaning TK is approximately 7% more volatile than CCEC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Corporation (TK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 166% for Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CCEC or TK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Teekay Corporation (TK) is pulling ahead at -16.

7% versus -44. 9% for Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. (CCEC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teekay Corporation grew EPS -7. 8% year-over-year, compared to -65. 0% for Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TK leads at 21. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CCEC or TK?

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.

(CCEC) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 3% net margin versus 11. 0% for Teekay Corporation — meaning it keeps 26. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCEC leads at 52. 3% versus 29. 9% for TK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCEC leads at 56. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CCEC or TK more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.

(CCEC) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 64. 0x for Teekay Corporation — 53. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CCEC or TK?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Teekay Corporation (TK) offers the highest yield at 6. 5%, versus 0. 8% for Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. (CCEC).

09

Is CCEC or TK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.

(CCEC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), 0. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CCEC: +71. 3%, TK: +97. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CCEC and TK?

These companies operate in different sectors (CCEC (Industrials) and TK (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CCEC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TK is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

CCEC

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 25%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TK

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CCEC and TK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CCEC: -52.9% · TK: -29.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(CCEC: 43.0% · TK: 7.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CCEC: 22.4x · TK: 9.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.