Medical - Care Facilities
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CCEL vs VCEL vs FATE vs NTLA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
CCEL vs VCEL vs FATE vs NTLA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $28M | $1.79B | $280M | $1.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $32M | $292M | $7M | $68M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $400K | $21M | $-136M | $-413M |
| Gross Margin | 77.1% | 74.8% | — | -25.6% |
| Operating Margin | 13.6% | 5.4% | -22.2% | -6.5% |
| Forward P/E | 69.0x | 80.9x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $13M | $98M | $78M | $93M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $561K | $100M | $47M | $155M |
CCEL vs VCEL vs FATE vs NTLA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cryo-Cell Internati… (CCEL) | 100 | 46.6 | -53.4% |
| Vericel Corporation (VCEL) | 100 | 244.3 | +144.3% |
| Fate Therapeutics, … (FATE) | 100 | 7.5 | -92.5% |
| Intellia Therapeuti… (NTLA) | 100 | 78.3 | -21.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCEL vs VCEL vs FATE vs NTLA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCEL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 7.1%
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.35 vs NTLA's 2.37
- 7.1% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
VCEL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 16.5%, EPS growth 60.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.9%
- 12.1% 10Y total return vs CCEL's 61.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.47, Low D/E 27.7%, current ratio 5.03x
- 7.3% margin vs FATE's -20.5%
FATE is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 2.17, current ratio 5.79x
- +143.0% vs CCEL's -26.1%
NTLA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 16.9% revenue growth vs FATE's -51.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.9% revenue growth vs FATE's -51.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.3% margin vs FATE's -20.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs NTLA's 2.37 | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +143.0% vs CCEL's -26.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.6% ROA vs NTLA's -45.2%, ROIC 2.5% vs -44.0% |
CCEL vs VCEL vs FATE vs NTLA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CCEL vs VCEL vs FATE vs NTLA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VCEL leads in 3 of 6 categories
CCEL leads 1 • FATE leads 0 • NTLA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VCEL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VCEL is the larger business by revenue, generating $292M annually — 43.9x FATE's $7M. VCEL is the more profitable business, keeping 7.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FATE's -20.5%. On growth, NTLA holds the edge at +78.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $32M | $292M | $7M | $68M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6M | $25M | -$148M | -$431M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $399,609 | $21M | -$136M | -$413M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6M | $58M | -$88M | -$396M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.1% | +74.8% | — | -25.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +5.4% | -22.2% | -6.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +7.3% | -20.5% | -6.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.1% | +19.8% | -13.2% | -5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | +30.1% | -26.4% | +78.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -30.8% | +47.8% | +38.6% | +34.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CCEL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 69.0x trailing earnings, CCEL trades at a 37% valuation discount to VCEL's 109.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CCEL's 10.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VCEL's 79.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $28M | $1.8B | $280M | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $40M | $1.8B | $312M | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 69.00x | 109.78x | -2.11x | -3.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 80.85x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.78x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.13x | 79.78x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.87x | 6.48x | 42.18x | 23.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 5.16x | 1.39x | 2.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.70x | 72.30x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
VCEL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VCEL delivers a 6.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-66 for FATE. NTLA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FATE's 0.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VCEL scores 8/9 vs FATE's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +6.4% | -65.8% | -56.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +4.6% | -42.7% | -45.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +2.5% | -36.5% | -44.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.3% | +2.7% | -43.1% | -48.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.28x | 0.38x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | -$2M | $31M | -$62M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $560,960 | $100M | $47M | $155M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $98M | $78M | $93M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.62x | 91.80x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VCEL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VCEL five years ago would be worth $6,672 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $318 for FATE. Over the past 12 months, FATE leads with a +143.0% total return vs CCEL's -26.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VCEL at 2.1% vs NTLA's -31.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.6% | -1.3% | +145.5% | +48.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.1% | -13.2% | +143.0% | +88.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.5% | +6.5% | -55.4% | -68.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.2% | -33.3% | -96.8% | -79.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.3% | +1205.9% | +40.5% | -42.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.4% | +2.1% | -23.6% | -31.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CCEL and FATE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CCEL is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NTLA's 2.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FATE currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs NTLA's 48.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.35x | 1.47x | 2.17x | 2.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.35 | $45.97 | $2.46 | $28.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.72 | $28.95 | $0.91 | $6.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.3% | +76.4% | +98.6% | +48.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.9 | 58.2 | 81.0 | 50.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12K | 626K | 1.9M | 5.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VCEL as "Buy", FATE as "Buy", NTLA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1525.5% upside for FATE (target: $40) vs 25.2% for VCEL (target: $44). CCEL is the only dividend payer here at 7.13% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $44.00 | $39.50 | $20.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 | 31 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.1% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.25 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
VCEL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CCEL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CCEL vs VCEL vs FATE vs NTLA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCEL or VCEL or FATE or NTLA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
(NTLA) is the stronger pick with 16. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -51. 2% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). Cryo-Cell International, Inc. (CCEL) offers the better valuation at 69. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vericel Corporation (VCEL) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CCEL or VCEL or FATE or NTLA?
On trailing P/E, Cryo-Cell International, Inc.
(CCEL) is the cheapest at 69. 0x versus Vericel Corporation at 109. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CCEL or VCEL or FATE or NTLA?
Over the past 5 years, Vericel Corporation (VCEL) delivered a total return of -33.
3%, compared to -96. 8% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VCEL returned +1206% versus NTLA's -42. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CCEL or VCEL or FATE or NTLA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cryo-Cell International, Inc.
(CCEL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 37β — meaning NTLA is approximately 573% more volatile than CCEL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 38% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CCEL or VCEL or FATE or NTLA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
(NTLA) is pulling ahead at 16. 9% versus -51. 2% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cryo-Cell International, Inc. grew EPS 104. 4% year-over-year, compared to 27. 4% for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VCEL leads at 18. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CCEL or VCEL or FATE or NTLA?
Vericel Corporation (VCEL) is the more profitable company, earning 6.
0% net margin versus -20. 5% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCEL leads at 10. 9% versus -22. 2% for FATE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTLA leads at 76. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CCEL or VCEL or FATE or NTLA more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FATE: 1525.
5% to $39. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CCEL or VCEL or FATE or NTLA?
In this comparison, CCEL (7.
1% yield) pays a dividend. VCEL, FATE, NTLA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CCEL or VCEL or FATE or NTLA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cryo-Cell International, Inc.
(CCEL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), 7. 1% yield). Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CCEL: +61. 3%, NTLA: -42. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CCEL and VCEL and FATE and NTLA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CCEL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; VCEL is a small-cap high-growth stock; FATE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NTLA is a small-cap high-growth stock. CCEL pays a dividend while VCEL, FATE, NTLA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.