Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CCGWW vs ACMR vs ICHR vs WDH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Insurance - Diversified
CCGWW vs ACMR vs ICHR vs WDH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Insurance - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $9M | $3.92B | $2.47B | $595M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.47B | $901M | $959M | $2.98B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-61M | $94M | $-51M | $447M |
| Gross Margin | 4.6% | 44.4% | 11.3% | 41.2% |
| Operating Margin | -1.9% | 12.1% | -3.8% | 8.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 29.7x | 62.2x | 8.8x |
| Total Debt | $35M | $303M | $186M | $244M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $117M | $766M | $98M | $986M |
CCGWW vs ACMR vs ICHR vs WDH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheche Group Inc. W… (CCGWW) | 100 | 10.5 | -89.5% |
| ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) | 100 | 321.0 | +221.0% |
| Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR) | 100 | 98.0 | -2.0% |
| Waterdrop Inc. (WDH) | 100 | 142.2 | +42.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCGWW vs ACMR vs ICHR vs WDH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCGWW lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ACMR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.2%, EPS growth -10.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.3%
- 30.7% 10Y total return vs ICHR's 6.3%
- 15.2% revenue growth vs CCGWW's 5.2%
- 0.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs WDH's 3.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
ICHR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +329.1% vs CCGWW's -19.8%
WDH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.22, yield 3.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.22, Low D/E 5.0%, current ratio 3.12x
- Beta 1.22, yield 3.9%, current ratio 3.12x
- Lower P/E (8.8x vs 62.2x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.2% revenue growth vs CCGWW's 5.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.8x vs 62.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.0% margin vs ICHR's -5.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.22 vs ICHR's 3.93, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs WDH's 3.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +329.1% vs CCGWW's -19.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.0% ROA vs CCGWW's -5.6%, ROIC 3.1% vs -22.8% |
CCGWW vs ACMR vs ICHR vs WDH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CCGWW vs ACMR vs ICHR vs WDH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WDH leads in 2 of 6 categories
ACMR leads 1 • CCGWW leads 0 • ICHR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WDH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCGWW is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.5B annually — 3.9x ACMR's $901M. WDH is the more profitable business, keeping 15.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ICHR's -5.3%. On growth, WDH holds the edge at +23.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.5B | $901M | $959M | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $126M | -$11M | $253M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $94M | -$51M | $447M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$69M | -$17M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.6% | +44.4% | +11.3% | +41.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.9% | +12.1% | -3.8% | +8.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.8% | +10.4% | -5.3% | +15.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | -7.6% | -1.7% | +7.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +9.4% | +4.7% | +23.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -76.1% | +46.2% | +66.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CCGWW and WDH each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.9x trailing earnings, WDH trades at a 75% valuation discount to ACMR's 43.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WDH's 17.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACMR's 27.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9M | $3.9B | $2.5B | $595M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$3M | $3.5B | $2.6B | $486M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 43.21x | -46.25x | 10.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 29.68x | 62.25x | 8.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.22x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 27.49x | — | 17.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 4.35x | 2.61x | 1.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.18x | 2.06x | 3.67x | 0.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 18.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WDH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WDH delivers a 9.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-17 for CCGWW. WDH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ICHR's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WDH scores 7/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -16.7% | +6.1% | -7.5% | +9.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.6% | +3.9% | -5.2% | +7.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -22.8% | +7.0% | -3.9% | +3.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.6% | +6.6% | -4.7% | +3.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.16x | 0.28x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$82M | -$463M | $87M | -$742M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $117M | $766M | $98M | $986M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $35M | $303M | $186M | $244M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -79.41x | 20.44x | -5.97x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACMR five years ago would be worth $23,344 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for CCGWW. Over the past 12 months, ICHR leads with a +329.1% total return vs CCGWW's -19.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACMR at 80.5% vs CCGWW's -55.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.2% | +31.9% | +249.0% | -14.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -19.8% | +195.6% | +329.1% | +29.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.3% | +487.9% | +151.1% | -40.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.3% | +133.4% | +28.9% | -82.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.3% | +3065.8% | +629.1% | -82.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -55.6% | +80.5% | +35.9% | -15.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ICHR and WDH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WDH is the less volatile stock with a 1.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICHR's 3.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ICHR currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs CCGWW's 42.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.38x | 3.24x | 3.93x | 1.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.05 | $71.65 | $72.87 | $2.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.02 | $19.26 | $13.12 | $1.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.0% | +82.6% | +97.7% | +73.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.1 | 60.7 | 66.9 | 34.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 1.2M | 795K | 207K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ACMR and WDH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACMR as "Buy", ICHR as "Buy", WDH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.0% upside for WDH (target: $2) vs -32.4% for ACMR (target: $40). For income investors, WDH offers the higher dividend yield at 3.92% vs ACMR's 0.19%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $40.00 | $49.80 | $2.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 14 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% | — | +3.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.11 | — | $0.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | +2.6% |
WDH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ACMR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
CCGWW vs ACMR vs ICHR vs WDH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCGWW or ACMR or ICHR or WDH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is the stronger pick with 15. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 2% for Cheche Group Inc. Warrant (CCGWW). Waterdrop Inc. (WDH) offers the better valuation at 10. 9x trailing P/E (8. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CCGWW or ACMR or ICHR or WDH?
On trailing P/E, Waterdrop Inc.
(WDH) is the cheapest at 10. 9x versus ACM Research, Inc. at 43. 2x. On forward P/E, Waterdrop Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CCGWW or ACMR or ICHR or WDH?
Over the past 5 years, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) delivered a total return of +133. 4%, compared to -91. 3% for Cheche Group Inc. Warrant (CCGWW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +30. 7% versus CCGWW's -91. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CCGWW or ACMR or ICHR or WDH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Waterdrop Inc.
(WDH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 22β versus Ichor Holdings, Ltd. 's 3. 93β — meaning ICHR is approximately 221% more volatile than WDH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Waterdrop Inc. (WDH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 28% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CCGWW or ACMR or ICHR or WDH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is pulling ahead at 15. 2% versus 5. 2% for Cheche Group Inc. Warrant (CCGWW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Waterdrop Inc. grew EPS 132. 6% year-over-year, compared to -140. 6% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACMR leads at 32. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CCGWW or ACMR or ICHR or WDH?
Waterdrop Inc.
(WDH) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 3% net margin versus -5. 6% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 13. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACMR leads at 12. 1% versus -4. 1% for ICHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WDH leads at 52. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CCGWW or ACMR or ICHR or WDH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Waterdrop Inc.
(WDH) trades at 8. 8x forward P/E versus 62. 2x for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — 53. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WDH: 25. 0% to $2. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CCGWW or ACMR or ICHR or WDH?
In this comparison, WDH (3.
9% yield), ACMR (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. CCGWW, ICHR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CCGWW or ACMR or ICHR or WDH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Waterdrop Inc.
(WDH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 22), 3. 9% yield). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) carries a higher beta of 3. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WDH: -82. 2%, ACMR: +30. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CCGWW and ACMR and ICHR and WDH?
These companies operate in different sectors (CCGWW (Technology) and ACMR (Technology) and ICHR (Technology) and WDH (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CCGWW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; ICHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WDH is a small-cap deep-value stock. WDH pays a dividend while CCGWW, ACMR, ICHR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.