Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CCO vs MGNI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Advertising Agencies
CCO vs MGNI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Advertising Agencies |
| Market Cap | $1.21B | $2.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.64B | $723M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-205M | $159M |
| Gross Margin | 39.3% | 63.4% |
| Operating Margin | 18.9% | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.4x |
| Total Debt | $6.47B | $279M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $190M | $553M |
CCO vs MGNI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clear Channel Outdo… (CCO) | 100 | 246.4 | +146.4% |
| Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) | 100 | 223.3 | +123.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCO vs MGNI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.31
- Lower volatility, beta 1.31, current ratio 1.28x
- Beta 1.31, current ratio 1.28x
MGNI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 493.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.4%
- -4.7% 10Y total return vs CCO's -43.7%
- 6.9% revenue growth vs CCO's 6.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.9% revenue growth vs CCO's 6.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.0% margin vs CCO's -12.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.31 vs MGNI's 1.63 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +116.4% vs MGNI's +12.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.3% ROA vs CCO's -5.4%, ROIC 9.5% vs 7.4% |
CCO vs MGNI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CCO vs MGNI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGNI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.6B annually — 2.3x MGNI's $723M. MGNI is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CCO's -12.5%. On growth, CCO holds the edge at +11.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $723M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $484M | $145M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$205M | $159M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $73M | $44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.3% | +63.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.9% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -12.5% | +22.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.4% | +6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.9% | +5.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -175.0% | +142.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CCO and MGNI each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MGNI's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CCO's 15.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.5B | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.33x | 14.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.63x | 11.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.76x | 2.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 37.88x | 12.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MGNI leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MGNI scores 6/9 vs CCO's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +18.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.4% | +5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.4% | +9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.0% | +7.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6.3B | -$275M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $190M | $553M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.5B | $279M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.13x | 4.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CCO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CCO five years ago would be worth $9,297 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,906 for MGNI. Over the past 12 months, CCO leads with a +116.4% total return vs MGNI's +12.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CCO at 23.6% vs MGNI's 16.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.3% | -12.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +116.4% | +12.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.9% | +58.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.0% | -60.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.7% | -4.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.6% | +16.7% |
Risk & Volatility
CCO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CCO is the less volatile stock with a 1.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MGNI's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CCO currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs MGNI's 52.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.31x | 1.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.43 | $26.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.00 | $10.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.9% | +52.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.5 | 55.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.0M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CCO as "Hold" and MGNI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 28.6% upside for MGNI (target: $18) vs -5.5% for CCO (target: $2).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.25 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.3% |
MGNI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CCO leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
CCO vs MGNI: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCO or MGNI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) is the stronger pick with 6. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 6% for Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (CCO). Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CCO or MGNI?
Over the past 5 years, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc.
(CCO) delivered a total return of -7. 0%, compared to -60. 9% for Magnite, Inc. (MGNI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MGNI returned -4. 7% versus CCO's -43. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CCO or MGNI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc.
(CCO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 31β versus Magnite, Inc. 's 1. 63β — meaning MGNI is approximately 25% more volatile than CCO relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — CCO or MGNI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) is pulling ahead at 6. 9% versus 6. 6% for Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (CCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Magnite, Inc. grew EPS 493. 8% year-over-year, compared to 43. 2% for Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MGNI leads at 7. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CCO or MGNI?
Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus -6. 5% for Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCO leads at 19. 0% versus 13. 7% for MGNI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MGNI leads at 62. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CCO or MGNI more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MGNI: 28.
6% to $18. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — CCO or MGNI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is CCO or MGNI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc.
(CCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CCO: -43. 7%, MGNI: -4. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CCO and MGNI?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MGNI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 5%
- Gross Margin > 23%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.