Residential Construction
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CCS vs MTH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Residential Construction
CCS vs MTH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Residential Construction | Residential Construction |
| Market Cap | $1.58B | $4.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.99B | $5.62B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $133M | $386M |
| Gross Margin | 18.4% | 18.6% |
| Operating Margin | 5.9% | 8.1% |
| Forward P/E | 14.4x | 12.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.44B | $1.89B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $158M | $775M |
CCS vs MTH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Century Communities… (CCS) | 100 | 183.7 | +83.7% |
| Meritage Homes Corp… (MTH) | 100 | 186.6 | +86.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCS vs MTH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -6.4%, EPS growth -53.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.0%
- -6.4% revenue growth vs MTH's -8.4%
- 2.1% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs MTH's 2.6%
MTH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.17, yield 2.6%
- 319.4% 10Y total return vs CCS's 238.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.17, Low D/E 36.4%, current ratio 12.12x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -6.4% revenue growth vs MTH's -8.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.9x vs 14.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.9% margin vs CCS's 3.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.17 vs CCS's 1.23, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs MTH's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +4.5% vs MTH's +0.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.0% ROA vs CCS's 2.9%, ROIC 6.6% vs 7.2% |
CCS vs MTH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CCS vs MTH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MTH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MTH and CCS operate at a comparable scale, with $5.6B and $4.0B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.9% (MTH) to 3.3% (CCS). On growth, CCS holds the edge at -12.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.0B | $5.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $258M | $479M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $133M | $386M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $132M | $238M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +18.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +8.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | +4.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.6% | -17.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.3% | -51.5% |
Valuation Metrics
CCS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.1x trailing earnings, MTH trades at a 9% valuation discount to CCS's 11.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CCS's 7.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MTH's 9.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $4.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.9B | $5.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.17x | 10.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.42x | 12.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.29x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.11x | 9.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.38x | 0.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.64x | 0.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.67x | 46.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CCS and MTH each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MTH delivers a 7.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $5 for CCS. MTH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CCS's 0.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CCS scores 5/9 vs MTH's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.2% | +7.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.9% | +5.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.2% | +6.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.8% | +7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.56x | 0.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $158M | $775M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.4B | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 815.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MTH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MTH five years ago would be worth $12,319 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,704 for CCS. Over the past 12 months, CCS leads with a +4.5% total return vs MTH's +0.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MTH at 2.7% vs CCS's -4.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.4% | -1.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.5% | +0.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.3% | +8.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.0% | +23.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +238.7% | +319.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.6% | +2.7% |
Risk & Volatility
MTH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MTH is the less volatile stock with a 1.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CCS's 1.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MTH currently trades 76.5% from its 52-week high vs CCS's 71.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.23x | 1.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $76.00 | $84.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $50.42 | $58.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.4% | +76.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.0 | 42.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 239K | 924K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CCS and MTH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CCS as "Buy" and MTH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 28.4% upside for MTH (target: $83) vs 11.8% for CCS (target: $61). For income investors, MTH offers the higher dividend yield at 2.64% vs CCS's 2.11%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $60.67 | $83.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.14 | $1.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.1% | +6.8% |
MTH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CCS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CCS vs MTH: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCS or MTH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Century Communities, Inc.
(CCS) is the stronger pick with -6. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 4% for Meritage Homes Corporation (MTH). Meritage Homes Corporation (MTH) offers the better valuation at 10. 1x trailing P/E (12. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Century Communities, Inc. (CCS) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CCS or MTH?
On trailing P/E, Meritage Homes Corporation (MTH) is the cheapest at 10.
1x versus Century Communities, Inc. at 11. 2x. On forward P/E, Meritage Homes Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CCS or MTH?
Over the past 5 years, Meritage Homes Corporation (MTH) delivered a total return of +23.
2%, compared to -23. 0% for Century Communities, Inc. (CCS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTH returned +319. 4% versus CCS's +238. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CCS or MTH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Meritage Homes Corporation (MTH) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
17β versus Century Communities, Inc. 's 1. 23β — meaning CCS is approximately 5% more volatile than MTH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Meritage Homes Corporation (MTH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 56% for Century Communities, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CCS or MTH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Century Communities, Inc.
(CCS) is pulling ahead at -6. 4% versus -8. 4% for Meritage Homes Corporation (MTH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Meritage Homes Corporation grew EPS -40. 3% year-over-year, compared to -53. 3% for Century Communities, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MTH leads at -2. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CCS or MTH?
Meritage Homes Corporation (MTH) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
7% net margin versus 3. 6% for Century Communities, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MTH leads at 9. 2% versus 9. 2% for CCS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCS leads at 21. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CCS or MTH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Meritage Homes Corporation (MTH) trades at 12.
9x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for Century Communities, Inc. — 1. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MTH: 28. 4% to $83. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — CCS or MTH?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Meritage Homes Corporation (MTH) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 2. 1% for Century Communities, Inc. (CCS).
09Is CCS or MTH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Meritage Homes Corporation (MTH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
17), 2. 6% yield, +319. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTH: +319. 4%, CCS: +238. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CCS and MTH?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.