Beverages - Alcoholic
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CCU vs ABEV vs BUD vs SAM vs TAP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Beverages - Alcoholic
Beverages - Alcoholic
Beverages - Alcoholic
Beverages - Alcoholic
CCU vs ABEV vs BUD vs SAM vs TAP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Beverages - Alcoholic | Beverages - Alcoholic | Beverages - Alcoholic | Beverages - Alcoholic | Beverages - Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $2.21B | $51.39B | $137.47B | $2.12B | $7.96B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.88T | $88.21B | $119.82B | $2.09B | $11.19B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $115.38B | $15.58B | $12.57B | $-61M | $-2.11B |
| Gross Margin | 44.4% | 51.5% | 55.2% | 45.2% | 37.8% |
| Operating Margin | 7.0% | 27.2% | 31.7% | -3.8% | -20.3% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 3.1x | 18.7x | 20.8x | 8.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.33T | $5.35B | $72.17B | $38M | $6.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $520.66B | $18.64B | $11.17B | $223M | $897M |
CCU vs ABEV vs BUD vs SAM vs TAP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compañía Cervecería… (CCU) | 100 | 85.2 | -14.8% |
| Ambev S.A. (ABEV) | 100 | 142.4 | +42.4% |
| Anheuser-Busch InBe… (BUD) | 100 | 170.4 | +70.4% |
| The Boston Beer Com… (SAM) | 100 | 34.9 | -65.1% |
| Molson Coors Bevera… (TAP) | 100 | 111.7 | +11.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCU vs ABEV vs BUD vs SAM vs TAP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.01 vs ABEV's 0.47
- Lower P/E (0.0x vs 20.8x)
ABEV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -13.8% 10Y total return vs SAM's 28.4%
- 17.7% margin vs TAP's -18.9%
- 8.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs TAP's 4.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +37.2% vs SAM's -19.4%
Among these 5 stocks, BUD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SAM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 3.7%, EPS growth 95.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.31, Low D/E 4.5%, current ratio 1.65x
- 3.7% revenue growth vs CCU's -4.7%
TAP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.02, yield 4.5%
- Beta 0.02, yield 4.5%, current ratio 0.55x
- Beta 0.02 vs CCU's 0.87, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.7% revenue growth vs CCU's -4.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 20.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.7% margin vs TAP's -18.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs CCU's 0.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 8.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs TAP's 4.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.2% vs SAM's -19.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.9% ROA vs TAP's -8.9%, ROIC 22.3% vs -10.1% |
CCU vs ABEV vs BUD vs SAM vs TAP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CCU vs ABEV vs BUD vs SAM vs TAP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ABEV leads in 2 of 6 categories
BUD leads 1 • CCU leads 0 • SAM leads 0 • TAP leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BUD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCU is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.88T annually — 1375.8x SAM's $2.1B. ABEV is the more profitable business, keeping 17.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TAP's -18.9%. On growth, TAP holds the edge at +2.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.88T | $88.2B | $119.8B | $2.1B | $11.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $272.7B | $30.7B | $38.8B | $14M | -$1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $115.4B | $15.6B | $12.6B | -$61M | -$2.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $117.1B | $22.2B | $32.2B | $191M | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.4% | +51.5% | +55.2% | +45.2% | +37.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.0% | +27.2% | +31.7% | -3.8% | -20.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | +17.7% | +10.5% | -2.9% | -18.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.1% | +25.1% | +26.9% | +9.1% | +10.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.7% | -0.1% | +0.4% | +1.7% | +2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.9% | +4.3% | +32.3% | -7.4% | +35.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CCU and TAP each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.5x trailing earnings, ABEV trades at a 41% valuation discount to BUD's 27.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ABEV offers better value at 2.50x vs CCU's 5.70x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $51.4B | $137.5B | $2.1B | $8.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $48.7B | $198.5B | $1.9B | $13.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.57x | 16.47x | 27.93x | 19.95x | -3.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.02x | 3.09x | 18.69x | 20.77x | 8.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 5.70x | 2.50x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.90x | 8.28x | 9.44x | 8.21x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.71x | 2.89x | 2.30x | 1.01x | 0.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.21x | 2.88x | 1.84x | 2.47x | 0.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.39x | 12.82x | 12.28x | 9.82x | 7.46x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ABEV leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABEV delivers a 17.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-19 for TAP. SAM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CCU's 0.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BUD scores 9/9 vs TAP's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.1% | +17.0% | +13.8% | -7.3% | -18.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | +10.9% | +6.0% | -5.0% | -8.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.3% | +22.3% | +7.5% | +15.5% | -10.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.7% | +20.7% | +8.7% | +14.8% | -11.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.82x | 0.06x | 0.81x | 0.04x | 0.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $806.9B | -$13.3B | $61.0B | -$186M | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $520.7B | $18.6B | $11.2B | $223M | $897M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.33T | $5.3B | $72.2B | $38M | $6.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.65x | 8.09x | 2.53x | — | -9.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ABEV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ABEV five years ago would be worth $12,334 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,736 for SAM. Over the past 12 months, ABEV leads with a +37.2% total return vs SAM's -19.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ABEV at 9.2% vs SAM's -14.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.4% | +33.2% | +27.2% | -1.3% | -9.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.3% | +37.2% | +21.2% | -19.4% | -18.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.1% | +30.4% | +28.7% | -36.8% | -25.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.9% | +23.3% | +13.0% | -82.6% | -15.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.8% | -13.8% | -23.9% | +28.4% | -42.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.4% | +9.2% | +8.8% | -14.2% | -9.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BUD and TAP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TAP is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CCU's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BUD currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs TAP's 73.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 0.54x | 0.33x | 0.31x | 0.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.36 | $3.45 | $82.91 | $264.46 | $57.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.71 | $2.10 | $56.97 | $185.34 | $40.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.7% | +95.4% | +96.4% | +74.6% | +73.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.4 | 61.8 | 64.2 | 27.1 | 49.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 198K | 25.3M | 2.0M | 199K | 2.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ABEV and TAP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CCU as "Hold", ABEV as "Hold", BUD as "Buy", SAM as "Hold", TAP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.5% upside for SAM (target: $240) vs -8.5% for ABEV (target: $3). For income investors, ABEV offers the higher dividend yield at 8.00% vs BUD's 1.64%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.01 | $89.00 | $239.78 | $47.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 14 | 45 | 31 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.8% | +8.0% | +1.6% | — | +4.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $403.10 | $1.30 | $1.31 | — | $1.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.7% | +9.7% | +8.1% |
ABEV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). BUD leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.
CCU vs ABEV vs BUD vs SAM vs TAP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCU or ABEV or BUD or SAM or TAP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Boston Beer Company, Inc.
(SAM) is the stronger pick with 3. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 7% for Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S. A. (CCU). Ambev S. A. (ABEV) offers the better valuation at 16. 5x trailing P/E (3. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) a "Buy" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CCU or ABEV or BUD or SAM or TAP?
On trailing P/E, Ambev S.
A. (ABEV) is the cheapest at 16. 5x versus Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV at 27. 9x. On forward P/E, Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S. A. is actually cheaper at 0. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S. A. wins at 0. 01x versus Ambev S. A. 's 0. 47x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CCU or ABEV or BUD or SAM or TAP?
Over the past 5 years, Ambev S.
A. (ABEV) delivered a total return of +23. 3%, compared to -82. 6% for The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SAM returned +28. 4% versus TAP's -42. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CCU or ABEV or BUD or SAM or TAP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
02β versus Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S. A. 's 0. 87β — meaning CCU is approximately 3858% more volatile than TAP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 82% for Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CCU or ABEV or BUD or SAM or TAP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Boston Beer Company, Inc.
(SAM) is pulling ahead at 3. 7% versus -4. 7% for Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S. A. (CCU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Boston Beer Company, Inc. grew EPS 95. 5% year-over-year, compared to -302. 8% for Molson Coors Beverage Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, ABEV leads at 3. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CCU or ABEV or BUD or SAM or TAP?
Ambev S.
A. (ABEV) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 6% net margin versus -19. 2% for Molson Coors Beverage Company — meaning it keeps 17. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BUD leads at 25. 9% versus -21. 0% for TAP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BUD leads at 55. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CCU or ABEV or BUD or SAM or TAP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S. A. (CCU) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 01x versus Ambev S. A. 's 0. 47x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S. A. (CCU) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 20. 8x for The Boston Beer Company, Inc. — 20. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SAM: 21. 5% to $239. 78.
08Which pays a better dividend — CCU or ABEV or BUD or SAM or TAP?
In this comparison, ABEV (8.
0% yield), TAP (4. 5% yield), CCU (3. 8% yield), BUD (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. SAM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CCU or ABEV or BUD or SAM or TAP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
02), 4. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TAP: -42. 1%, CCU: -9. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CCU and ABEV and BUD and SAM and TAP?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CCU is a small-cap deep-value stock; ABEV is a mid-cap deep-value stock; BUD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SAM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TAP is a small-cap income-oriented stock. CCU, ABEV, BUD, TAP pay a dividend while SAM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.