Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CCU vs TAP vs BUD vs SAM vs STZ

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CCU
Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S.A.

Beverages - Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • CL
Market Cap$2.21B
5Y Perf.-14.8%
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage Company

Beverages - Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$7.96B
5Y Perf.+11.7%
BUD
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV

Beverages - Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • BE
Market Cap$137.47B
5Y Perf.+70.4%
SAM
The Boston Beer Company, Inc.

Beverages - Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.12B
5Y Perf.-65.1%
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.

Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$25.70B
5Y Perf.-14.2%

CCU vs TAP vs BUD vs SAM vs STZ — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CCU logoCCU
TAP logoTAP
BUD logoBUD
SAM logoSAM
STZ logoSTZ
IndustryBeverages - AlcoholicBeverages - AlcoholicBeverages - AlcoholicBeverages - AlcoholicBeverages - Wineries & Distilleries
Market Cap$2.21B$7.96B$137.47B$2.12B$25.70B
Revenue (TTM)$2.88T$11.19B$119.82B$2.09B$9.38B
Net Income (TTM)$115.38B$-2.11B$12.57B$-61M$1.11B
Gross Margin44.4%37.8%55.2%45.2%52.0%
Operating Margin7.0%-20.3%31.7%-3.8%34.5%
Forward P/E0.0x8.9x18.7x20.8x12.5x
Total Debt$1.33T$6.30B$72.17B$38M$12.11B
Cash & Equiv.$520.66B$897M$11.17B$223M$68M

CCU vs TAP vs BUD vs SAM vs STZLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CCU
TAP
BUD
SAM
STZ
StockMay 20May 26Return
Compañía Cervecería… (CCU)10085.2-14.8%
Molson Coors Bevera… (TAP)100111.7+11.7%
Anheuser-Busch InBe… (BUD)100170.4+70.4%
The Boston Beer Com… (SAM)10034.9-65.1%
Constellation Brand… (STZ)10085.8-14.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CCU vs TAP vs BUD vs SAM vs STZ

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TAP and BUD are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment and operational efficiency and capital deployment. CCU, SAM, and STZ also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CCU
Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S.A.
The Value Play

CCU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (0.0x vs 12.5x)
Best for: value
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage Company
The Income Pick

TAP has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.02, yield 4.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 59.8%, current ratio 0.55x
  • Beta 0.02, yield 4.5%, current ratio 0.55x
  • Beta 0.02 vs CCU's 0.87, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
BUD
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV
The Momentum Pick

BUD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum and efficiency is your priority.

  • +21.2% vs STZ's -20.4%
  • 6.0% ROA vs TAP's -8.9%, ROIC 7.5% vs -10.1%
Best for: momentum and efficiency
SAM
The Boston Beer Company, Inc.
The Growth Play

SAM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 3.7%, EPS growth 95.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.0%
  • 28.4% 10Y total return vs BUD's -23.9%
  • 3.7% revenue growth vs CCU's -4.7%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

STZ is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.

  • 11.8% margin vs TAP's -18.9%
Best for: quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSAM logoSAM3.7% revenue growth vs CCU's -4.7%
ValueCCU logoCCULower P/E (0.0x vs 12.5x)
Quality / MarginsSTZ logoSTZ11.8% margin vs TAP's -18.9%
Stability / SafetyTAP logoTAPBeta 0.02 vs CCU's 0.87, lower leverage
DividendsTAP logoTAP4.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs CCU's 3.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)BUD logoBUD+21.2% vs STZ's -20.4%
Efficiency (ROA)BUD logoBUD6.0% ROA vs TAP's -8.9%, ROIC 7.5% vs -10.1%

CCU vs TAP vs BUD vs SAM vs STZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CCUCompañía Cervecerías Unidas S.A.
FY 2022
Alcoholic business
67.1%$1.82T
Non-alcoholic business
30.9%$838.4B
Other business
2.0%$54.2B
TAPMolson Coors Beverage Company

Segment breakdown not available.

BUDAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV
FY 2020
transportation services, lease agreements and advertising services
100.0%$13M
SAMThe Boston Beer Company, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

STZConstellation Brands, Inc.
FY 2025
Beer
83.7%$8.5B
ConstellationWinesAndSpirits
16.3%$1.7B

CCU vs TAP vs BUD vs SAM vs STZ — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCCULAGGINGSTZ

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — TAP and BUD and STZ each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

CCU is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.88T annually — 1375.8x SAM's $2.1B. STZ is the more profitable business, keeping 11.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TAP's -18.9%. On growth, TAP holds the edge at +2.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCCU logoCCUCompañía Cervecer…TAP logoTAPMolson Coors Beve…BUD logoBUDAnheuser-Busch In…SAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…STZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.88T$11.2B$119.8B$2.1B$9.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$272.7B-$1.5B$38.8B$14M$3.7B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$115.4B-$2.1B$12.6B-$61M$1.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$117.1B$1.2B$32.2B$191M$1.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+44.4%+37.8%+55.2%+45.2%+52.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+7.0%-20.3%+31.7%-3.8%+34.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+4.0%-18.9%+10.5%-2.9%+11.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+4.1%+10.4%+26.9%+9.1%+18.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-14.7%+2.0%+0.4%+1.7%-9.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-27.9%+35.6%+32.3%-7.4%-15.0%
Evenly matched — TAP and BUD and STZ each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CCU leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 17.6x trailing earnings, CCU trades at a 37% valuation discount to BUD's 27.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CCU's 7.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BUD's 9.4x.

MetricCCU logoCCUCompañía Cervecer…TAP logoTAPMolson Coors Beve…BUD logoBUDAnheuser-Busch In…SAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…STZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…
Market CapShares × price$2.2B$8.0B$137.5B$2.1B$25.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.1B$13.4B$198.5B$1.9B$37.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS17.57x-3.91x27.93x19.95x-329.36x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.0.02x8.95x18.69x20.77x12.53x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate5.70x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.90x9.44x8.21x9.28x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.71x0.71x2.30x1.01x2.52x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.21x0.79x1.84x2.47x3.77x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF21.39x7.46x12.28x9.82x13.26x
CCU leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SAM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

STZ delivers a 13.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-19 for TAP. SAM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STZ's 1.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BUD scores 9/9 vs TAP's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCCU logoCCUCompañía Cervecer…TAP logoTAPMolson Coors Beve…BUD logoBUDAnheuser-Busch In…SAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…STZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.1%-18.6%+13.8%-7.3%+13.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.1%-8.9%+6.0%-5.0%+5.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.3%-10.1%+7.5%+15.5%+13.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.7%-11.6%+8.7%+14.8%+18.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–964975
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.82x0.60x0.81x0.04x1.70x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$806.9B$5.4B$61.0B-$186M$12.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$520.7B$897M$11.2B$223M$68M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.33T$6.3B$72.2B$38M$12.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.65x-9.99x2.53x5.47x
SAM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BUD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BUD five years ago would be worth $11,300 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,736 for SAM. Over the past 12 months, BUD leads with a +21.2% total return vs STZ's -20.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BUD at 8.8% vs SAM's -14.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCCU logoCCUCompañía Cervecer…TAP logoTAPMolson Coors Beve…BUD logoBUDAnheuser-Busch In…SAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…STZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-4.4%-9.5%+27.2%-1.3%+6.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-17.3%-18.4%+21.2%-19.4%-20.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-23.1%-25.9%+28.7%-36.8%-29.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-15.9%-15.4%+13.0%-82.6%-30.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-9.8%-42.1%-23.9%+28.4%+11.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-8.4%-9.5%+8.8%-14.2%-11.2%
BUD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TAP and BUD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

TAP is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CCU's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BUD currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs TAP's 73.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCCU logoCCUCompañía Cervecer…TAP logoTAPMolson Coors Beve…BUD logoBUDAnheuser-Busch In…SAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…STZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.87x0.02x0.33x0.31x0.28x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$15.36$57.57$82.91$264.46$196.91
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$10.71$40.64$56.97$185.34$126.45
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+77.7%+73.7%+96.4%+74.6%+75.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.449.564.227.143.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded198K2.9M2.0M199K1.8M
Evenly matched — TAP and BUD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

TAP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CCU as "Hold", TAP as "Hold", BUD as "Buy", SAM as "Hold", STZ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.5% upside for SAM (target: $240) vs 10.8% for TAP (target: $47). For income investors, TAP offers the higher dividend yield at 4.53% vs BUD's 1.64%.

MetricCCU logoCCUCompañía Cervecer…TAP logoTAPMolson Coors Beve…BUD logoBUDAnheuser-Busch In…SAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…STZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$47.00$89.00$239.78$175.70
# AnalystsCovering analysts737453146
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.8%+4.5%+1.6%+2.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises05004
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$403.10$1.92$1.31$4.03
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+8.1%+0.7%+9.7%+4.4%
TAP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CCU leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). SAM leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallCompañía Cervecerías Unidas… (CCU)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CCU vs TAP vs BUD vs SAM vs STZ: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CCU or TAP or BUD or SAM or STZ a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The Boston Beer Company, Inc.

(SAM) is the stronger pick with 3. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 7% for Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S. A. (CCU). Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S. A. (CCU) offers the better valuation at 17. 6x trailing P/E (0. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) a "Buy" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CCU or TAP or BUD or SAM or STZ?

On trailing P/E, Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S.

A. (CCU) is the cheapest at 17. 6x versus Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV at 27. 9x. On forward P/E, Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S. A. is actually cheaper at 0. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CCU or TAP or BUD or SAM or STZ?

Over the past 5 years, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) delivered a total return of +13.

0%, compared to -82. 6% for The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SAM returned +28. 4% versus TAP's -42. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CCU or TAP or BUD or SAM or STZ?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

02β versus Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S. A. 's 0. 87β — meaning CCU is approximately 3858% more volatile than TAP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 170% for Constellation Brands, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CCU or TAP or BUD or SAM or STZ?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Boston Beer Company, Inc.

(SAM) is pulling ahead at 3. 7% versus -4. 7% for Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S. A. (CCU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Boston Beer Company, Inc. grew EPS 95. 5% year-over-year, compared to -302. 8% for Molson Coors Beverage Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, STZ leads at 5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CCU or TAP or BUD or SAM or STZ?

Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) is the more profitable company, earning 9.

8% net margin versus -19. 2% for Molson Coors Beverage Company — meaning it keeps 9. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STZ leads at 35. 5% versus -21. 0% for TAP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BUD leads at 55. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CCU or TAP or BUD or SAM or STZ more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S.

A. (CCU) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 20. 8x for The Boston Beer Company, Inc. — 20. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SAM: 21. 5% to $239. 78.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CCU or TAP or BUD or SAM or STZ?

In this comparison, TAP (4.

5% yield), CCU (3. 8% yield), STZ (2. 7% yield), BUD (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. SAM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CCU or TAP or BUD or SAM or STZ better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

02), 4. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TAP: -42. 1%, CCU: -9. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CCU and TAP and BUD and SAM and STZ?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CCU is a small-cap deep-value stock; TAP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BUD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SAM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; STZ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CCU, TAP, BUD, STZ pay a dividend while SAM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CCU

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 26%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TAP

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 22%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BUD

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SAM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 27%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

STZ

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CCU and TAP and BUD and SAM and STZ on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CCU: -14.7% · TAP: 2.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.