Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CDRE vs CODI vs SWBI vs KKR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Conglomerates
Aerospace & Defense
Asset Management
CDRE vs CODI vs SWBI vs KKR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Conglomerates | Aerospace & Defense | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $1.26B | $939M | $647M | $91.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $610M | $1.85B | $486M | $19.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $44M | $-227M | $12M | $2.37B |
| Gross Margin | 42.5% | 43.7% | 26.4% | 41.8% |
| Operating Margin | 12.3% | 1.4% | 4.6% | 2.4% |
| Forward P/E | 24.2x | 97.9x | 52.9x | 16.9x |
| Total Debt | $322M | $1.88B | $115M | $54.77B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $123M | $68M | $25M | $6M |
CDRE vs CODI vs SWBI vs KKR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cadre Holdings, Inc. (CDRE) | 100 | 147.3 | +47.3% |
| Compass Diversified (CODI) | 100 | 43.3 | -56.7% |
| Smith & Wesson Bran… (SWBI) | 100 | 63.9 | -36.1% |
| KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) | 100 | 137.7 | +37.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CDRE vs CODI vs SWBI vs KKR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CDRE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 7.5%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.1%
- 7.5% revenue growth vs SWBI's -11.4%
- 5.9% ROA vs CODI's -7.3%, ROIC 11.9% vs 1.0%
CODI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and momentum is your priority.
- 4.0% yield, vs KKR's 0.8%
- +90.5% vs CDRE's -17.1%
SWBI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 3.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.70, Low D/E 30.8%, current ratio 4.16x
- Beta 0.70, yield 3.6%, current ratio 4.16x
- Beta 0.70 vs KKR's 1.66, lower leverage
KKR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.3% 10Y total return vs CDRE's 106.0%
- Lower P/E (16.9x vs 52.9x)
- 12.3% margin vs CODI's -12.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.5% revenue growth vs SWBI's -11.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.9x vs 52.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.3% margin vs CODI's -12.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs KKR's 1.66, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, vs KKR's 0.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +90.5% vs CDRE's -17.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.9% ROA vs CODI's -7.3%, ROIC 11.9% vs 1.0% |
CDRE vs CODI vs SWBI vs KKR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CDRE vs CODI vs SWBI vs KKR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KKR leads in 2 of 6 categories
CDRE leads 1 • CODI leads 0 • SWBI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SWBI and KKR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KKR is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.3B annually — 39.6x SWBI's $486M. KKR is the more profitable business, keeping 12.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CODI's -12.3%. On growth, SWBI holds the edge at +17.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $610M | $1.8B | $486M | $19.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $94M | $164M | $30M | $9.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $44M | -$227M | $12M | $2.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $57M | $10M | $73M | $7.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.5% | +43.7% | +26.4% | +41.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +1.4% | +4.6% | +2.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.2% | -12.3% | +2.5% | +12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +0.5% | +15.0% | +49.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.0% | -5.9% | +17.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.6% | -5.1% | +122.4% | -1.7% |
Valuation Metrics
KKR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.3x trailing earnings, CDRE trades at a 40% valuation discount to SWBI's 48.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SWBI's 13.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KKR's 20.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $939M | $647M | $91.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $2.7B | $736M | $146.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 29.26x | -4.09x | 48.47x | 43.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.15x | 97.88x | 52.87x | 16.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.51x | 15.18x | 13.21x | 20.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.06x | 0.50x | 1.36x | 4.75x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.08x | 1.64x | 1.73x | 1.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.14x | — | — | 9.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CDRE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CDRE delivers a 13.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-50 for CODI. SWBI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CODI's 3.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KKR scores 6/9 vs SWBI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.5% | -49.6% | +3.3% | +3.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.9% | -7.3% | +2.2% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.9% | +1.0% | +4.1% | +0.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.3% | +2.4% | +4.9% | +0.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.01x | 3.27x | 0.31x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $199M | $1.8B | $90M | $54.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $123M | $68M | $25M | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $322M | $1.9B | $115M | $54.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.34x | -0.63x | 5.17x | 3.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KKR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CDRE five years ago would be worth $20,602 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,634 for CODI. Over the past 12 months, CODI leads with a +90.5% total return vs CDRE's -17.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KKR at 28.5% vs CODI's -8.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -26.9% | +168.4% | +47.0% | -20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.1% | +90.5% | +59.9% | -13.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.1% | -23.3% | +34.8% | +112.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.0% | -33.7% | -14.0% | +85.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.0% | +56.5% | -4.7% | +732.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.2% | -8.4% | +10.5% | +28.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CODI and SWBI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SWBI is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KKR's 1.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CODI currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs CDRE's 61.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.47x | 1.28x | 0.70x | 1.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.76 | $12.64 | $15.79 | $153.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.33 | $4.58 | $7.73 | $82.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.2% | +98.7% | +92.1% | +66.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.9 | 73.8 | 48.2 | 51.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 419K | 1.2M | 597K | 6.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CODI and KKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CDRE as "Buy", CODI as "Hold", SWBI as "Buy", KKR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 72.5% upside for CDRE (target: $52) vs 4.9% for SWBI (target: $15). For income investors, CODI offers the higher dividend yield at 4.01% vs KKR's 0.78%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $51.50 | $15.00 | $15.25 | $141.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 14 | 4 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +4.0% | +3.6% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.36 | $0.50 | $0.52 | $0.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | +3.9% | +0.1% |
KKR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). CDRE leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
CDRE vs CODI vs SWBI vs KKR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CDRE or CODI or SWBI or KKR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cadre Holdings, Inc.
(CDRE) is the stronger pick with 7. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 4% for Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI). Cadre Holdings, Inc. (CDRE) offers the better valuation at 29. 3x trailing P/E (24. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cadre Holdings, Inc. (CDRE) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CDRE or CODI or SWBI or KKR?
On trailing P/E, Cadre Holdings, Inc.
(CDRE) is the cheapest at 29. 3x versus Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. at 48. 5x. On forward P/E, KKR & Co. Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CDRE or CODI or SWBI or KKR?
Over the past 5 years, Cadre Holdings, Inc.
(CDRE) delivered a total return of +106. 0%, compared to -33. 7% for Compass Diversified (CODI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KKR returned +732. 3% versus SWBI's -4. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CDRE or CODI or SWBI or KKR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.
(SWBI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 70β versus KKR & Co. Inc. 's 1. 66β — meaning KKR is approximately 137% more volatile than SWBI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 3% for Compass Diversified — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CDRE or CODI or SWBI or KKR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cadre Holdings, Inc.
(CDRE) is pulling ahead at 7. 5% versus -11. 4% for Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cadre Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 13. 3% year-over-year, compared to -1426. 1% for Compass Diversified. Over a 3-year CAGR, CDRE leads at 10. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CDRE or CODI or SWBI or KKR?
KKR & Co.
Inc. (KKR) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 3% net margin versus -12. 2% for Compass Diversified — meaning it keeps 12. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CDRE leads at 12. 3% versus 2. 3% for CODI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CDRE leads at 42. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CDRE or CODI or SWBI or KKR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, KKR & Co.
Inc. (KKR) trades at 16. 9x forward P/E versus 97. 9x for Compass Diversified — 81. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CDRE: 72. 5% to $51. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CDRE or CODI or SWBI or KKR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Compass Diversified (CODI) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 0. 8% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR).
09Is CDRE or CODI or SWBI or KKR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.
(SWBI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 70), 3. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SWBI: -4. 7%, CDRE: +106. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CDRE and CODI and SWBI and KKR?
These companies operate in different sectors (CDRE (Industrials) and CODI (Industrials) and SWBI (Industrials) and KKR (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CDRE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CODI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SWBI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.