Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CELC vs PMVP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
CELC vs PMVP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $5.66B | $75M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-163M | $-83M |
| Total Debt | $98M | $1M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23M | $41M |
CELC vs PMVP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Celcuity Inc. (CELC) | 100 | 2253.6 | +2153.6% |
| PMV Pharmaceuticals… (PMVP) | 100 | 4.0 | -96.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CELC vs PMVP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CELC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 8.1% 10Y total return vs PMVP's -96.2%
- +11.8% vs PMVP's +59.6%
PMVP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.76
- EPS growth 21.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 12.22x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -65.1% revenue growth vs CELC's -73.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.6% margin vs CELC's 0.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs CELC's 1.71, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +11.8% vs PMVP's +59.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -51.0% ROA vs CELC's -58.0%, ROIC -38.0% vs -50.3% |
CELC vs PMVP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PMVP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CELC and PMVP operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$159M | -$92M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$163M | -$83M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$145M | -$73M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.4% | -8.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CELC and PMVP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.7B | $75M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.7B | $36M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -46.19x | -1.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 44.60x | 0.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PMVP leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PMVP delivers a -55.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-55 in annual profit, vs $-179 for CELC. PMVP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CELC's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PMVP scores 2/9 vs CELC's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -179.0% | -55.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -58.0% | -51.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -50.3% | -38.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -58.0% | -41.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.85x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $75M | -$40M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23M | $41M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $98M | $1M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.02x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CELC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CELC five years ago would be worth $48,161 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $406 for PMVP. Over the past 12 months, CELC leads with a +1184.0% total return vs PMVP's +59.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CELC at 140.6% vs PMVP's -34.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.0% | +15.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1184.0% | +59.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1292.0% | -71.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +381.6% | -95.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +814.7% | -96.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +140.6% | -34.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CELC and PMVP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PMVP is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CELC's 1.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CELC currently trades 86.6% from its 52-week high vs PMVP's 75.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.71x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $151.02 | $1.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.51 | $0.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.6% | +75.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.4 | 56.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 800K | 730K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $124.75 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PMVP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CELC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
CELC vs PMVP: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CELC or PMVP a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Celcuity Inc.
(CELC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CELC or PMVP?
Over the past 5 years, Celcuity Inc.
(CELC) delivered a total return of +381. 6%, compared to -95. 9% for PMV Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (PMVP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CELC returned +814. 7% versus PMVP's -96. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CELC or PMVP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PMV Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(PMVP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Celcuity Inc. 's 1. 71β — meaning CELC is approximately 125% more volatile than PMVP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PMV Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (PMVP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 85% for Celcuity Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CELC or PMVP?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PMV Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
grew EPS 21. 0% year-over-year, compared to -5. 2% for Celcuity Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CELC or PMVP?
Celcuity Inc.
(CELC) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for PMV Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CELC leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for PMVP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CELC leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CELC or PMVP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is CELC or PMVP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PMV Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(PMVP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76)). Celcuity Inc. (CELC) carries a higher beta of 1. 71 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PMVP: -96. 2%, CELC: +814. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CELC and PMVP?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.