Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CELC vs RVMD vs KYMR vs TNGX vs PMVP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
CELC vs RVMD vs KYMR vs TNGX vs PMVP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $5.66B | $30.30B | $6.91B | $3.19B | $75M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $51M | $62M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-163M | $-1.37B | $-315M | $-102M | $-83M |
| Gross Margin | — | — | 33.2% | 97.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | -7.0% | -178.4% | — |
| Total Debt | $98M | $159M | $82M | $34M | $1M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23M | $384M | $357M | $112M | $41M |
CELC vs RVMD vs KYMR vs TNGX vs PMVP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Celcuity Inc. (CELC) | 100 | 2253.6 | +2153.6% |
| Revolution Medicine… (RVMD) | 100 | 409.5 | +309.5% |
| Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR) | 100 | 261.9 | +161.9% |
| Tango Therapeutics,… (TNGX) | 100 | 226.6 | +126.6% |
| PMV Pharmaceuticals… (PMVP) | 100 | 4.0 | -96.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CELC vs RVMD vs KYMR vs TNGX vs PMVP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CELC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 8.1% 10Y total return vs RVMD's 393.1%
Among these 5 stocks, RVMD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
KYMR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for efficiency.
- -22.3% ROA vs RVMD's -59.1%, ROIC -24.9% vs -54.3%
TNGX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 48.3%, EPS growth 26.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.9%
- 48.3% revenue growth vs RVMD's -98.6%
- +19.4% vs PMVP's +59.6%
PMVP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 0.76
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 12.22x
- Beta 0.76, current ratio 12.22x
- 5.6% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 48.3% revenue growth vs RVMD's -98.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.6% margin vs KYMR's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs TNGX's 1.81, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.4% vs PMVP's +59.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -22.3% ROA vs RVMD's -59.1%, ROIC -24.9% vs -54.3% |
CELC vs RVMD vs KYMR vs TNGX vs PMVP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CELC vs RVMD vs KYMR vs TNGX vs PMVP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TNGX leads in 1 of 6 categories
KYMR leads 1 • CELC leads 1 • RVMD leads 0 • PMVP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TNGX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TNGX and PMVP operate at a comparable scale, with $62M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -162.9% (TNGX) to -6.1% (KYMR). On growth, KYMR holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $51M | $62M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$159M | -$1.4B | -$352M | -$109M | -$92M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$163M | -$1.4B | -$315M | -$102M | -$83M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$145M | -$1.1B | -$244M | -$140M | -$73M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | +33.2% | +97.3% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | -7.0% | -178.4% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | -6.1% | -162.9% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | -4.7% | -2.2% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +55.5% | -100.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.4% | -102.7% | +13.4% | +11.8% | -8.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CELC and TNGX and PMVP each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.7B | $30.3B | $6.9B | $3.2B | $75M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.7B | $30.1B | $6.6B | $3.1B | $36M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -46.19x | -23.95x | -22.93x | -26.99x | -1.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 176.26x | 51.17x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 44.60x | 16.61x | 4.52x | 7.88x | 0.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KYMR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KYMR delivers a -25.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-25 in annual profit, vs $-179 for CELC. PMVP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CELC's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KYMR scores 4/9 vs RVMD's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -179.0% | -83.2% | -25.0% | -50.3% | -55.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -58.0% | -59.1% | -22.3% | -36.3% | -51.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -50.3% | -54.3% | -24.9% | -38.5% | -38.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -58.0% | -53.0% | -27.2% | -34.0% | -41.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.85x | 0.10x | 0.05x | 0.10x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $75M | -$225M | -$275M | -$79M | -$40M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23M | $384M | $357M | $112M | $41M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $98M | $159M | $82M | $34M | $1M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.02x | -81.62x | -2119.53x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CELC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RVMD five years ago would be worth $48,210 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $406 for PMVP. Over the past 12 months, TNGX leads with a +1941.7% total return vs PMVP's +59.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CELC at 140.6% vs PMVP's -34.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.0% | +80.3% | +16.3% | +162.9% | +15.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1184.0% | +278.4% | +190.7% | +1941.7% | +59.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1292.0% | +483.1% | +205.1% | +582.6% | -71.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +381.6% | +382.1% | +92.1% | +117.2% | -95.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +814.7% | +393.1% | +154.4% | +129.5% | -96.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +140.6% | +80.0% | +45.0% | +89.7% | -34.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RVMD and PMVP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PMVP is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TNGX's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RVMD currently trades 91.5% from its 52-week high vs PMVP's 75.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.71x | 1.08x | 1.15x | 1.81x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $151.02 | $155.70 | $103.00 | $28.41 | $1.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.51 | $34.00 | $28.06 | $1.03 | $0.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.6% | +91.5% | +82.2% | +82.6% | +75.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.4 | 66.4 | 54.1 | 53.4 | 56.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 800K | 2.9M | 602K | 3.4M | 730K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CELC as "Buy", RVMD as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy", TNGX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.3% upside for KYMR (target: $117) vs -4.6% for CELC (target: $125).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $124.75 | $154.80 | $117.06 | $22.75 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 22 | 26 | 10 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TNGX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). KYMR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
CELC vs RVMD vs KYMR vs TNGX vs PMVP: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CELC or RVMD or KYMR or TNGX or PMVP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tango Therapeutics, Inc.
(TNGX) is the stronger pick with 48. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). Analysts rate Celcuity Inc. (CELC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CELC or RVMD or KYMR or TNGX or PMVP?
Over the past 5 years, Revolution Medicines, Inc.
(RVMD) delivered a total return of +382. 1%, compared to -95. 9% for PMV Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (PMVP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CELC returned +814. 7% versus PMVP's -96. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CELC or RVMD or KYMR or TNGX or PMVP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PMV Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(PMVP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Tango Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning TNGX is approximately 138% more volatile than PMVP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PMV Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (PMVP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 85% for Celcuity Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CELC or RVMD or KYMR or TNGX or PMVP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tango Therapeutics, Inc.
(TNGX) is pulling ahead at 48. 3% versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tango Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 26. 9% year-over-year, compared to -66. 2% for Revolution Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TNGX leads at 35. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CELC or RVMD or KYMR or TNGX or PMVP?
Celcuity Inc.
(CELC) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CELC leads at 0. 0% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CELC or RVMD or KYMR or TNGX or PMVP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is CELC or RVMD or KYMR or TNGX or PMVP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Revolution Medicines, Inc.
(RVMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 08), +393. 1% 10Y return). Tango Therapeutics, Inc. (TNGX) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RVMD: +393. 1%, TNGX: +129. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CELC and RVMD and KYMR and TNGX and PMVP?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CELC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RVMD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TNGX is a small-cap high-growth stock; PMVP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.