Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CELU vs NKTR vs FATE vs KYMR vs IMVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
CELU vs NKTR vs FATE vs KYMR vs IMVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $21M | $1.66B | $276M | $7.03B | $5.88B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $27M | $56M | $7M | $51M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-92M | $-158M | $-136M | $-315M | $-464M |
| Gross Margin | 76.0% | 80.1% | — | 33.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -230.9% | -226.3% | -22.2% | -7.0% | — |
| Total Debt | $41M | $149M | $78M | $82M | $98K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $15M | $47M | $357M | $714M |
CELU vs NKTR vs FATE vs KYMR vs IMVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Celularity Inc. (CELU) | 100 | 0.9 | -99.1% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 28.2 | -71.8% |
| Fate Therapeutics, … (FATE) | 100 | 6.6 | -93.4% |
| Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR) | 100 | 269.8 | +169.8% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 85.2 | -14.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CELU vs NKTR vs FATE vs KYMR vs IMVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CELU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends is your priority.
- 26.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
NKTR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +7.8% vs CELU's -47.0%
Among these 5 stocks, FATE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
KYMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.03
- Rev growth -16.7%, EPS growth -23.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.8%
- Beta 1.03, current ratio 10.47x
- -16.7% revenue growth vs FATE's -51.2%
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 190.9% 10Y total return vs KYMR's 158.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.36, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 11.16x
- 3.2% margin vs FATE's -20.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -16.7% revenue growth vs FATE's -51.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs FATE's -20.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.03 vs FATE's 1.99, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 26.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.8% vs CELU's -47.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -22.3% ROA vs CELU's -77.9%, ROIC -24.9% vs -125.0% |
CELU vs NKTR vs FATE vs KYMR vs IMVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CELU vs NKTR vs FATE vs KYMR vs IMVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NKTR leads in 2 of 6 categories
KYMR leads 1 • CELU leads 0 • FATE leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NKTR and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $56M and $0 in trailing revenue. NKTR is the more profitable business, keeping -2.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FATE's -20.5%. On growth, KYMR holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $27M | $56M | $7M | $51M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$54M | -$125M | -$148M | -$352M | -$487M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$92M | -$158M | -$136M | -$315M | -$464M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13M | -$160M | -$88M | -$244M | -$423M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +76.0% | +80.1% | — | +33.2% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | -2.3% | -22.2% | -7.0% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | -2.8% | -20.5% | -6.1% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -49.9% | -2.9% | -13.2% | -4.7% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -77.4% | +3.8% | -26.4% | +55.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -59.7% | +49.7% | +38.6% | +13.4% | +19.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CELU and FATE and KYMR each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $1.7B | $276M | $7.0B | $5.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $56M | $1.8B | $307M | $6.8B | $5.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.25x | -8.42x | -2.08x | -23.33x | -10.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.80x | 30.09x | 41.49x | 179.28x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 15.38x | 1.37x | 4.60x | 6.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KYMR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KYMR delivers a -25.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-25 in annual profit, vs $-87 for NKTR. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NKTR's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KYMR scores 4/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -87.0% | -65.8% | -25.0% | -47.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -77.9% | -40.7% | -42.7% | -22.3% | -44.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -125.0% | -57.2% | -36.5% | -24.9% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -116.1% | -55.7% | -43.1% | -27.2% | -66.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.66x | 0.38x | 0.05x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $35M | $134M | $31M | -$275M | -$714M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $15M | $47M | $357M | $714M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $41M | $149M | $78M | $82M | $98,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.58x | -6.23x | — | -2119.53x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KYMR five years ago would be worth $19,577 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $87 for CELU. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +782.4% total return vs CELU's -47.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 92.1% vs CELU's -42.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -27.3% | +88.6% | +141.4% | +18.3% | +11.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -47.0% | +782.4% | +132.0% | +179.8% | +102.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.8% | +609.0% | -56.1% | +210.3% | +49.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.1% | -72.3% | -96.8% | +95.8% | +84.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.1% | -59.8% | +38.2% | +158.8% | +190.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -42.3% | +92.1% | -24.0% | +45.9% | +14.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FATE and KYMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KYMR is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FATE's 1.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FATE currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs CELU's 20.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.40x | 1.80x | 1.99x | 1.03x | 1.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.35 | $109.00 | $2.46 | $103.00 | $30.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.87 | $7.99 | $0.91 | $28.06 | $13.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +20.2% | +75.1% | +97.0% | +83.6% | +96.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 28.9 | 50.5 | 82.9 | 50.5 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 191K | 977K | 1.9M | 583K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NKTR as "Buy", FATE as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1552.7% upside for FATE (target: $40) vs 37.2% for KYMR (target: $118). CELU is the only dividend payer here at 26.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $147.33 | $39.50 | $118.06 | $45.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 33 | 31 | 26 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +26.2% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.23 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NKTR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). KYMR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
CELU vs NKTR vs FATE vs KYMR vs IMVT: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CELU or NKTR or FATE or KYMR or IMVT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) is the stronger pick with -16. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -51. 2% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). Analysts rate Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CELU or NKTR or FATE or KYMR or IMVT?
Over the past 5 years, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) delivered a total return of +95. 8%, compared to -99. 1% for Celularity Inc. (CELU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +190. 9% versus CELU's -99. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CELU or NKTR or FATE or KYMR or IMVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus Fate Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 99β — meaning FATE is approximately 94% more volatile than KYMR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 166% for Nektar Therapeutics — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CELU or NKTR or FATE or KYMR or IMVT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) is pulling ahead at -16. 7% versus -51. 2% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fate Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 29. 9% year-over-year, compared to -45. 2% for Immunovant, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CELU leads at 13. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CELU or NKTR or FATE or KYMR or IMVT?
Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -20. 5% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IMVT leads at 0. 0% versus -22. 2% for FATE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CELU or NKTR or FATE or KYMR or IMVT?
In this comparison, CELU (26.
2% yield) pays a dividend. NKTR, FATE, KYMR, IMVT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is CELU or NKTR or FATE or KYMR or IMVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03), +158. 8% 10Y return). Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE) carries a higher beta of 1. 99 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KYMR: +158. 8%, FATE: +38. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CELU and NKTR and FATE and KYMR and IMVT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CELU is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FATE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CELU pays a dividend while NKTR, FATE, KYMR, IMVT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.