Auto - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CENN vs XOS vs WKHS vs REE vs CHPT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
Auto - Manufacturers
Auto - Recreational Vehicles
Specialty Retail
CENN vs XOS vs WKHS vs REE vs CHPT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Manufacturers | Agricultural - Machinery | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Recreational Vehicles | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $3M | $15M | $32M | $7M | $134M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18M | $52M | $11M | $207K | $411M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-73M | $-35M | $-64M | $-100M | $-220M |
| Gross Margin | -12.8% | 3.1% | -236.8% | -79.8% | 30.5% |
| Operating Margin | -180.0% | -72.6% | -5.6% | -561.7% | -51.1% |
| Total Debt | $11M | $43M | $16M | $51M | $272M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $11M | $4M | $72M | $142M |
CENN vs XOS vs WKHS vs REE vs CHPT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cenntro Electric Gr… (CENN) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Xos, Inc. (XOS) | 100 | 0.6 | -99.4% |
| Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| REE Automotive Ltd. (REE) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| ChargePoint Holding… (CHPT) | 100 | 0.8 | -99.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CENN vs XOS vs WKHS vs REE vs CHPT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, CENN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
XOS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 25.7%, EPS growth 49.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 123.0%
- 25.7% revenue growth vs REE's -88.6%
WKHS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +236.1% vs CENN's -92.3%
REE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.23
- Lower volatility, beta 1.23, current ratio 2.28x
- Beta 1.23, current ratio 2.28x
- Beta 1.23 vs CHPT's 2.61, lower leverage
CHPT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -96.8% 10Y total return vs XOS's -99.4%
- -53.5% margin vs REE's -483.6%
- -25.8% ROA vs REE's -88.3%, ROIC -83.8% vs -154.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.7% revenue growth vs REE's -88.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | -53.5% margin vs REE's -483.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.23 vs CHPT's 2.61, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +236.1% vs CENN's -92.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -25.8% ROA vs REE's -88.3%, ROIC -83.8% vs -154.1% |
CENN vs XOS vs WKHS vs REE vs CHPT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CENN vs XOS vs WKHS vs REE vs CHPT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CENN leads in 2 of 6 categories
CHPT leads 1 • XOS leads 1 • WKHS leads 0 • REE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHPT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHPT is the larger business by revenue, generating $411M annually — 1986.6x REE's $207,000. CHPT is the more profitable business, keeping -53.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to REE's -483.6%. On growth, CENN holds the edge at +73.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18M | $52M | $11M | $207,000 | $411M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$33M | -$34M | -$52M | -$113M | -$180M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$73M | -$35M | -$64M | -$100M | -$220M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13M | $6M | -$33M | -$89M | -$67M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -12.8% | +3.1% | -2.4% | -79.8% | +30.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -180.0% | -72.6% | -5.6% | -561.7% | -51.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | -66.1% | -6.1% | -483.6% | -53.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -73.9% | +12.0% | -3.1% | -430.1% | -16.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +73.8% | +4.5% | -5.0% | — | +7.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -56.4% | +116.7% | +95.9% | +59.2% | +28.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CENN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $15M | $32M | $7M | $134M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $47M | $44M | -$15M | $263M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.05x | -0.28x | -0.07x | -0.06x | -0.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.19x | 0.27x | 4.83x | 37.70x | 0.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.08x | 0.41x | 0.16x | 0.30x | 6.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CENN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CENN delivers a -108.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-108 in annual profit, vs $-4 for CHPT. CENN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHPT's 12.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHPT scores 5/9 vs REE's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -108.2% | -111.2% | -198.1% | -2.6% | -3.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -66.2% | -46.8% | -60.6% | -88.3% | -25.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -36.2% | -53.1% | -77.6% | -154.1% | -83.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -43.0% | -72.9% | -107.9% | -80.4% | -41.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 1.28x | 0.37x | 2.19x | 12.75x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7M | $32M | $12M | -$22M | $130M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $11M | $4M | $72M | $142M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $43M | $16M | $51M | $272M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -73.88x | -19.14x | -3.84x | -12.31x | -8.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XOS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHPT five years ago would be worth $136 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8 for CENN. Over the past 12 months, WKHS leads with a +236.1% total return vs CENN's -92.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XOS at -49.8% vs WKHS's -75.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -55.4% | -6.1% | -34.7% | -43.5% | -12.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -92.3% | -50.1% | +236.1% | -84.6% | -48.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.3% | -87.4% | -98.6% | -95.3% | -96.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -99.4% | -99.8% | -99.9% | -98.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -99.4% | -99.8% | -99.9% | -96.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -74.4% | -49.8% | -75.9% | -64.0% | -67.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — REE and CHPT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
REE is the less volatile stock with a 1.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHPT's 2.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHPT currently trades 34.6% from its 52-week high vs CENN's 6.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.92x | 1.51x | 1.46x | 1.23x | 2.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $66.00 | $5.60 | $11.80 | $3.61 | $17.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.15 | $1.60 | $0.53 | $0.42 | $4.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.1% | +33.0% | +30.8% | +12.0% | +34.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.8 | 57.3 | 72.7 | 27.8 | 55.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 32K | 25K | 167K | 41K | 474K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | — | $7.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | — | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CENN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CHPT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
CENN vs XOS vs WKHS vs REE vs CHPT: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CENN or XOS or WKHS or REE or CHPT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Xos, Inc.
(XOS) is the stronger pick with 25. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -88. 6% for REE Automotive Ltd. (REE). Analysts rate ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT) a "Hold" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CENN or XOS or WKHS or REE or CHPT?
Over the past 5 years, ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
(CHPT) delivered a total return of -98. 6%, compared to -99. 9% for Cenntro Electric Group Limited (CENN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHPT returned -96. 8% versus CENN's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CENN or XOS or WKHS or REE or CHPT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), REE Automotive Ltd.
(REE) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 23β versus ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 61β — meaning CHPT is approximately 113% more volatile than REE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cenntro Electric Group Limited (CENN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 13% for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CENN or XOS or WKHS or REE or CHPT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Xos, Inc.
(XOS) is pulling ahead at 25. 7% versus -88. 6% for REE Automotive Ltd. (REE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Workhorse Group Inc. grew EPS 65. 4% year-over-year, compared to -0. 2% for Cenntro Electric Group Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, REE leads at 212. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CENN or XOS or WKHS or REE or CHPT?
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
(CHPT) is the more profitable company, earning -53. 5% net margin versus -610. 7% for REE Automotive Ltd. — meaning it keeps -53. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHPT leads at -51. 1% versus -432. 4% for REE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHPT leads at 30. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CENN or XOS or WKHS or REE or CHPT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is CENN or XOS or WKHS or REE or CHPT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, REE Automotive Ltd.
(REE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 23)). ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT) carries a higher beta of 2. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (REE: -99. 9%, CHPT: -96. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CENN and XOS and WKHS and REE and CHPT?
These companies operate in different sectors (CENN (Consumer Cyclical) and XOS (Industrials) and WKHS (Consumer Cyclical) and REE (Consumer Cyclical) and CHPT (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CENN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; XOS is a small-cap high-growth stock; WKHS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CHPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.