Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CFR vs FHN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
CFR vs FHN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $8.72B | $11.87B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.92B | $4.99B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $669M | $982M |
| Gross Margin | 75.0% | 67.3% |
| Operating Margin | 26.4% | 25.7% |
| Forward P/E | 13.3x | 11.4x |
| Total Debt | $4.77B | $4.57B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8.86B | $961M |
CFR vs FHN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cullen/Frost Banker… (CFR) | 100 | 182.4 | +82.4% |
| First Horizon Corpo… (FHN) | 100 | 261.7 | +161.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CFR vs FHN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CFR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 33 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 2.9%
- Rev growth 2.5%, EPS growth 11.8%
- 181.5% 10Y total return vs FHN's 119.6%
FHN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (11.4x vs 13.3x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CFR's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- +34.9% vs CFR's +16.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.5% NII/revenue growth vs FHN's 1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.4x vs 13.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CFR's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs FHN's 1.10 | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, 33-year raise streak, vs FHN's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.9% vs CFR's +16.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CFR's 0.5% |
CFR vs FHN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CFR vs FHN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CFR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FHN is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.0B annually — 1.7x CFR's $2.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 22.2% (CFR) to 19.7% (FHN).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.9B | $5.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $861M | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $669M | $982M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $806M | $628M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.0% | +67.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.4% | +25.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.2% | +19.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.4% | +12.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.0% | +79.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FHN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.0x trailing earnings, FHN trades at a 7% valuation discount to CFR's 14.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CFR's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FHN's 11.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.7B | $11.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.6B | $15.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.97x | 13.02x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.31x | 11.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.98x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.38x | 11.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.99x | 2.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.94x | 1.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 68.52x | 18.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CFR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CFR delivers a 15.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $11 for FHN. FHN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.50x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CFR's 1.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FHN scores 7/9 vs CFR's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.1% | +10.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.5% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.0% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.04x | 0.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4.1B | $3.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8.9B | $961M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.8B | $4.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.21x | 0.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FHN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FHN five years ago would be worth $14,355 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,659 for CFR. Over the past 12 months, FHN leads with a +34.9% total return vs CFR's +16.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FHN at 34.9% vs CFR's 15.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.9% | +2.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.3% | +34.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +53.8% | +145.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.6% | +43.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +181.5% | +119.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.4% | +34.9% |
Risk & Volatility
CFR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CFR is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FHN's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $148.97 | $26.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $119.00 | $18.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.0% | +92.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.1 | 62.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 524K | 5.0M |
Analyst Outlook
CFR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CFR as "Hold" and FHN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 14.4% upside for FHN (target: $28) vs 11.8% for CFR (target: $155). For income investors, CFR offers the higher dividend yield at 2.88% vs FHN's 2.59%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $154.88 | $28.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 33 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.9% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 33 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.98 | $0.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.8% | +7.7% |
CFR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FHN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
CFR vs FHN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CFR or FHN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.
(CFR) is the stronger pick with 2. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for First Horizon Corporation (FHN). First Horizon Corporation (FHN) offers the better valuation at 13. 0x trailing P/E (11. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. (CFR) a "Hold" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CFR or FHN?
On trailing P/E, First Horizon Corporation (FHN) is the cheapest at 13.
0x versus Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. at 14. 0x. On forward P/E, First Horizon Corporation is actually cheaper at 11. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CFR or FHN?
Over the past 5 years, First Horizon Corporation (FHN) delivered a total return of +43.
6%, compared to +26. 6% for Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. (CFR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CFR returned +181. 5% versus FHN's +119. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CFR or FHN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.
(CFR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus First Horizon Corporation's 1. 10β — meaning FHN is approximately 33% more volatile than CFR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Horizon Corporation (FHN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 50% versus 104% for Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CFR or FHN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.
(CFR) is pulling ahead at 2. 5% versus 1. 0% for First Horizon Corporation (FHN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Horizon Corporation grew EPS 38. 2% year-over-year, compared to 11. 8% for Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CFR or FHN?
Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.
(CFR) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 2% net margin versus 19. 7% for First Horizon Corporation — meaning it keeps 22. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CFR leads at 26. 4% versus 25. 7% for FHN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CFR leads at 75. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CFR or FHN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, First Horizon Corporation (FHN) trades at 11.
4x forward P/E versus 13. 3x for Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FHN: 14. 4% to $28. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CFR or FHN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. (CFR) offers the highest yield at 2. 9%, versus 2. 6% for First Horizon Corporation (FHN).
09Is CFR or FHN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.
(CFR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 2. 9% yield, +181. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CFR: +181. 5%, FHN: +119. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CFR and FHN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.