Comprehensive Stock Comparison

Compare Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) vs Walmart Inc. (WMT) Stock

Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.

Tickers 2 / 10100+ Metrics

Selected Stocks

Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Quick Verdict

CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCHA167.4% revenue growth vs WMT's 4.7%
ValueCHALower P/E (7.2x vs 43.8x)
Quality / MarginsCHA13.6% net margin vs WMT's 3.3%
Stability / SafetyWMTBeta 0.53 vs CHA's 1.00
DividendsWMT0.7% yield; 37-year raise streak; CHA pays no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)WMT+30.7% vs CHA's -63.6%
Efficiency (ROA)CHA15.1% ROA vs WMT's 7.9%
Bottom line: CHA leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the stronger pick for investors who prioritize growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Walmart Inc. is the better choice for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. As direct sector peers, they can serve as alternatives in the same portfolio allocation.

Who Each Stock Is For

Income & stability

Growth exposure

Long-term compounding (10Y)

Sleep-well-at-night portfolio

Defensive / Recession hedge

Business Model

What each company does and how it makes money

CHAChagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares
Consumer Defensive

Chagee Holdings operates a premium tea beverage chain with physical teahouses and online platforms across China and internationally. It generates revenue primarily from direct sales of tea drinks through its stores (roughly 70-80%) and franchise fees from its expanding network of franchised locations. The company's competitive advantage lies in its strong brand recognition for premium tea experiences and its vertically integrated supply chain for tea sourcing and product development.

WMTWalmart Inc.
Consumer Defensive

Walmart is the world's largest retailer operating a vast network of physical stores and e-commerce platforms. It generates revenue primarily through retail sales — with Walmart U.S. contributing about 65% of total revenue, Walmart International around 20%, and Sam's Club membership warehouse clubs roughly 15%. Its key competitive advantage is massive scale and supply chain efficiency, enabling everyday low prices that competitors struggle to match.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CHAChagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

WMTWalmart Inc.
FY 2025
Walmart U S
68.6%$462.4B
Walmart International
18.1%$121.9B
Sams Club
13.4%$90.2B

Financial Metrics Comparison

Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging

Financial Scorecard

CHA 3WMT 2
Financial MetricsCHA4/6 metrics
Valuation MetricsCHA6/6 metrics
Profitability & EfficiencyCHA6/7 metrics
Total ReturnsWMT6/6 metrics
Risk & VolatilityWMT2/2 metrics
Analyst Outlook0/0 metrics

CHA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics). WMT leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).

Financial Metrics (TTM)

WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 53.0x CHA's $13.3B. CHA is the more profitable business, keeping 13.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WMT's 3.3%. On growth, WMT holds the edge at +5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCHAChagee Holdings L…WMTWalmart Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$13.3B$703.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2.0B$42.8B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1.8B$22.9B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$2.0B$15.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+47.2%+24.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+15.3%+4.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+13.6%+3.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+14.7%+2.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-9.4%+5.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-41.8%+35.1%
CHA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

At 5.5x trailing earnings, CHA trades at a 88% valuation discount to WMT's 46.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CHA's 1.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WMT's 24.4x.

MetricCHAChagee Holdings L…WMTWalmart Inc.
Market CapShares × price$1.3B$1.02T
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$704M$1.08T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS5.47x46.87x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.15x43.76x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.26x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple1.64x24.44x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.73x1.43x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share5.00x10.27x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF3.48x24.53x
CHA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

WMT delivers a 22.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $21 for CHA. CHA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WMT's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHA scores 8/9 vs WMT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCHAChagee Holdings L…WMTWalmart Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+20.8%+22.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+15.1%+7.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+14.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+99.8%+17.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–986
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.20x0.67x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$4.2B$56.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$4.8B$10.7B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$548M$67.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense11.85x
CHA leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (with DRIP)

A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $30,135 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,637 for CHA. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +30.7% total return vs CHA's -63.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 40.2% vs CHA's -28.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCHAChagee Holdings L…WMTWalmart Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-11.2%+13.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-63.6%+30.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-63.6%+175.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-63.6%+201.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-63.6%+512.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-28.6%+40.2%
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHA's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs CHA's 26.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCHAChagee Holdings L…WMTWalmart Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.00x0.53x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$41.80$134.69
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$9.95$79.81
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+26.1%+95.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10050.049.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded742K29.5M
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Wall Street rates CHA as "Hold" and WMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 51.0% upside for CHA (target: $17) vs 6.5% for WMT (target: $136). WMT is the only dividend payer here at 0.73% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricCHAChagee Holdings L…WMTWalmart Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$16.50$136.31
# AnalystsCovering analysts1564
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises37
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.94
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.3%+0.8%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Historical Charts

Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.

Chart 1Revenue Growth — 10 Years

Stock20172026Change
Chagee Holdings Lim… (CHA)$492M$12.4B+2423.2%
Walmart Inc. (WMT)$485.9B$713.2B+46.8%

Walmart Inc.'s revenue grew from $485.9B (2017) to $713.2B (2026) — a 4.4% CAGR.

Chart 2Net Margin Trend — 10 Years

Stock20172026Change
Chagee Holdings Lim… (CHA)-18.5%20.3%+209.9%
Walmart Inc. (WMT)2.8%3.1%+9.3%

Walmart Inc.'s net margin went from 3% (2017) to 3% (2026).

Chart 3P/E Ratio History — 10 Years

Stock20172026Change
Walmart Inc. (WMT)22.546.9+108.4%

Walmart Inc. has traded in a 23x–53x P/E range over 10 years; current trailing P/E is ~47x.

Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years

Stock20172026Change
Chagee Holdings Lim… (CHA)-0.7913.71+1835.4%
Walmart Inc. (WMT)1.462.73+87.0%

Walmart Inc.'s EPS grew from $1.46 (2017) to $2.73 (2026) — a 7% CAGR.

Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years

2022
$32M
$11B
2023
$2B
$12B
2024
$3B
$15B
2025
$13B
2026
$42B
Chagee Holdings Lim… (CHA)Walmart Inc. (WMT)

Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares generated $3B FCF in 2024 (+7938% vs 2022). Walmart Inc. generated $42B FCF in 2026 (+61% vs 2021).

Loading custom metrics...

CHA vs WMT: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CHA or WMT a better buy right now?

Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) offers the better valuation at 5.5x trailing P/E (7.2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CHA or WMT?

On trailing P/E, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is the cheapest at 5.5x versus Walmart Inc. at 46.9x. On forward P/E, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares is actually cheaper at 7.2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CHA or WMT?

Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc. (WMT) delivered a total return of +201.3%, compared to -63.6% for Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA). A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth approximately $30K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +512.5% versus CHA's -63.6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CHA or WMT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc. (WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.53β versus Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares's 1.00β — meaning CHA is approximately 88% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 67% for Walmart Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which has better profit margins — CHA or WMT?

Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is the more profitable company, earning 20.3% net margin versus 3.1% for Walmart Inc. — meaning it keeps 20.3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHA leads at 23.3% versus 4.2% for WMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHA leads at 45.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is CHA or WMT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) trades at 7.2x forward P/E versus 43.8x for Walmart Inc. — 36.6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHA: 51.0% to $16.50.

07

Which pays a better dividend — CHA or WMT?

In this comparison, WMT (0.7% yield) pays a dividend. CHA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is CHA or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc. (WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.53), 0.7% yield, +512.5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +512.5%, CHA: -63.6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between CHA and WMT?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: CHA is a small-cap deep-value stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. WMT pays a dividend while CHA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.

📊
Stocks Like

CHA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
🏦
Stocks Like

WMT

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Better Than Both

Find stocks that beat CHA and WMT on the metrics you choose

Revenue Growth>
%
(CHA: -9.4% · WMT: 5.8%)
Net Margin>
%
(CHA: 13.6% · WMT: 3.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CHA: 5.5x · WMT: 46.9x)