Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) vs Walmart Inc. (WMT) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CHA | 167.4% revenue growth vs WMT's 4.7% |
| Value | CHA | Lower P/E (7.2x vs 43.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | CHA | 13.6% net margin vs WMT's 3.3% |
| Stability / Safety | WMT | Beta 0.53 vs CHA's 1.00 |
| Dividends | WMT | 0.7% yield; 37-year raise streak; CHA pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | WMT | +30.7% vs CHA's -63.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CHA | 15.1% ROA vs WMT's 7.9% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Chagee Holdings operates a premium tea beverage chain with physical teahouses and online platforms across China and internationally. It generates revenue primarily from direct sales of tea drinks through its stores (roughly 70-80%) and franchise fees from its expanding network of franchised locations. The company's competitive advantage lies in its strong brand recognition for premium tea experiences and its vertically integrated supply chain for tea sourcing and product development.
Walmart is the world's largest retailer operating a vast network of physical stores and e-commerce platforms. It generates revenue primarily through retail sales — with Walmart U.S. contributing about 65% of total revenue, Walmart International around 20%, and Sam's Club membership warehouse clubs roughly 15%. Its key competitive advantage is massive scale and supply chain efficiency, enabling everyday low prices that competitors struggle to match.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
CHA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics). WMT leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 53.0x CHA's $13.3B. CHA is the more profitable business, keeping 13.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WMT's 3.3%. On growth, WMT holds the edge at +5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CHAChagee Holdings L… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13.3B | $703.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.0B | $42.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.8B | $22.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.0B | $15.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.2% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.4% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -41.8% | +35.1% |
Valuation Metrics
At 5.5x trailing earnings, CHA trades at a 88% valuation discount to WMT's 46.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CHA's 1.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WMT's 24.4x.
| Metric | CHAChagee Holdings L… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $1.02T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $704M | $1.08T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.47x | 46.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.15x | 43.76x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.64x | 24.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.73x | 1.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.00x | 10.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.48x | 24.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT delivers a 22.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $21 for CHA. CHA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WMT's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHA scores 8/9 vs WMT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | CHAChagee Holdings L… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.8% | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +15.1% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +99.8% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.20x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4.2B | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4.8B | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $548M | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 11.85x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $30,135 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,637 for CHA. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +30.7% total return vs CHA's -63.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 40.2% vs CHA's -28.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CHAChagee Holdings L… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.2% | +13.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -63.6% | +30.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.6% | +175.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.6% | +201.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.6% | +512.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -28.6% | +40.2% |
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHA's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs CHA's 26.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CHAChagee Holdings L… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.80 | $134.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.95 | $79.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +26.1% | +95.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.0 | 49.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 742K | 29.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CHA as "Hold" and WMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 51.0% upside for CHA (target: $17) vs 6.5% for WMT (target: $136). WMT is the only dividend payer here at 0.73% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | CHAChagee Holdings L… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.50 | $136.31 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.3% | +0.8% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chagee Holdings Lim… (CHA) | $492M | $12.4B | +2423.2% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | $485.9B | $713.2B | +46.8% |
Walmart Inc.'s revenue grew from $485.9B (2017) to $713.2B (2026) — a 4.4% CAGR.
Chart 2Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chagee Holdings Lim… (CHA) | -18.5% | 20.3% | +209.9% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 2.8% | 3.1% | +9.3% |
Walmart Inc.'s net margin went from 3% (2017) to 3% (2026).
Chart 3P/E Ratio History — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 22.5 | 46.9 | +108.4% |
Walmart Inc. has traded in a 23x–53x P/E range over 10 years; current trailing P/E is ~47x.
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chagee Holdings Lim… (CHA) | -0.79 | 13.71 | +1835.4% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 1.46 | 2.73 | +87.0% |
Walmart Inc.'s EPS grew from $1.46 (2017) to $2.73 (2026) — a 7% CAGR.
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares generated $3B FCF in 2024 (+7938% vs 2022). Walmart Inc. generated $42B FCF in 2026 (+61% vs 2021).
CHA vs WMT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CHA or WMT a better buy right now?
Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) offers the better valuation at 5.5x trailing P/E (7.2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CHA or WMT?
On trailing P/E, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is the cheapest at 5.5x versus Walmart Inc. at 46.9x. On forward P/E, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares is actually cheaper at 7.2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CHA or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc. (WMT) delivered a total return of +201.3%, compared to -63.6% for Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA). A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth approximately $30K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +512.5% versus CHA's -63.6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CHA or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc. (WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.53β versus Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares's 1.00β — meaning CHA is approximately 88% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 67% for Walmart Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — CHA or WMT?
Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is the more profitable company, earning 20.3% net margin versus 3.1% for Walmart Inc. — meaning it keeps 20.3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHA leads at 23.3% versus 4.2% for WMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHA leads at 45.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CHA or WMT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) trades at 7.2x forward P/E versus 43.8x for Walmart Inc. — 36.6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHA: 51.0% to $16.50.
07Which pays a better dividend — CHA or WMT?
In this comparison, WMT (0.7% yield) pays a dividend. CHA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is CHA or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc. (WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.53), 0.7% yield, +512.5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +512.5%, CHA: -63.6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CHA and WMT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: CHA is a small-cap deep-value stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. WMT pays a dividend while CHA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.