CHNR
China Natural Resources, Inc.
Waste Management
Market Cap$42M
5Y Perf.-86.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CHNR vs PLAG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
PLAG
Planet Green Holdings Corp.
Packaged Foods
Market Cap$14M
5Y Perf.-91.8%
CHNR vs PLAG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CHNR | PLAG |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Waste Management | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $42M | $14M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $4M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $-17M |
| Gross Margin | — | 6.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | -206.6% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $2M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $194K |
CHNR vs PLAG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CHNR
PLAG
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| China Natural Resou… (CHNR) | 100 | 13.3 | -86.7% |
| Planet Green Holdin… (PLAG) | 100 | 8.2 | -91.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CHNR vs PLAG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CHNR leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Planet Green Holdings Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CHNR
China Natural Resources, Inc.
The Income Pick
CHNR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.12
- -93.5% 10Y total return vs PLAG's -99.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, current ratio 0.25x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
PLAG
Planet Green Holdings Corp.
The Growth Play
PLAG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -61.9%, EPS growth 65.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -43.7%
- -61.9% revenue growth vs CHNR's -100.0%
- +67.0% vs CHNR's -2.3%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | PLAG | -61.9% revenue growth vs CHNR's -100.0% |
| Quality / Margins | CHNR | 0.0% margin vs PLAG's -430.8% |
| Stability / Safety | CHNR | Beta 1.12 vs PLAG's 1.36 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | PLAG | +67.0% vs CHNR's -2.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CHNR | -5.3% ROA vs PLAG's -138.8%, ROIC -0.0% vs -27.3% |
CHNR vs PLAG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCHNRLAGGINGPLAG
PLAGPlanet Green Holdings…
1leads
CHNRChina Natural Resourc…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs PLAGMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CHNR1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CHNR6/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
PLAG4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
CHNR2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHNR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLAG and CHNR operate at a comparable scale, with $4M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | CHNRChina Natural Res… | PLAGPlanet Green Hold… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $4M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | -$7M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | -$17M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | -$347M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +6.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -2.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -4.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -87.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -57.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +91.3% | -193.8% |
CHNR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CHNR and PLAG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CHNRChina Natural Res… | PLAGPlanet Green Hold… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $42M | $14M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $41M | $16M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -88.68x | -1.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.21x | 1.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 15.18x |
Evenly matched — CHNR and PLAG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHNR leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHNR delivers a -15.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-16 in annual profit, vs $-47 for PLAG. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLAG scores 6/9 vs CHNR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | CHNRChina Natural Res… | PLAGPlanet Green Hold… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.7% | -47.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.3% | -138.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.0% | -27.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.0% | -42.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $2M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $193,919 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $2M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -263.29x | -94.47x |
CHNR leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PLAG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PLAG five years ago would be worth $1,038 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $721 for CHNR. Over the past 12 months, PLAG leads with a +67.0% total return vs CHNR's -2.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PLAG at -28.4% vs CHNR's -41.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CHNRChina Natural Res… | PLAGPlanet Green Hold… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.2% | -20.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.3% | +67.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.7% | -63.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.8% | -89.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.5% | -99.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -41.2% | -28.4% |
PLAG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CHNR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CHNR is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLAG's 1.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHNR currently trades 52.4% from its 52-week high vs PLAG's 42.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CHNRChina Natural Res… | PLAGPlanet Green Hold… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.12x | 1.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.20 | $4.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.16 | $0.47 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.4% | +42.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.2 | 60.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 893K | 104K |
CHNR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | CHNRChina Natural Res… | PLAGPlanet Green Hold… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
CHNR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PLAG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallChina Natural Resources, In… (CHNR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CHNR vs PLAG: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — CHNR or PLAG?
Over the past 5 years, Planet Green Holdings Corp.
(PLAG) delivered a total return of -89. 6%, compared to -92. 8% for China Natural Resources, Inc. (CHNR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHNR returned -93. 5% versus PLAG's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — CHNR or PLAG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), China Natural Resources, Inc.
(CHNR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus Planet Green Holdings Corp. 's 1. 36β — meaning PLAG is approximately 21% more volatile than CHNR relative to the S&P 500.
03Which is growing faster — CHNR or PLAG?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: China Natural Resources, Inc.
grew EPS 95. 9% year-over-year, compared to 65. 1% for Planet Green Holdings Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — CHNR or PLAG?
China Natural Resources, Inc.
(CHNR) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -108. 9% for Planet Green Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHNR leads at 0. 0% versus -99. 0% for PLAG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLAG leads at 11. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — CHNR or PLAG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is CHNR or PLAG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, China Natural Resources, Inc.
(CHNR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHNR: -93. 5%, PLAG: -99. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between CHNR and PLAG?
These companies operate in different sectors (CHNR (Industrials) and PLAG (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.