CHNR
China Natural Resources, Inc.
Waste Management
Market Cap$42M
5Y Perf.-86.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CHNR vs RCON
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
RCON
Recon Technology, Ltd.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$17M
5Y Perf.-97.4%
CHNR vs RCON — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CHNR | RCON |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Waste Management | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $42M | $17M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $66M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $-43M |
| Gross Margin | — | 23.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | -86.5% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $34M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $99M |
CHNR vs RCON — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CHNR
RCON
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| China Natural Resou… (CHNR) | 100 | 13.3 | -86.7% |
| Recon Technology, L… (RCON) | 100 | 2.6 | -97.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CHNR vs RCON
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CHNR leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. Recon Technology, Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CHNR
China Natural Resources, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
CHNR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -93.5% 10Y total return vs RCON's -99.3%
- 0.0% margin vs RCON's -64.3%
- -2.3% vs RCON's -49.1%
Best for: long-term compounding
RCON
Recon Technology, Ltd.
The Income Pick
RCON is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.47
- Rev growth -3.7%, EPS growth 52.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 7.6%, current ratio 5.88x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | RCON | -3.7% revenue growth vs CHNR's -100.0% |
| Quality / Margins | CHNR | 0.0% margin vs RCON's -64.3% |
| Stability / Safety | RCON | Beta 0.47 vs CHNR's 1.12 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CHNR | -2.3% vs RCON's -49.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CHNR | -5.3% ROA vs RCON's -8.0%, ROIC -0.0% vs -10.6% |
CHNR vs RCON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
CHNR vs RCON — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCHNRLAGGINGRCON
RCONRecon Technology, Ltd.
1leads
CHNRChina Natural Resourc…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs RCONMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CHNR1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CHNR5/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CHNR6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
RCON1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHNR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCON and CHNR operate at a comparable scale, with $66M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | CHNRChina Natural Res… | RCONRecon Technology,… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $66M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | -$54M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | -$43M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | -$44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +23.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -86.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -64.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -65.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +91.3% | +35.7% |
CHNR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CHNR and RCON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CHNRChina Natural Res… | RCONRecon Technology,… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $42M | $17M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $41M | $7M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -88.68x | -1.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.21x | 0.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Evenly matched — CHNR and RCON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHNR leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RCON delivers a -9.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-9 in annual profit, vs $-16 for CHNR. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RCON scores 4/9 vs CHNR's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | CHNRChina Natural Res… | RCONRecon Technology,… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.7% | -9.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.3% | -8.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.0% | -10.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.0% | -11.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | -$64M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $99M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $34M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -263.29x | -372.30x |
CHNR leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CHNR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHNR five years ago would be worth $721 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $55 for RCON. Over the past 12 months, CHNR leads with a -2.3% total return vs RCON's -49.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CHNR at -41.2% vs RCON's -51.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CHNRChina Natural Res… | RCONRecon Technology,… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.2% | -45.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.3% | -49.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.7% | -88.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.8% | -99.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.5% | -99.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -41.2% | -51.6% |
CHNR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CHNR and RCON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RCON is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHNR's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHNR currently trades 52.4% from its 52-week high vs RCON's 11.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CHNRChina Natural Res… | RCONRecon Technology,… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.12x | 0.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.20 | $7.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.16 | $0.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.4% | +11.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.2 | 42.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 893K | 90K |
Evenly matched — CHNR and RCON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
RCON leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | CHNRChina Natural Res… | RCONRecon Technology,… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RCON leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
CHNR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RCON leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
Best OverallChina Natural Resources, In… (CHNR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CHNR vs RCON: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — CHNR or RCON?
Over the past 5 years, China Natural Resources, Inc.
(CHNR) delivered a total return of -92. 8%, compared to -99. 4% for Recon Technology, Ltd. (RCON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHNR returned -93. 5% versus RCON's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — CHNR or RCON?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Recon Technology, Ltd.
(RCON) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus China Natural Resources, Inc. 's 1. 12β — meaning CHNR is approximately 138% more volatile than RCON relative to the S&P 500.
03Which is growing faster — CHNR or RCON?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: China Natural Resources, Inc.
grew EPS 95. 9% year-over-year, compared to 52. 6% for Recon Technology, Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — CHNR or RCON?
China Natural Resources, Inc.
(CHNR) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -64. 3% for Recon Technology, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHNR leads at 0. 0% versus -86. 5% for RCON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCON leads at 23. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — CHNR or RCON?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is CHNR or RCON better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Recon Technology, Ltd.
(RCON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 47)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RCON: -99. 3%, CHNR: -93. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between CHNR and RCON?
These companies operate in different sectors (CHNR (Industrials) and RCON (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.