CHT
Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$33.64B
5Y Perf.+18.3%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CHT vs PHI vs TEF vs SKM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
PHI
PLDT Inc.
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$4.40B
5Y Perf.-16.0%
TEF
Telefónica, S.A.
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$24.41B
5Y Perf.-16.0%
SKM
SK Telecom Co.,Ltd
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$13.93B
5Y Perf.+98.4%
CHT vs PHI vs TEF vs SKM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CHT | PHI | TEF | SKM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $33.64B | $4.40B | $24.41B | $13.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $235.08B | $218.49B | $38.27B | $17.10T |
| Net Income (TTM) | $38.69B | $30.02B | $-2.12B | $407.83B |
| Gross Margin | 36.6% | 71.6% | 83.7% | 88.0% |
| Operating Margin | 20.7% | 29.3% | 6.9% | 11.9% |
| Forward P/E | 0.8x | 0.1x | 12.5x | 0.0x |
| Total Debt | $38.02B | $359.04B | $45.02B | $10.77T |
| Cash & Equiv. | $37.09B | $11.86B | $8.06B | $1.49T |
CHT vs PHI vs TEF vs SKM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CHT
PHI
TEF
SKM
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chunghwa Telecom Co… (CHT) | 100 | 118.3 | +18.3% |
| PLDT Inc. (PHI) | 100 | 84.0 | -16.0% |
| Telefónica, S.A. (TEF) | 100 | 84.0 | -16.0% |
| SK Telecom Co.,Ltd (SKM) | 100 | 198.4 | +98.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CHT vs PHI vs TEF vs SKM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CHT leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Telefónica, S.A. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. PHI and SKM also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CHT
Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.
The Growth Play
CHT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 4.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.19, Low D/E 9.5%, current ratio 1.48x
- 3.3% revenue growth vs SKM's -3.4%
- 16.5% margin vs TEF's -5.5%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
PHI
PLDT Inc.
The Value Pick
PHI is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.03 vs CHT's 0.28
- Lower P/E (0.1x vs 0.8x), PEG 0.03 vs 0.28
Best for: valuation efficiency
TEF
Telefónica, S.A.
The Income Pick
TEF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.16, yield 8.5%
- Beta 0.16, yield 8.5%, current ratio 0.87x
- Beta 0.16 vs SKM's 0.34
- 8.5% yield, vs CHT's 3.7%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
SKM
SK Telecom Co.,Ltd
The Long-Run Compounder
SKM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 239.9% 10Y total return vs CHT's 63.1%
- +77.0% vs TEF's -7.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CHT | 3.3% revenue growth vs SKM's -3.4% |
| Value | PHI | Lower P/E (0.1x vs 0.8x), PEG 0.03 vs 0.28 |
| Quality / Margins | CHT | 16.5% margin vs TEF's -5.5% |
| Stability / Safety | TEF | Beta 0.16 vs SKM's 0.34 |
| Dividends | TEF | 8.5% yield, vs CHT's 3.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | SKM | +77.0% vs TEF's -7.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CHT | 7.3% ROA vs TEF's -2.3%, ROIC 9.1% vs 2.9% |
CHT vs PHI vs TEF vs SKM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2021
FY 2024
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CHT vs PHI vs TEF vs SKM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCHTLAGGINGPHI
Who Leads Where
CHT leads in 3 of 6 categories
TEF leads 1 • SKM leads 1 • PHI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓PHIPLDT Inc.
0leads
SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd
1leads
TEFTelefónica, S.A.
1leads
CHTChunghwa Telecom Co.,…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs TEFvs SKMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CHT3/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TEF5/7
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CHT6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SKM6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
CHT2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SKM is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.10T annually — 446.8x TEF's $38.3B. CHT is the more profitable business, keeping 16.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TEF's -5.5%. On growth, CHT holds the edge at +1.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CHTChunghwa Telecom … | PHIPLDT Inc. | TEFTelefónica, S.A. | SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $235.1B | $218.5B | $38.3B | $17.10T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $87.5B | $108.8B | $12.3B | $5.58T |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $38.7B | $30.0B | -$2.1B | $407.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $51.3B | $35.7B | $4.0B | $1.33T |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.6% | +71.6% | +83.7% | +88.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.7% | +29.3% | +6.9% | +11.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.5% | +13.7% | -5.5% | +2.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.8% | +16.3% | +10.5% | +7.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.4% | -1.2% | -6.6% | -4.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.4% | +17.3% | — | -60.7% |
CHT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
TEF leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.7x trailing earnings, PHI trades at a 83% valuation discount to SKM's 51.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PHI offers better value at 1.82x vs CHT's 9.01x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | CHTChunghwa Telecom … | PHIPLDT Inc. | TEFTelefónica, S.A. | SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $33.6B | $4.4B | $24.4B | $13.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33.7B | $10.1B | $68.0B | $20.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.22x | 8.72x | -65.09x | 51.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.83x | 0.13x | 12.47x | 0.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 9.01x | 1.82x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.55x | 5.28x | 5.15x | 6.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.46x | 1.20x | 0.50x | 1.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.63x | 2.09x | 0.91x | 1.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.24x | 11.19x | 3.98x | 11.75x |
TEF leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PHI delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-10 for TEF. CHT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PHI's 2.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHT scores 9/9 vs SKM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | CHTChunghwa Telecom … | PHIPLDT Inc. | TEFTelefónica, S.A. | SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.8% | +24.4% | -9.9% | +3.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.3% | +4.8% | -2.3% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.1% | +9.1% | +2.9% | +3.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.7% | +12.2% | +3.1% | +4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 2.80x | 1.98x | 0.86x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $929M | $347.2B | $37.0B | $9.28T |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $37.1B | $11.9B | $8.1B | $1.49T |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $38.0B | $359.0B | $45.0B | $10.77T |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 130.38x | — | 0.80x | 2.80x |
CHT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SKM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SKM five years ago would be worth $19,652 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,163 for PHI. Over the past 12 months, SKM leads with a +77.0% total return vs TEF's -7.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SKM at 24.3% vs CHT's 4.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CHTChunghwa Telecom … | PHIPLDT Inc. | TEFTelefónica, S.A. | SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.9% | -3.3% | +8.3% | +76.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.8% | -7.0% | -7.9% | +77.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.0% | +16.3% | +21.5% | +92.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.6% | +11.6% | +25.1% | +96.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.1% | +7.8% | -16.7% | +239.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.5% | +5.2% | +6.7% | +24.3% |
SKM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CHT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TEF is the less volatile stock with a 0.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKM's 0.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHT currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs TEF's 75.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CHTChunghwa Telecom … | PHIPLDT Inc. | TEFTelefónica, S.A. | SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.20x | 0.24x | 0.22x | 0.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $47.03 | $24.51 | $5.72 | $40.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $39.28 | $18.61 | $3.67 | $19.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.2% | +83.0% | +75.7% | +89.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.8 | 45.6 | 70.2 | 57.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 185K | 137K | 516K | 1.7M |
CHT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CHT and TEF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CHT as "Sell", PHI as "Hold", TEF as "Buy", SKM as "Hold". For income investors, TEF offers the higher dividend yield at 8.50% vs SKM's 3.15%.
| Metric | CHTChunghwa Telecom … | PHIPLDT Inc. | TEFTelefónica, S.A. | SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Sell | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 4 | 20 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.7% | +7.9% | +8.5% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $50.30 | $97.25 | $0.31 | $1661.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Evenly matched — CHT and TEF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
CHT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TEF leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallChunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (CHT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CHT vs PHI vs TEF vs SKM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CHT or PHI or TEF or SKM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Chunghwa Telecom Co.
, Ltd. (CHT) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM). PLDT Inc. (PHI) offers the better valuation at 8. 7x trailing P/E (0. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Telefónica, S. A. (TEF) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CHT or PHI or TEF or SKM?
On trailing P/E, PLDT Inc.
(PHI) is the cheapest at 8. 7x versus SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd at 51. 5x. On forward P/E, SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd is actually cheaper at 0. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: PLDT Inc. wins at 0. 03x versus Chunghwa Telecom Co. , Ltd. 's 0. 28x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CHT or PHI or TEF or SKM?
Over the past 5 years, SK Telecom Co.
,Ltd (SKM) delivered a total return of +96. 5%, compared to +11. 6% for PLDT Inc. (PHI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SKM returned +247. 9% versus TEF's -16. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CHT or PHI or TEF or SKM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chunghwa Telecom Co.
, Ltd. (CHT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 20β versus SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd's 0. 36β — meaning SKM is approximately 85% more volatile than CHT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chunghwa Telecom Co. , Ltd. (CHT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 3% for PLDT Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CHT or PHI or TEF or SKM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chunghwa Telecom Co.
, Ltd. (CHT) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -3. 4% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Telefónica, S. A. grew EPS 71. 8% year-over-year, compared to -68. 0% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd. Over a 3-year CAGR, CHT leads at 3. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CHT or PHI or TEF or SKM?
Chunghwa Telecom Co.
, Ltd. (CHT) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 4% net margin versus -0. 1% for Telefónica, S. A. — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PHI leads at 24. 9% versus 5. 8% for TEF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TEF leads at 69. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CHT or PHI or TEF or SKM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, PLDT Inc. (PHI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 03x versus Chunghwa Telecom Co. , Ltd. 's 0. 28x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 12. 5x for Telefónica, S. A. — 12. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — CHT or PHI or TEF or SKM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Telefónica, S. A. (TEF) offers the highest yield at 8. 5%, versus 3. 2% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM).
09Is CHT or PHI or TEF or SKM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chunghwa Telecom Co.
, Ltd. (CHT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 20), 3. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHT: +64. 4%, PHI: +8. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CHT and PHI and TEF and SKM?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CHT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; PHI is a small-cap deep-value stock; TEF is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; SKM is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 50%
- Dividend Yield > 3.3%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 52%
- Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Revenue Growth>
%
(CHT: 1.4% · PHI: -1.2%)Net Margin>
%
(CHT: 16.5% · PHI: 13.7%)P/E Ratio<
x
(CHT: 27.2x · PHI: 8.7x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.