CHT
Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$33.99B
5Y Perf.+18.3%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CHT vs SKM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SKM
SK Telecom Co.,Ltd
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$14.53B
5Y Perf.+98.4%
CHT vs SKM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CHT | SKM |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $33.99B | $14.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $235.08B | $17.10T |
| Net Income (TTM) | $38.69B | $408.41B |
| Gross Margin | 36.6% | 90.2% |
| Operating Margin | 20.7% | 5.7% |
| Forward P/E | 0.8x | 0.0x |
| Total Debt | $38.02B | $10.77T |
| Cash & Equiv. | $37.09B | $1.49T |
CHT vs SKM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CHT
SKM
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chunghwa Telecom Co… (CHT) | 100 | 118.3 | +18.3% |
| SK Telecom Co.,Ltd (SKM) | 100 | 198.4 | +98.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CHT vs SKM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CHT leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. SK Telecom Co.,Ltd is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CHT
Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.
The Income Pick
CHT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.20, yield 3.7%
- Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 4.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.20, Low D/E 9.5%, current ratio 1.48x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SKM
SK Telecom Co.,Ltd
The Long-Run Compounder
SKM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 247.9% 10Y total return vs CHT's 64.4%
- Lower P/E (0.0x vs 0.8x)
- +83.0% vs CHT's +7.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CHT | 3.3% revenue growth vs SKM's -3.4% |
| Value | SKM | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 0.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | CHT | 16.5% margin vs SKM's 2.4% |
| Stability / Safety | CHT | Beta 0.20 vs SKM's 0.36, lower leverage |
| Dividends | CHT | 3.7% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs SKM's 3.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | SKM | +83.0% vs CHT's +7.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CHT | 7.3% ROA vs SKM's 1.4%, ROIC 9.1% vs 3.8% |
CHT vs SKM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2021
Segment breakdown not available.
CHT vs SKM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCHTLAGGINGSKM
SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd
2leads
CHTChunghwa Telecom Co.,…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SKMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CHT5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SKM5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CHT9/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SKM6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
CHT2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SKM is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.10T annually — 72.7x CHT's $235.1B. CHT is the more profitable business, keeping 16.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SKM's 2.4%. On growth, CHT holds the edge at +1.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CHTChunghwa Telecom … | SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $235.1B | $17.10T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $87.5B | $4.54T |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $38.7B | $408.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $51.3B | $1.33T |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.6% | +90.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.7% | +5.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.5% | +2.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.8% | +7.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.4% | -4.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.4% | -60.7% |
CHT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
SKM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.5x trailing earnings, CHT trades at a 49% valuation discount to SKM's 54.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SKM's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CHT's 12.7x.
| Metric | CHTChunghwa Telecom … | SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $34.0B | $14.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $34.0B | $20.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.53x | 54.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.83x | 0.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 9.11x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.69x | 6.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.51x | 1.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.66x | 1.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.49x | 12.39x |
SKM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHT leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHT delivers a 9.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $3 for SKM. CHT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKM's 0.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHT scores 9/9 vs SKM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | CHTChunghwa Telecom … | SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.8% | +3.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.3% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.1% | +3.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.7% | +4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.86x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $929M | $9.28T |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $37.1B | $1.49T |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $38.0B | $10.77T |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 130.38x | 2.80x |
CHT leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SKM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SKM five years ago would be worth $20,210 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,104 for CHT. Over the past 12 months, SKM leads with a +83.0% total return vs CHT's +7.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SKM at 26.0% vs CHT's 4.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CHTChunghwa Telecom … | SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.0% | +84.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.4% | +83.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.1% | +99.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.0% | +102.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +64.4% | +247.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.8% | +26.0% |
SKM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CHT and SKM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CHT is the less volatile stock with a 0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKM's 0.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | CHTChunghwa Telecom … | SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.20x | 0.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $47.03 | $40.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $39.28 | $19.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.2% | +93.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.1 | 53.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 183K | 1.7M |
Evenly matched — CHT and SKM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
CHT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CHT as "Sell" and SKM as "Hold". For income investors, CHT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.66% vs SKM's 2.99%.
| Metric | CHTChunghwa Telecom … | SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Sell | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.7% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $50.30 | $1661.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CHT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
CHT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SKM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallChunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (CHT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CHT vs SKM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CHT or SKM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Chunghwa Telecom Co.
, Ltd. (CHT) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM). Chunghwa Telecom Co. , Ltd. (CHT) offers the better valuation at 27. 5x trailing P/E (0. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM) a "Hold" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CHT or SKM?
On trailing P/E, Chunghwa Telecom Co.
, Ltd. (CHT) is the cheapest at 27. 5x versus SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd at 54. 3x. On forward P/E, SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd is actually cheaper at 0. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CHT or SKM?
Over the past 5 years, SK Telecom Co.
,Ltd (SKM) delivered a total return of +102. 1%, compared to +21. 0% for Chunghwa Telecom Co. , Ltd. (CHT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SKM returned +247. 9% versus CHT's +64. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CHT or SKM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chunghwa Telecom Co.
, Ltd. (CHT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 20β versus SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd's 0. 36β — meaning SKM is approximately 85% more volatile than CHT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chunghwa Telecom Co. , Ltd. (CHT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 86% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CHT or SKM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chunghwa Telecom Co.
, Ltd. (CHT) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -3. 4% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Chunghwa Telecom Co. , Ltd. grew EPS 4. 2% year-over-year, compared to -68. 0% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd. Over a 3-year CAGR, CHT leads at 3. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CHT or SKM?
Chunghwa Telecom Co.
, Ltd. (CHT) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 4% net margin versus 2. 4% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHT leads at 20. 6% versus 6. 3% for SKM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHT leads at 36. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CHT or SKM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SK Telecom Co.
,Ltd (SKM) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 0. 8x for Chunghwa Telecom Co. , Ltd. — 0. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — CHT or SKM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Chunghwa Telecom Co. , Ltd. (CHT) offers the highest yield at 3. 7%, versus 3. 0% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM).
09Is CHT or SKM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chunghwa Telecom Co.
, Ltd. (CHT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 20), 3. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHT: +64. 4%, SKM: +247. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CHT and SKM?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CHT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; SKM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 54%
- Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Revenue Growth>
%
(CHT: 1.4% · SKM: -4.1%)Net Margin>
%
(CHT: 16.5% · SKM: 2.4%)P/E Ratio<
x
(CHT: 27.5x · SKM: 54.3x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.