Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CIG vs SBS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CIG
Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais

Diversified Utilities

UtilitiesNYSE • BR
Market Cap$6.84B
5Y Perf.+136.6%
SBS
Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Regulated Water

UtilitiesNYSE • BR
Market Cap$21.77B
5Y Perf.+216.9%

CIG vs SBS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CIG logoCIG
SBS logoSBS
IndustryDiversified UtilitiesRegulated Water
Market Cap$6.84B$21.77B
Revenue (TTM)$42.79B$37.34B
Net Income (TTM)$4.93B$8.30B
Gross Margin14.3%36.6%
Operating Margin11.7%32.2%
Forward P/E1.9x0.7x
Total Debt$19.87B$39.99B
Cash & Equiv.$1.90B$4.67B

CIG vs SBSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CIG
SBS
StockMay 20May 26Return
Companhia Energétic… (CIG)100236.6+136.6%
Companhia de Saneam… (SBS)100316.9+216.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CIG vs SBS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SBS leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CIG
Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais
The Income Pick

CIG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.72, yield 11.5%
  • Rev growth 5.3%, EPS growth -31.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 69.6%, current ratio 1.00x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SBS
Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP
The Long-Run Compounder

SBS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 5.3% 10Y total return vs CIG's 315.8%
  • PEG 0.01 vs CIG's 0.11
  • Lower P/E (0.7x vs 1.9x), PEG 0.01 vs 0.11
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCIG logoCIG5.3% revenue growth vs SBS's 3.3%
ValueSBS logoSBSLower P/E (0.7x vs 1.9x), PEG 0.01 vs 0.11
Quality / MarginsSBS logoSBS22.2% margin vs CIG's 11.5%
Stability / SafetyCIG logoCIGBeta 0.72 vs SBS's 0.82, lower leverage
DividendsCIG logoCIG11.5% yield, vs SBS's 2.1%
Momentum (1Y)SBS logoSBS+73.9% vs CIG's +45.5%
Efficiency (ROA)SBS logoSBS8.8% ROA vs CIG's 7.6%, ROIC 13.1% vs 10.5%

CIG vs SBS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CIGCompanhia Energética de Minas Gerais
FY 2020
Receivables from Customers and Traders
39.8%$127M
Reimbursement For Suspension Of Supply Of Power
16.3%$52M
Transactions With Energy
11.0%$35M
Securities
10.3%$33M
Accounts Receivable - AFAC
8.5%$27M
ICMS Tax - Early Payment
3.8%$12M
Reimbursement For Cessation Of Power Purchase Agreement
3.1%$10M
Other (4)
7.2%$23M
SBSCompanhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP

Segment breakdown not available.

CIG vs SBS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCIGLAGGINGSBS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SBS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

CIG and SBS operate at a comparable scale, with $42.8B and $37.3B in trailing revenue. SBS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CIG's 11.5%. On growth, CIG holds the edge at -5.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCIG logoCIGCompanhia Energét…SBS logoSBSCompanhia de Sane…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$42.8B$37.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$6.5B$14.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$4.9B$8.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$2.6B$13.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+14.3%+36.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+11.7%+32.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+11.5%+22.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-6.0%+35.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-5.1%-26.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+88.6%+10.6%
SBS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CIG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 7.0x trailing earnings, CIG trades at a 47% valuation discount to SBS's 13.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SBS offers better value at 0.24x vs CIG's 0.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCIG logoCIGCompanhia Energét…SBS logoSBSCompanhia de Sane…
Market CapShares × price$6.8B$21.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$10.5B$28.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS6.96x13.03x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.1.85x0.66x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.62x0.24x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.00x10.08x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.81x2.89x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.18x2.55x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
CIG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CIG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

SBS delivers a 20.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $17 for CIG. CIG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.70x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SBS's 0.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CIG scores 4/9 vs SBS's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.

MetricCIG logoCIGCompanhia Energét…SBS logoSBSCompanhia de Sane…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+17.3%+20.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+7.6%+8.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+10.5%+13.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+12.0%+15.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–943
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.70x0.94x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$18.0B$35.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.9B$4.7B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$19.9B$40.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.75x2.86x
CIG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SBS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SBS five years ago would be worth $51,513 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $23,750 for CIG. Over the past 12 months, SBS leads with a +73.9% total return vs CIG's +45.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SBS at 62.2% vs CIG's 17.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCIG logoCIGCompanhia Energét…SBS logoSBSCompanhia de Sane…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+17.8%+34.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+45.5%+73.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+63.8%+326.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+137.5%+415.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+315.8%+528.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+17.9%+62.2%
SBS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

CIG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

CIG is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SBS's 0.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CIG currently trades 86.6% from its 52-week high vs SBS's 23.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCIG logoCIGCompanhia Energét…SBS logoSBSCompanhia de Sane…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.72x0.82x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.76$26.61
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.75$3.78
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+86.6%+23.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10042.552.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded6.6M19.2M
CIG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — CIG and SBS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates CIG as "Buy" and SBS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 273.5% upside for SBS (target: $24) vs -12.1% for CIG (target: $2). For income investors, CIG offers the higher dividend yield at 11.49% vs SBS's 2.15%.

MetricCIG logoCIGCompanhia Energét…SBS logoSBSCompanhia de Sane…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$2.10$23.79
# AnalystsCovering analysts57
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+11.5%+2.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.36$0.68
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.4%
Evenly matched — CIG and SBS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CIG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SBS leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallCompanhia Energética de Min… (CIG)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CIG vs SBS: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CIG or SBS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais (CIG) is the stronger pick with 5.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS). Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais (CIG) offers the better valuation at 7. 0x trailing P/E (1. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais (CIG) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CIG or SBS?

On trailing P/E, Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais (CIG) is the cheapest at 7.

0x versus Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP at 13. 0x. On forward P/E, Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP is actually cheaper at 0. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP wins at 0. 01x versus Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais's 0. 11x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CIG or SBS?

Over the past 5 years, Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS) delivered a total return of +415.

1%, compared to +137. 5% for Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais (CIG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBS returned +528. 6% versus CIG's +315. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CIG or SBS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais (CIG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

72β versus Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP's 0. 82β — meaning SBS is approximately 15% more volatile than CIG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais (CIG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 70% versus 94% for Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CIG or SBS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais (CIG) is pulling ahead at 5.

3% versus 3. 3% for Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP grew EPS -13. 6% year-over-year, compared to -31. 7% for Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais. Over a 3-year CAGR, SBS leads at 19. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CIG or SBS?

Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS) is the more profitable company, earning 22.

2% net margin versus 11. 5% for Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais — meaning it keeps 22. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SBS leads at 32. 2% versus 14. 1% for CIG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SBS leads at 36. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CIG or SBS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 01x versus Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais's 0. 11x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS) trades at 0. 7x forward P/E versus 1. 9x for Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais — 1. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SBS: 273. 5% to $23. 79.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CIG or SBS?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais (CIG) offers the highest yield at 11. 5%, versus 2. 1% for Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS).

09

Is CIG or SBS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

82), 2. 1% yield, +528. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBS: +528. 6%, CIG: +315. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CIG and SBS?

Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

CIG

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 4.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SBS

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CIG and SBS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CIG: -5.1% · SBS: -26.9%)
Net Margin>
%
(CIG: 11.5% · SBS: 22.2%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CIG: 7.0x · SBS: 13.0x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.