Security & Protection Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CIGL vs FEDU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
CIGL vs FEDU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Security & Protection Services | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $44M | $2M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $251M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-84M | $801K |
| Gross Margin | 34.5% | 18.8% |
| Operating Margin | -8.0% | -6.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.8x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $98M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $211M |
CIGL vs FEDU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concorde Internatio… (CIGL) | 100 | 47.4 | -52.6% |
| Four Seasons Educat… (FEDU) | 100 | 139.2 | +39.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CIGL vs FEDU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CIGL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -50.3% 10Y total return vs FEDU's -88.5%
FEDU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.29, yield 100.0%
- Rev growth 100.1%, EPS growth -81.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.29, Low D/E 19.5%, current ratio 2.19x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 100.1% revenue growth vs CIGL's -1.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.3% margin vs CIGL's -8.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.29 vs CIGL's 3.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.0% vs CIGL's -71.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.1% ROA vs CIGL's -8.9%, ROIC -3.0% vs -8.9% |
CIGL vs FEDU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CIGL vs FEDU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FEDU leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FEDU is the larger business by revenue, generating $251M annually — 23.9x CIGL's $10M. FEDU is the more profitable business, keeping 0.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CIGL's -8.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $251M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $801,000 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.5% | +18.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.0% | -6.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.0% | +0.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -15.4% | -14.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +83.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -12.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FEDU leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $44M | $2M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $50M | -$14M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.53x | 18.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.20x | 0.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 19.49x | 0.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FEDU leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FEDU delivers a 0.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $0 in annual profit, vs $-34 for CIGL. FEDU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CIGL's 2.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FEDU scores 5/9 vs CIGL's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -33.7% | +0.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.9% | +0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.9% | -3.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.6% | -2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.88x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | -$112M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $211M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $98M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -382.50x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FEDU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FEDU five years ago would be worth $5,921 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,975 for CIGL. Over the past 12 months, FEDU leads with a +38.0% total return vs CIGL's -71.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FEDU at 9.3% vs CIGL's -20.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.1% | -10.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -71.3% | +38.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.3% | +30.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.3% | -40.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.3% | -88.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.8% | +9.3% |
Risk & Volatility
FEDU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FEDU is the less volatile stock with a 0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CIGL's 3.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FEDU currently trades 60.6% from its 52-week high vs CIGL's 6.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.40x | 0.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.06 | $17.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.40 | $6.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.4% | +60.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.7 | 50.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 81K | 1K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
FEDU is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +100.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $164.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FEDU leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
CIGL vs FEDU: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CIGL or FEDU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc.
(FEDU) is the stronger pick with 100. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for Concorde International Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (CIGL). Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc. (FEDU) offers the better valuation at 18. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc. (FEDU) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CIGL or FEDU?
Over the past 5 years, Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc.
(FEDU) delivered a total return of -40. 8%, compared to -50. 3% for Concorde International Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (CIGL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CIGL returned -50. 3% versus FEDU's -88. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CIGL or FEDU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc.
(FEDU) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 29β versus Concorde International Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares's 3. 40β — meaning CIGL is approximately 1079% more volatile than FEDU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc. (FEDU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 3% for Concorde International Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CIGL or FEDU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc.
(FEDU) is pulling ahead at 100. 1% versus -1. 6% for Concorde International Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (CIGL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc. grew EPS -81. 9% year-over-year, compared to -88. 1% for Concorde International Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CIGL or FEDU?
Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc.
(FEDU) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 3% net margin versus -797. 3% for Concorde International Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 0. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FEDU leads at -6. 3% versus -797. 2% for CIGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CIGL leads at 34. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CIGL or FEDU?
In this comparison, FEDU (100.
0% yield) pays a dividend. CIGL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is CIGL or FEDU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc.
(FEDU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 29), 100. 0% yield). Concorde International Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (CIGL) carries a higher beta of 3. 40 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FEDU: -88. 5%, CIGL: -50. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CIGL and FEDU?
These companies operate in different sectors (CIGL (Industrials) and FEDU (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CIGL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FEDU is a small-cap high-growth stock. FEDU pays a dividend while CIGL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Consumer Defensive
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 41%
- Dividend Yield > 40.0%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.