Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CIVI vs SM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
CIVI vs SM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $2.34B | $3.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.71B | $3.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $638M | $131M |
| Gross Margin | 43.9% | 45.1% |
| Operating Margin | 31.1% | 6.5% |
| Forward P/E | 6.8x | 4.4x |
| Total Debt | $4.49B | $2.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $76M | $368M |
CIVI vs SM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Jan 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Civitas Resources, … (CIVI) | 100 | 162.0 | +62.0% |
| SM Energy Company (SM) | 100 | 531.3 | +431.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CIVI vs SM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CIVI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 49.8%, EPS growth -6.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 77.5%
- 49.8% revenue growth vs SM's 18.1%
- 13.6% margin vs SM's 3.4%
SM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.16, yield 2.7%
- 132.6% 10Y total return vs CIVI's -86.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.16, Low D/E 47.7%, current ratio 0.69x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 49.8% revenue growth vs SM's 18.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.4x vs 6.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.6% margin vs SM's 3.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.16 vs CIVI's 1.10, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 18.2% yield, vs SM's 2.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.1% vs CIVI's +6.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.2% ROA vs SM's 1.1%, ROIC 10.8% vs 8.9% |
CIVI vs SM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CIVI vs SM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIVI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIVI and SM operate at a comparable scale, with $4.7B and $3.8B in trailing revenue. CIVI is the more profitable business, keeping 13.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SM's 3.4%. On growth, SM holds the edge at +76.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.7B | $3.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.4B | $1.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $638M | $131M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $934M | -$226M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.9% | +45.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.1% | +6.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +3.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.8% | -5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.1% | +76.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.9% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
CIVI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, CIVI trades at a 37% valuation discount to SM's 5.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CIVI's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SM's 2.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.8B | $5.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.24x | 5.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.75x | 4.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.15x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.89x | 2.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.45x | 1.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.41x | 0.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.61x | 5.84x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CIVI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CIVI delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $2 for SM. SM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CIVI's 0.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SM scores 7/9 vs CIVI's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.5% | +2.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.2% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.8% | +8.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.1% | +10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.68x | 0.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.4B | $1.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $76M | $368M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.5B | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.80x | 1.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SM five years ago would be worth $17,892 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,194 for CIVI. Over the past 12 months, SM leads with a +41.1% total return vs CIVI's +6.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SM at 5.9% vs CIVI's -16.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.5% | +53.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.8% | +41.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.7% | +18.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.9% | +78.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.2% | +132.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.5% | +5.9% |
Risk & Volatility
SM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SM is the less volatile stock with a 0.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CIVI's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SM currently trades 87.5% from its 52-week high vs CIVI's 73.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 0.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.45 | $33.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.38 | $17.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.1% | +87.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.8 | 47.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 22.4M | 5.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CIVI and SM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CIVI as "Hold" and SM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.2% upside for CIVI (target: $31) vs -0.3% for SM (target: $29). For income investors, CIVI offers the higher dividend yield at 18.19% vs SM's 2.75%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.00 | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 54 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +18.2% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.98 | $0.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +18.3% | +0.4% |
CIVI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SM leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
CIVI vs SM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CIVI or SM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the stronger pick with 49. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 18. 1% for SM Energy Company (SM). Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SM Energy Company (SM) a "Buy" — based on 54 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CIVI or SM?
On trailing P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus SM Energy Company at 5. 2x. On forward P/E, SM Energy Company is actually cheaper at 4. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CIVI or SM?
Over the past 5 years, SM Energy Company (SM) delivered a total return of +78.
9%, compared to +31. 9% for Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SM returned +132. 6% versus CIVI's -86. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CIVI or SM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SM Energy Company (SM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
16β versus Civitas Resources, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning CIVI is approximately 566% more volatile than SM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SM Energy Company (SM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 48% versus 68% for Civitas Resources, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CIVI or SM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is pulling ahead at 49. 8% versus 18. 1% for SM Energy Company (SM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Civitas Resources, Inc. grew EPS -6. 2% year-over-year, compared to -15. 4% for SM Energy Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIVI leads at 77. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CIVI or SM?
SM Energy Company (SM) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
5% net margin versus 16. 1% for Civitas Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CIVI leads at 29. 0% versus 26. 1% for SM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CIVI leads at 41. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CIVI or SM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SM Energy Company (SM) trades at 4.
4x forward P/E versus 6. 8x for Civitas Resources, Inc. — 2. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CIVI: 13. 2% to $31. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CIVI or SM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the highest yield at 18. 2%, versus 2. 7% for SM Energy Company (SM).
09Is CIVI or SM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SM Energy Company (SM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
16), 2. 7% yield, +132. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SM: +132. 6%, CIVI: -86. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CIVI and SM?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.