Security & Protection Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CIX vs MLI vs KALU vs ATI vs CMC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Aluminum
Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Steel
CIX vs MLI vs KALU vs ATI vs CMC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Security & Protection Services | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Aluminum | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Steel |
| Market Cap | $293M | $15.29B | $2.86B | $22.26B | $7.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $159M | $4.37B | $3.70B | $4.59B | $8.01B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $20M | $847M | $153M | $426M | $438M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 27.8% | 10.2% | 22.5% | 16.5% |
| Operating Margin | 15.0% | 22.9% | 6.6% | 14.5% | 7.5% |
| Forward P/E | 88.0x | 17.0x | 18.7x | 37.9x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $46M | $1.12B | $1.95B | $1.35B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $54M | $1.37B | $7M | $417M | $1.04B |
CIX vs MLI vs KALU vs ATI vs CMC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CompX International… (CIX) | 100 | 168.8 | +68.8% |
| Mueller Industries,… (MLI) | 100 | 1029.1 | +929.1% |
| Kaiser Aluminum Cor… (KALU) | 100 | 245.5 | +145.5% |
| ATI Inc. (ATI) | 100 | 1873.2 | +1773.2% |
| Commercial Metals C… (CMC) | 100 | 410.8 | +310.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CIX vs MLI vs KALU vs ATI vs CMC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CIX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.50, yield 9.3%
- Beta 0.50, yield 9.3%, current ratio 5.87x
- Beta 0.50 vs KALU's 1.71
- 9.3% yield, vs MLI's 0.7%
MLI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.11, Low D/E 1.8%, current ratio 5.92x
- PEG 0.42 vs CIX's 6.40
- Lower P/E (17.0x vs 37.9x)
- 19.4% margin vs KALU's 4.1%
KALU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 11.5%, EPS growth 135.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.5%
- 11.5% revenue growth vs CMC's -1.6%
- +169.4% vs CIX's +0.2%
ATI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 10.5% 10Y total return vs MLI's 8.5%
Among these 5 stocks, CMC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.5% revenue growth vs CMC's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.0x vs 37.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.4% margin vs KALU's 4.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs KALU's 1.71 | |
| Dividends | 9.3% yield, vs MLI's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +169.4% vs CIX's +0.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 23.9% ROA vs CMC's 4.7%, ROIC 44.7% vs 8.5% |
CIX vs MLI vs KALU vs ATI vs CMC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CIX vs MLI vs KALU vs ATI vs CMC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MLI leads in 2 of 6 categories
CIX leads 1 • ATI leads 1 • KALU leads 0 • CMC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MLI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMC is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.0B annually — 50.5x CIX's $159M. MLI is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KALU's 4.1%. On growth, KALU holds the edge at +42.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $159M | $4.4B | $3.7B | $4.6B | $8.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $1.1B | $368M | $837M | $890M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $20M | $847M | $153M | $426M | $438M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $22M | $652M | $24M | $552M | $296M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.1% | +27.8% | +10.2% | +22.5% | +16.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | +22.9% | +6.6% | +14.5% | +7.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.7% | +19.4% | +4.1% | +9.3% | +5.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | +14.9% | +0.7% | +12.0% | +3.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.7% | +19.3% | +42.4% | +0.6% | +11.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.3% | +55.4% | +183.2% | +26.9% | +2.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CIX leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.0x trailing earnings, CIX trades at a 84% valuation discount to CMC's 95.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MLI offers better value at 0.49x vs CIX's 1.09x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $293M | $15.3B | $2.9B | $22.3B | $7.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $239M | $14.0B | $4.0B | $23.8B | $8.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.03x | 20.09x | 26.02x | 57.05x | 95.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 87.96x | 17.02x | 18.74x | 37.92x | 10.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.09x | 0.49x | 0.86x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.09x | 14.49x | 12.68x | 29.30x | 10.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.85x | 3.66x | 0.85x | 4.85x | 1.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.11x | 6.06x | 3.54x | 12.03x | 1.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.30x | 22.27x | — | 66.72x | 25.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MLI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MLI delivers a 28.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $10 for CMC. MLI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KALU's 1.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ATI scores 8/9 vs CMC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.3% | +28.4% | +18.7% | +22.7% | +10.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.8% | +23.9% | +5.9% | +8.4% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.0% | +44.7% | +7.8% | +14.5% | +8.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.8% | +32.6% | +9.4% | +15.6% | +8.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.02x | 1.36x | 1.02x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$54M | -$1.3B | $1.1B | $1.5B | $311M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $54M | $1.4B | $7M | $417M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $46M | $1.1B | $1.9B | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 13483.55x | 4.84x | 6.78x | 9.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ATI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ATI five years ago would be worth $67,270 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,068 for KALU. Over the past 12 months, KALU leads with a +169.4% total return vs CIX's +0.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ATI at 62.7% vs CIX's 16.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.6% | +18.3% | +47.7% | +36.4% | -1.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.2% | +88.2% | +169.4% | +133.1% | +58.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.6% | +274.8% | +193.5% | +330.9% | +63.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.0% | +490.9% | +40.7% | +572.7% | +127.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +223.2% | +847.6% | +135.1% | +1050.2% | +356.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.1% | +55.3% | +43.2% | +62.7% | +17.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CIX and MLI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CIX is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KALU's 1.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MLI currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs CIX's 73.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.50x | 1.11x | 1.71x | 1.51x | 1.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.30 | $140.84 | $183.00 | $171.11 | $84.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.29 | $72.16 | $65.69 | $68.63 | $44.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.5% | +97.8% | +96.3% | +95.0% | +83.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.7 | 68.2 | 74.2 | 61.0 | 63.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 679K | 248K | 1.9M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CIX and MLI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MLI as "Hold", KALU as "Hold", ATI as "Buy", CMC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 17.4% upside for CMC (target: $83) vs -9.2% for KALU (target: $160). For income investors, CIX offers the higher dividend yield at 9.26% vs MLI's 0.71%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $160.00 | $173.40 | $82.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 | 22 | 29 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.3% | +0.7% | +1.8% | +0.1% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.20 | $0.98 | $3.09 | $0.09 | $0.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.6% | 0.0% | +2.1% | +2.7% |
MLI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CIX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CIX vs MLI vs KALU vs ATI vs CMC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CIX or MLI or KALU or ATI or CMC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) is the stronger pick with 11.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for Commercial Metals Company (CMC). CompX International Inc. (CIX) offers the better valuation at 15. 0x trailing P/E (88. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ATI Inc. (ATI) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CIX or MLI or KALU or ATI or CMC?
On trailing P/E, CompX International Inc.
(CIX) is the cheapest at 15. 0x versus Commercial Metals Company at 95. 3x. On forward P/E, Commercial Metals Company is actually cheaper at 10. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Mueller Industries, Inc. wins at 0. 42x versus CompX International Inc. 's 6. 40x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CIX or MLI or KALU or ATI or CMC?
Over the past 5 years, ATI Inc.
(ATI) delivered a total return of +572. 7%, compared to +40. 7% for Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ATI returned +1050% versus KALU's +135. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CIX or MLI or KALU or ATI or CMC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CompX International Inc.
(CIX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus Kaiser Aluminum Corporation's 1. 71β — meaning KALU is approximately 243% more volatile than CIX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 136% for Kaiser Aluminum Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CIX or MLI or KALU or ATI or CMC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) is pulling ahead at 11.
5% versus -1. 6% for Commercial Metals Company (CMC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kaiser Aluminum Corporation grew EPS 135. 9% year-over-year, compared to -82. 1% for Commercial Metals Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, ATI leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CIX or MLI or KALU or ATI or CMC?
Mueller Industries, Inc.
(MLI) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 3% net margin versus 1. 1% for Commercial Metals Company — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MLI leads at 21. 4% versus 5. 7% for KALU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CIX leads at 30. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CIX or MLI or KALU or ATI or CMC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 42x versus CompX International Inc. 's 6. 40x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Commercial Metals Company (CMC) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 88. 0x for CompX International Inc. — 77. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CMC: 17. 4% to $82. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — CIX or MLI or KALU or ATI or CMC?
In this comparison, CIX (9.
3% yield), KALU (1. 8% yield), CMC (1. 0% yield), MLI (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. ATI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CIX or MLI or KALU or ATI or CMC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CompX International Inc.
(CIX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50), 9. 3% yield, +223. 2% 10Y return). Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) carries a higher beta of 1. 71 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CIX: +223. 2%, KALU: +135. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CIX and MLI and KALU and ATI and CMC?
These companies operate in different sectors (CIX (Industrials) and MLI (Industrials) and KALU (Basic Materials) and ATI (Industrials) and CMC (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CIX is a small-cap deep-value stock; MLI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KALU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ATI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CMC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CIX, MLI, KALU, CMC pay a dividend while ATI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.