CJET
Chijet Motor Company, Inc.
Auto - Manufacturers
Market Cap$93K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CJET vs LI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
LI
Li Auto Inc.
Auto - Manufacturers
Market Cap$35.58B
5Y Perf.-36.3%
CJET vs LI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CJET | LI |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $93K | $35.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16M | $125.72B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-115M | $4.51B |
| Gross Margin | -351.2% | 19.4% |
| Operating Margin | -8.9% | 2.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.4x |
| Total Debt | $364M | $16.34B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $65.90B |
CJET vs LI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CJET
LI
| Stock | Jan 22 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chijet Motor Compan… (CJET) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Li Auto Inc. (LI) | 100 | 63.7 | -36.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CJET vs LI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: LI leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Chijet Motor Company, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CJET
Chijet Motor Company, Inc.
The Income Pick
CJET is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.72
- Lower volatility, beta 0.72, current ratio 0.11x
- Beta 0.72, current ratio 0.11x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
LI
Li Auto Inc.
The Growth Play
LI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 16.7%, EPS growth -31.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 75.7%
- 7.7% 10Y total return vs CJET's -100.0%
- 16.7% revenue growth vs CJET's -27.1%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | LI | 16.7% revenue growth vs CJET's -27.1% |
| Quality / Margins | LI | 3.6% margin vs CJET's -7.0% |
| Stability / Safety | CJET | Beta 0.72 vs LI's 0.94 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | LI | -31.0% vs CJET's -99.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | LI | 2.8% ROA vs CJET's -24.4%, ROIC 209.3% vs -17.3% |
CJET vs LI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
CJET vs LI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLLILAGGINGCJET
CJETChijet Motor Company,…
1leads
LILi Auto Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CJETMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
LI5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CJET2/2
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
LI5/6
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
LI5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LI is the larger business by revenue, generating $125.7B annually — 7666.9x CJET's $16M. LI is the more profitable business, keeping 3.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CJET's -7.0%. On growth, LI holds the edge at -36.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CJETChijet Motor Comp… | LILi Auto Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16M | $125.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$88M | $5.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$115M | $4.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$72M | -$7.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | +19.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.9% | +2.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.0% | +3.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | -6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -48.9% | -36.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.6% | -123.3% |
LI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CJET leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CJETChijet Motor Comp… | LILi Auto Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $92,557 | $35.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $360M | $28.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | 16.02x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | 1.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 29.57x |
CJET leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LI scores 5/9 vs CJET's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | CJETChijet Motor Comp… | LILi Auto Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +6.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -24.4% | +2.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -17.3% | +2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +7.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $360M | -$49.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $65.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $364M | $16.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.60x | 28.54x |
LI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LI five years ago would be worth $9,850 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for CJET. Over the past 12 months, LI leads with a -31.0% total return vs CJET's -99.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LI at -10.5% vs CJET's -95.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CJETChijet Motor Comp… | LILi Auto Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +344.5% | +2.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.1% | -31.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -28.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -1.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +7.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -95.4% | -10.5% |
LI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CJET and LI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CJET is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LI's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LI currently trades 55.3% from its 52-week high vs CJET's 0.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CJETChijet Motor Comp… | LILi Auto Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $286.00 | $32.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.34 | $15.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.6% | +55.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.9 | 45.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 42K | 3.0M |
Evenly matched — CJET and LI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | CJETChijet Motor Comp… | LILi Auto Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $20.01 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
LI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CJET leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallLi Auto Inc. (LI)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CJET vs LI: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CJET or LI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Li Auto Inc.
(LI) is the stronger pick with 16. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -27. 1% for Chijet Motor Company, Inc. (CJET). Li Auto Inc. (LI) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (11. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Li Auto Inc. (LI) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CJET or LI?
Over the past 5 years, Li Auto Inc.
(LI) delivered a total return of -1. 5%, compared to -100. 0% for Chijet Motor Company, Inc. (CJET). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LI returned +7. 7% versus CJET's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CJET or LI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chijet Motor Company, Inc.
(CJET) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 72β versus Li Auto Inc. 's 0. 94β — meaning LI is approximately 31% more volatile than CJET relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — CJET or LI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Li Auto Inc.
(LI) is pulling ahead at 16. 7% versus -27. 1% for Chijet Motor Company, Inc. (CJET). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Chijet Motor Company, Inc. grew EPS 32. 9% year-over-year, compared to -31. 8% for Li Auto Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LI leads at 75. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CJET or LI?
Li Auto Inc.
(LI) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 6% net margin versus -678. 2% for Chijet Motor Company, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LI leads at 4. 4% versus -828. 3% for CJET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LI leads at 20. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CJET or LI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is CJET or LI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chijet Motor Company, Inc.
(CJET) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 72)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CJET: -100. 0%, LI: +7. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CJET and LI?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CJET is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LI is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CJET: -48.9% · LI: -36.5%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.