Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CKX vs PINE vs STRW vs NTST vs FCPT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
CKX vs PINE vs STRW vs NTST vs FCPT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | REIT - Retail | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $22M | $281M | $170M | $1.70B | $2.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $897K | $65M | $145M | $176M | $301M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $475K | $-415K | $7M | $185K | $117M |
| Gross Margin | 93.9% | -4.1% | 81.4% | 92.4% | 98.0% |
| Operating Margin | 34.5% | 28.0% | 54.3% | 27.7% | 56.0% |
| Forward P/E | 89.3x | 59.3x | 19.4x | 64.8x | 21.8x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $394M | $672M | $0.00 | $1.21B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $5M | $48M | $14M | $12M |
CKX vs PINE vs STRW vs NTST vs FCPT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CKX Lands, Inc. (CKX) | 100 | 98.1 | -1.9% |
| Alpine Income Prope… (PINE) | 100 | 121.1 | +21.1% |
| Strawberry Fields R… (STRW) | 100 | 125.7 | +25.7% |
| NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) | 100 | 114.3 | +14.3% |
| Four Corners Proper… (FCPT) | 100 | 105.3 | +5.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CKX vs PINE vs STRW vs NTST vs FCPT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CKX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality.
- 52.9% margin vs PINE's -0.6%
PINE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +37.3% vs FCPT's -3.0%
STRW is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 47.8% 10Y total return vs FCPT's 99.1%
- Lower P/E (19.4x vs 21.8x)
NTST has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 30.0%, EPS growth 150.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.2%
- 30.0% FFO/revenue growth vs CKX's 2.4%
- Beta 0.05 vs STRW's 0.69
FCPT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 5.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.14, Low D/E 74.2%, current ratio 0.30x
- Beta 0.14, yield 5.5%, current ratio 0.30x
- 5.5% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs NTST's 4.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.0% FFO/revenue growth vs CKX's 2.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.4x vs 21.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 52.9% margin vs PINE's -0.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs STRW's 0.69 | |
| Dividends | 5.5% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs NTST's 4.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.3% vs FCPT's -3.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.1% ROA vs PINE's -0.1%, ROIC 4.5% vs 2.2% |
CKX vs PINE vs STRW vs NTST vs FCPT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CKX vs PINE vs STRW vs NTST vs FCPT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
STRW leads in 2 of 6 categories
NTST leads 1 • FCPT leads 1 • CKX leads 0 • PINE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CKX and FCPT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCPT is the larger business by revenue, generating $301M annually — 335.2x CKX's $897,333. CKX is the more profitable business, keeping 52.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PINE's -0.6%. On growth, CKX holds the edge at +35.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $897,333 | $65M | $145M | $176M | $301M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $313,061 | $45M | $123M | $133M | $231M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $475,078 | -$415,000 | $7M | $185,000 | $117M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $433,651 | -$46M | $88M | $106M | $188M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +93.9% | -4.1% | +81.4% | +92.4% | +98.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +34.5% | +28.0% | +54.3% | +27.7% | +56.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +52.9% | -0.6% | +4.8% | +0.1% | +38.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +48.3% | -71.7% | +60.7% | +59.9% | +62.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.8% | +29.6% | +34.8% | +27.7% | +9.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +185.7% | +6.7% | +110.6% | +7.7% |
Valuation Metrics
STRW leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.7x trailing earnings, STRW trades at a 91% valuation discount to NTST's 254.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NTST offers better value at 4.35x vs FCPT's 118.24x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22M | $281M | $170M | $1.7B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19M | $671M | $793M | $1.7B | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 89.33x | -89.27x | 22.72x | 254.50x | 23.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 59.32x | 19.44x | 64.78x | 21.81x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 4.35x | 118.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 153.19x | 14.63x | 8.31x | 12.34x | 17.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 14.47x | 4.65x | 1.45x | 8.72x | 9.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.19x | 1.01x | 1.10x | 1.18x | 1.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 107.49x | — | 4.81x | 15.52x | 14.54x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — STRW and FCPT each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STRW delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-0 for PINE. FCPT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.74x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STRW's 8.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STRW scores 7/9 vs PINE's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.5% | -0.1% | +11.2% | +0.0% | +7.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.5% | -0.1% | +0.8% | +0.0% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.7% | +2.2% | +7.2% | +2.1% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.6% | +2.8% | +9.0% | +2.1% | +6.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.31x | 8.04x | — | 0.74x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $390M | $623M | -$14M | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $5M | $48M | $14M | $12M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $394M | $672M | $0 | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.82x | 1.82x | — | 3.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STRW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STRW five years ago would be worth $14,780 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,860 for CKX. Over the past 12 months, PINE leads with a +37.3% total return vs FCPT's -3.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STRW at 27.9% vs CKX's 4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.2% | +18.8% | +1.0% | +15.8% | +11.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.1% | +37.3% | +29.7% | +32.6% | -3.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.4% | +46.6% | +109.3% | +27.0% | +14.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.4% | +41.2% | +47.8% | +14.9% | +17.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.8% | +38.3% | +47.8% | +40.7% | +99.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.0% | +13.6% | +27.9% | +8.3% | +4.5% |
Risk & Volatility
NTST leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTST is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STRW's 0.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTST currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs CKX's 80.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.30x | 0.33x | 0.69x | 0.05x | 0.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.25 | $20.80 | $14.00 | $21.30 | $28.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.66 | $13.10 | $9.46 | $15.24 | $22.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.9% | +94.4% | +92.5% | +95.6% | +90.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 54.0 | 51.6 | 57.7 | 55.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 176K | 23K | 1.2M | 658K |
Analyst Outlook
FCPT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PINE as "Buy", STRW as "Buy", NTST as "Buy", FCPT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 18.4% upside for STRW (target: $15) vs 5.7% for PINE (target: $21). For income investors, FCPT offers the higher dividend yield at 5.49% vs PINE's 0.18%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $20.75 | $15.33 | $22.03 | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 2 | 18 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% | +4.4% | +4.1% | +5.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.04 | $0.57 | $0.83 | $1.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +3.1% | +1.5% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
STRW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). NTST leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
CKX vs PINE vs STRW vs NTST vs FCPT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CKX or PINE or STRW or NTST or FCPT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the stronger pick with 30. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 4% for CKX Lands, Inc. (CKX). Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) offers the better valuation at 22. 7x trailing P/E (19. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CKX or PINE or STRW or NTST or FCPT?
On trailing P/E, Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) is the cheapest at 22.
7x versus NETSTREIT Corp. at 254. 5x. On forward P/E, Strawberry Fields REIT LLC is actually cheaper at 19. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NETSTREIT Corp. wins at 1. 11x versus Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. 's 118. 24x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CKX or PINE or STRW or NTST or FCPT?
Over the past 5 years, Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) delivered a total return of +47.
8%, compared to -11. 4% for CKX Lands, Inc. (CKX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FCPT returned +99. 1% versus CKX's -8. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CKX or PINE or STRW or NTST or FCPT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 05β versus Strawberry Fields REIT LLC's 0. 69β — meaning STRW is approximately 1297% more volatile than NTST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 74% versus 8% for Strawberry Fields REIT LLC — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CKX or PINE or STRW or NTST or FCPT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is pulling ahead at 30. 0% versus 2. 4% for CKX Lands, Inc. (CKX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NETSTREIT Corp. grew EPS 150. 0% year-over-year, compared to -257. 1% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTST leads at 28. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CKX or PINE or STRW or NTST or FCPT?
Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
(FCPT) is the more profitable company, earning 38. 2% net margin versus -4. 4% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 38. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FCPT leads at 55. 7% versus 7. 7% for CKX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTST leads at 99. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CKX or PINE or STRW or NTST or FCPT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 11x versus Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. 's 118. 24x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) trades at 19. 4x forward P/E versus 64. 8x for NETSTREIT Corp. — 45. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STRW: 18. 4% to $15. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — CKX or PINE or STRW or NTST or FCPT?
In this comparison, FCPT (5.
5% yield), STRW (4. 4% yield), NTST (4. 1% yield), PINE (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. CKX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CKX or PINE or STRW or NTST or FCPT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 05), 4. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTST: +40. 7%, CKX: -8. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CKX and PINE and STRW and NTST and FCPT?
These companies operate in different sectors (CKX (Energy) and PINE (Real Estate) and STRW (Real Estate) and NTST (Real Estate) and FCPT (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CKX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PINE is a small-cap high-growth stock; STRW is a small-cap high-growth stock; NTST is a small-cap high-growth stock; FCPT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. STRW, NTST, FCPT pay a dividend while CKX, PINE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.