Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CKX vs SOC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Drilling
CKX vs SOC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Drilling |
| Market Cap | $22M | $1.84T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $897K | $1M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $475K | $-498M |
| Gross Margin | 93.9% | -8.7% |
| Operating Margin | 34.5% | -367.6% |
| Forward P/E | 89.3x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $98M |
CKX vs SOC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CKX Lands, Inc. (CKX) | 100 | 94.1 | -5.9% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 132.5 | +32.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CKX vs SOC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CKX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.30
- Rev growth 2.4%, EPS growth 71.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.30, current ratio 36.26x
SOC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 32.4% 10Y total return vs CKX's -8.8%
- 9.5% revenue growth vs CKX's 2.4%
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 89.3x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.5% revenue growth vs CKX's 2.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 89.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 52.9% margin vs SOC's -391.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.30 vs SOC's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +4.1% vs SOC's -36.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.5% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC 0.7% vs -44.6% |
CKX vs SOC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CKX vs SOC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CKX leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SOC and CKX operate at a comparable scale, with $1M and $897,333 in trailing revenue. CKX is the more profitable business, keeping 52.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOC's -391.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $897,333 | $1M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $313,061 | -$454M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $475,078 | -$498M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $433,651 | -$611M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +93.9% | -8.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +34.5% | -367.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +52.9% | -391.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +48.3% | -480.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | -5.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CKX and SOC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22M | $1.84T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19M | $1.84T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 89.33x | -3.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 153.19x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 14.47x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.19x | 2359.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 107.49x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CKX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CKX delivers a 2.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-114 for SOC. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CKX scores 5/9 vs SOC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.5% | -113.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.5% | -28.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.7% | -44.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.6% | -37.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | -$98M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -2.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SOC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SOC five years ago would be worth $13,264 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,860 for CKX. Over the past 12 months, CKX leads with a +4.1% total return vs SOC's -36.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SOC at 8.2% vs CKX's 4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.2% | +9.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.1% | -36.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.4% | +26.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.4% | +32.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.8% | +32.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.0% | +8.2% |
Risk & Volatility
CKX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CKX is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOC's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CKX currently trades 80.9% from its 52-week high vs SOC's 36.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.30x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.25 | $35.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.66 | $3.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.9% | +36.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 45.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 5.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | 0.0% |
CKX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SOC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
CKX vs SOC: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CKX or SOC a better buy right now?
CKX Lands, Inc.
(CKX) offers the better valuation at 89. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CKX or SOC?
Over the past 5 years, Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) delivered a total return of +32. 6%, compared to -11. 4% for CKX Lands, Inc. (CKX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SOC returned +32. 4% versus CKX's -8. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CKX or SOC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CKX Lands, Inc.
(CKX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 30β versus Sable Offshore Corp. 's 1. 51β — meaning SOC is approximately 401% more volatile than CKX relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — CKX or SOC?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CKX Lands, Inc.
grew EPS 71. 4% year-over-year, compared to 40. 6% for Sable Offshore Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CKX or SOC?
CKX Lands, Inc.
(CKX) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 4% net margin versus -391. 5% for Sable Offshore Corp. — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CKX leads at 7. 7% versus -367. 6% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CKX leads at 95. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CKX or SOC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is CKX or SOC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CKX Lands, Inc.
(CKX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 30)). Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CKX: -8. 8%, SOC: +32. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CKX and SOC?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.