Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CLBT vs IIIV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
CLBT vs IIIV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $3.38B | $506M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $476M | $223M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $78M | $16M |
| Gross Margin | 84.2% | 60.4% |
| Operating Margin | 14.0% | 0.8% |
| Forward P/E | 37.5x | 20.3x |
| Total Debt | $23M | $8M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $124M | $67M |
CLBT vs IIIV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) | 100 | 138.7 | +38.7% |
| i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV) | 100 | 82.1 | -17.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLBT vs IIIV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CLBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.76
- Rev growth 18.6%, EPS growth 123.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.7%
- 43.0% 10Y total return vs IIIV's 24.9%
IIIV is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (20.3x vs 37.5x)
- -13.8% vs CLBT's -27.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.6% revenue growth vs IIIV's -7.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.3x vs 37.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.5% margin vs IIIV's 7.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs IIIV's 0.92 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -13.8% vs CLBT's -27.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.3% ROA vs IIIV's 2.6%, ROIC 18.5% vs 0.6% |
CLBT vs IIIV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CLBT vs IIIV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLBT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLBT is the larger business by revenue, generating $476M annually — 2.1x IIIV's $223M. CLBT is the more profitable business, keeping 16.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IIIV's 7.3%. On growth, CLBT holds the edge at +18.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $476M | $223M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $78M | $31M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $78M | $16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $160M | $10M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +84.2% | +60.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +0.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.5% | +7.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.7% | +4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.1% | -14.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | -78.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IIIV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 40.9x trailing earnings, IIIV trades at a 8% valuation discount to CLBT's 44.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IIIV's 14.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CLBT's 41.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.4B | $506M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.3B | $447M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 44.55x | 40.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 37.53x | 20.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.76x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 41.79x | 14.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.10x | 2.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.13x | 1.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.06x | 134.87x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLBT leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLBT delivers a 16.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $3 for IIIV. IIIV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLBT's 0.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IIIV scores 5/9 vs CLBT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.2% | +3.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.3% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.5% | +0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.8% | +0.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$102M | -$59M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $124M | $67M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23M | $8M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 5.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLBT five years ago would be worth $13,992 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,236 for IIIV. Over the past 12 months, IIIV leads with a -13.8% total return vs CLBT's -27.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLBT at 36.3% vs IIIV's -0.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.6% | -9.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.6% | -13.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +153.4% | -2.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.9% | -27.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.0% | +24.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +36.3% | -0.8% |
Risk & Volatility
CLBT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLBT is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IIIV's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.45 | $33.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.02 | $19.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.5% | +67.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.3 | 47.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 292K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CLBT as "Buy" and IIIV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.7% upside for CLBT (target: $21) vs 26.6% for IIIV (target: $29).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.67 | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.4% |
CLBT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IIIV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
CLBT vs IIIV: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLBT or IIIV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cellebrite DI Ltd.
(CLBT) is the stronger pick with 18. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 3% for i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV). i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV) offers the better valuation at 40. 9x trailing P/E (20. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CLBT or IIIV?
On trailing P/E, i3 Verticals, Inc.
(IIIV) is the cheapest at 40. 9x versus Cellebrite DI Ltd. at 44. 5x. On forward P/E, i3 Verticals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CLBT or IIIV?
Over the past 5 years, Cellebrite DI Ltd.
(CLBT) delivered a total return of +39. 9%, compared to -27. 6% for i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CLBT returned +43. 0% versus IIIV's +24. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CLBT or IIIV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cellebrite DI Ltd.
(CLBT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus i3 Verticals, Inc. 's 0. 92β — meaning IIIV is approximately 20% more volatile than CLBT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 5% for Cellebrite DI Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CLBT or IIIV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cellebrite DI Ltd.
(CLBT) is pulling ahead at 18. 6% versus -7. 3% for i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cellebrite DI Ltd. grew EPS 123. 0% year-over-year, compared to -87. 9% for i3 Verticals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLBT leads at 20. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CLBT or IIIV?
Cellebrite DI Ltd.
(CLBT) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 5% net margin versus 8. 4% for i3 Verticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLBT leads at 14. 0% versus 1. 9% for IIIV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLBT leads at 84. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CLBT or IIIV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, i3 Verticals, Inc.
(IIIV) trades at 20. 3x forward P/E versus 37. 5x for Cellebrite DI Ltd. — 17. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLBT: 49. 7% to $20. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — CLBT or IIIV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CLBT or IIIV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cellebrite DI Ltd.
(CLBT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLBT: +43. 0%, IIIV: +24. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CLBT and IIIV?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CLBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; IIIV is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.