Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CLBT vs IIIV

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CLBT
Cellebrite DI Ltd.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$3.38B
5Y Perf.+38.7%
IIIV
i3 Verticals, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$506M
5Y Perf.-17.9%

CLBT vs IIIV — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CLBT logoCLBT
IIIV logoIIIV
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - Infrastructure
Market Cap$3.38B$506M
Revenue (TTM)$476M$223M
Net Income (TTM)$78M$16M
Gross Margin84.2%60.4%
Operating Margin14.0%0.8%
Forward P/E37.5x20.3x
Total Debt$23M$8M
Cash & Equiv.$124M$67M

CLBT vs IIIVLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CLBT
IIIV
StockNov 20May 26Return
Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT)100138.7+38.7%
i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV)10082.1-17.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CLBT vs IIIV

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CLBT leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. i3 Verticals, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CLBT
Cellebrite DI Ltd.
The Income Pick

CLBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.76
  • Rev growth 18.6%, EPS growth 123.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.7%
  • 43.0% 10Y total return vs IIIV's 24.9%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
IIIV
i3 Verticals, Inc.
The Value Play

IIIV is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.

  • Lower P/E (20.3x vs 37.5x)
  • -13.8% vs CLBT's -27.6%
Best for: value and momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCLBT logoCLBT18.6% revenue growth vs IIIV's -7.3%
ValueIIIV logoIIIVLower P/E (20.3x vs 37.5x)
Quality / MarginsCLBT logoCLBT16.5% margin vs IIIV's 7.3%
Stability / SafetyCLBT logoCLBTBeta 0.76 vs IIIV's 0.92
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)IIIV logoIIIV-13.8% vs CLBT's -27.6%
Efficiency (ROA)CLBT logoCLBT8.3% ROA vs IIIV's 2.6%, ROIC 18.5% vs 0.6%

CLBT vs IIIV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CLBTCellebrite DI Ltd.
FY 2024
Subscription Services
70.6%$271M
Term-Licenses
21.4%$82M
Professional Services
8.0%$31M
IIIVi3 Verticals, Inc.
FY 2025
License and Service
93.7%$149M
Other Revenue
6.3%$10M

CLBT vs IIIV — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCLBTLAGGINGIIIV

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CLBT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

CLBT is the larger business by revenue, generating $476M annually — 2.1x IIIV's $223M. CLBT is the more profitable business, keeping 16.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IIIV's 7.3%. On growth, CLBT holds the edge at +18.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCLBT logoCLBTCellebrite DI Ltd.IIIV logoIIIVi3 Verticals, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$476M$223M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$78M$31M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$78M$16M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$160M$10M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+84.2%+60.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+14.0%+0.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+16.5%+7.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+33.7%+4.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+18.1%-14.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.7%-78.0%
CLBT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

IIIV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 40.9x trailing earnings, IIIV trades at a 8% valuation discount to CLBT's 44.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IIIV's 14.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CLBT's 41.8x.

MetricCLBT logoCLBTCellebrite DI Ltd.IIIV logoIIIVi3 Verticals, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$3.4B$506M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.3B$447M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS44.55x40.91x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.37.53x20.30x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.76x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple41.79x14.02x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue7.10x2.37x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share7.13x1.51x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF21.06x134.87x
IIIV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CLBT leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

CLBT delivers a 16.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $3 for IIIV. IIIV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLBT's 0.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IIIV scores 5/9 vs CLBT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricCLBT logoCLBTCellebrite DI Ltd.IIIV logoIIIVi3 Verticals, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+16.2%+3.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+8.3%+2.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+18.5%+0.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+13.8%+0.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–945
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.05x0.01x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$102M-$59M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$124M$67M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$23M$8M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense5.21x
CLBT leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CLBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CLBT five years ago would be worth $13,992 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,236 for IIIV. Over the past 12 months, IIIV leads with a -13.8% total return vs CLBT's -27.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLBT at 36.3% vs IIIV's -0.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCLBT logoCLBTCellebrite DI Ltd.IIIV logoIIIVi3 Verticals, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-22.6%-9.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-27.6%-13.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+153.4%-2.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+39.9%-27.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+43.0%+24.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+36.3%-0.8%
CLBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

CLBT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

CLBT is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IIIV's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricCLBT logoCLBTCellebrite DI Ltd.IIIV logoIIIVi3 Verticals, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.76x0.92x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$20.45$33.97
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$11.02$19.89
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+67.5%+67.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10049.347.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.7M292K
CLBT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates CLBT as "Buy" and IIIV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.7% upside for CLBT (target: $21) vs 26.6% for IIIV (target: $29).

MetricCLBT logoCLBTCellebrite DI Ltd.IIIV logoIIIVi3 Verticals, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$20.67$29.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts814
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+7.4%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

CLBT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IIIV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallCellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CLBT vs IIIV: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CLBT or IIIV a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Cellebrite DI Ltd.

(CLBT) is the stronger pick with 18. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 3% for i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV). i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV) offers the better valuation at 40. 9x trailing P/E (20. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CLBT or IIIV?

On trailing P/E, i3 Verticals, Inc.

(IIIV) is the cheapest at 40. 9x versus Cellebrite DI Ltd. at 44. 5x. On forward P/E, i3 Verticals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CLBT or IIIV?

Over the past 5 years, Cellebrite DI Ltd.

(CLBT) delivered a total return of +39. 9%, compared to -27. 6% for i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CLBT returned +43. 0% versus IIIV's +24. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CLBT or IIIV?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cellebrite DI Ltd.

(CLBT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus i3 Verticals, Inc. 's 0. 92β — meaning IIIV is approximately 20% more volatile than CLBT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 5% for Cellebrite DI Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CLBT or IIIV?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cellebrite DI Ltd.

(CLBT) is pulling ahead at 18. 6% versus -7. 3% for i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cellebrite DI Ltd. grew EPS 123. 0% year-over-year, compared to -87. 9% for i3 Verticals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLBT leads at 20. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CLBT or IIIV?

Cellebrite DI Ltd.

(CLBT) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 5% net margin versus 8. 4% for i3 Verticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLBT leads at 14. 0% versus 1. 9% for IIIV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLBT leads at 84. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CLBT or IIIV more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, i3 Verticals, Inc.

(IIIV) trades at 20. 3x forward P/E versus 37. 5x for Cellebrite DI Ltd. — 17. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLBT: 49. 7% to $20. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CLBT or IIIV?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is CLBT or IIIV better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Cellebrite DI Ltd.

(CLBT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLBT: +43. 0%, IIIV: +24. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CLBT and IIIV?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CLBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; IIIV is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

CLBT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IIIV

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CLBT and IIIV on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CLBT: 18.1% · IIIV: -14.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(CLBT: 16.5% · IIIV: 7.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CLBT: 44.5x · IIIV: 40.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.