Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CLBT vs NTCT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
CLBT vs NTCT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $3.38B | $2.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $476M | $861M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $78M | $96M |
| Gross Margin | 84.2% | 79.2% |
| Operating Margin | 14.0% | 12.8% |
| Forward P/E | 37.5x | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $23M | $76M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $124M | $457M |
CLBT vs NTCT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) | 100 | 138.7 | +38.7% |
| NetScout Systems, I… (NTCT) | 100 | 163.5 | +63.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLBT vs NTCT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CLBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.76
- Rev growth 18.6%, EPS growth 123.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 4.7%, current ratio 1.56x
NTCT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 66.6% 10Y total return vs CLBT's 43.0%
- Lower P/E (15.9x vs 37.5x)
- +80.5% vs CLBT's -27.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.6% revenue growth vs NTCT's -0.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.9x vs 37.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.5% margin vs NTCT's 11.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs NTCT's 1.12, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.5% vs CLBT's -27.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.3% ROA vs NTCT's 4.3%, ROIC 18.5% vs -19.3% |
CLBT vs NTCT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CLBT vs NTCT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLBT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTCT is the larger business by revenue, generating $861M annually — 1.8x CLBT's $476M. CLBT is the more profitable business, keeping 16.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTCT's 11.1%. On growth, CLBT holds the edge at +18.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $476M | $861M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $78M | $171M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $78M | $96M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $160M | $275M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +84.2% | +79.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +12.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.5% | +11.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.7% | +32.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.1% | -0.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | +11.9% |
Valuation Metrics
NTCT leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.4B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.3B | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 44.55x | -7.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 37.53x | 15.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.76x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 41.79x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.10x | 3.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.13x | 1.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.06x | 13.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLBT leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLBT delivers a 16.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $6 for NTCT. CLBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NTCT's 0.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTCT scores 6/9 vs CLBT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.2% | +6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.3% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.5% | -19.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.8% | -18.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$102M | -$381M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $124M | $457M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23M | $76M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 55.89x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTCT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTCT five years ago would be worth $14,293 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,992 for CLBT. Over the past 12 months, NTCT leads with a +80.5% total return vs CLBT's -27.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLBT at 36.3% vs NTCT's 9.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.6% | +42.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.6% | +80.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +153.4% | +30.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.9% | +42.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.0% | +66.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +36.3% | +9.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CLBT and NTCT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLBT is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NTCT's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTCT currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs CLBT's 67.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.45 | $39.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.02 | $19.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.5% | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.3 | 68.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 552K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CLBT as "Buy" and NTCT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 49.7% upside for CLBT (target: $21) vs -24.3% for NTCT (target: $29).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.67 | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% |
CLBT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NTCT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
CLBT vs NTCT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLBT or NTCT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cellebrite DI Ltd.
(CLBT) is the stronger pick with 18. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 8% for NetScout Systems, Inc. (NTCT). Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) offers the better valuation at 44. 5x trailing P/E (37. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CLBT or NTCT?
On forward P/E, NetScout Systems, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 15. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CLBT or NTCT?
Over the past 5 years, NetScout Systems, Inc.
(NTCT) delivered a total return of +42. 9%, compared to +39. 9% for Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTCT returned +66. 6% versus CLBT's +43. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CLBT or NTCT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cellebrite DI Ltd.
(CLBT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus NetScout Systems, Inc. 's 1. 12β — meaning NTCT is approximately 47% more volatile than CLBT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 5% for NetScout Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CLBT or NTCT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cellebrite DI Ltd.
(CLBT) is pulling ahead at 18. 6% versus -0. 8% for NetScout Systems, Inc. (NTCT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cellebrite DI Ltd. grew EPS 123. 0% year-over-year, compared to -144. 4% for NetScout Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLBT leads at 20. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CLBT or NTCT?
Cellebrite DI Ltd.
(CLBT) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 5% net margin versus -44. 6% for NetScout Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLBT leads at 14. 0% versus -44. 7% for NTCT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLBT leads at 84. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CLBT or NTCT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NetScout Systems, Inc.
(NTCT) trades at 15. 9x forward P/E versus 37. 5x for Cellebrite DI Ltd. — 21. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLBT: 49. 7% to $20. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — CLBT or NTCT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CLBT or NTCT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cellebrite DI Ltd.
(CLBT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLBT: +43. 0%, NTCT: +66. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CLBT and NTCT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CLBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; NTCT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.