REIT - Residential
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CLPR vs VRE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
CLPR vs VRE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $52M | $1.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $153M | $291M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-20M | $70M |
| Gross Margin | 80.2% | 23.4% |
| Operating Margin | 2.7% | 14.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 23.7x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $1.37B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $31M | $14M |
CLPR vs VRE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR) | 100 | 43.4 | -56.6% |
| Veris Residential, … (VRE) | 100 | 124.5 | +24.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLPR vs VRE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CLPR is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Better valuation composite
- 13.6% yield, vs VRE's 1.7%
VRE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.22, yield 1.7%
- Rev growth 6.4%, EPS growth 420.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.3%
- -11.9% 10Y total return vs CLPR's -50.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.4% FFO/revenue growth vs CLPR's 3.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.2% margin vs CLPR's -13.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs CLPR's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | 13.6% yield, vs VRE's 1.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.1% vs CLPR's -5.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.5% ROA vs CLPR's -1.6%, ROIC 1.3% vs 0.6% |
CLPR vs VRE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CLPR vs VRE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VRE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VRE is the larger business by revenue, generating $291M annually — 1.9x CLPR's $153M. VRE is the more profitable business, keeping 24.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLPR's -13.0%. On growth, VRE holds the edge at +3.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $153M | $291M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $36M | $129M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$20M | $70M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | $50M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.2% | +23.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | +14.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.0% | +24.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | +17.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.3% | -36.4% |
Valuation Metrics
CLPR leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CLPR's 0.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VRE's 23.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $52M | $1.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $21M | $3.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.81x | 23.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.59x | 23.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.34x | 6.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.29x | 32.34x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VRE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VRE scores 7/9 vs CLPR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +5.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.6% | +2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.6% | +1.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.3% | +2.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$31M | $1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $31M | $14M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VRE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VRE five years ago would be worth $11,971 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,050 for CLPR. Over the past 12 months, VRE leads with a +21.1% total return vs CLPR's -5.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VRE at 6.4% vs CLPR's -8.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.4% | +28.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -5.5% | +21.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.1% | +20.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.5% | +19.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.3% | -11.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.0% | +6.4% |
Risk & Volatility
VRE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VRE is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLPR's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VRE currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs CLPR's 69.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 0.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.61 | $19.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.83 | $13.69 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.4% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.0 | 67.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 69K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CLPR and VRE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, CLPR offers the higher dividend yield at 13.58% vs VRE's 1.70%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +13.6% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.43 | $0.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% |
VRE leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CLPR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CLPR vs VRE: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLPR or VRE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Veris Residential, Inc.
(VRE) is the stronger pick with 6. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR). Veris Residential, Inc. (VRE) offers the better valuation at 23. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Veris Residential, Inc. (VRE) a "Hold" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CLPR or VRE?
Over the past 5 years, Veris Residential, Inc.
(VRE) delivered a total return of +19. 7%, compared to -39. 5% for Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VRE returned -11. 9% versus CLPR's -50. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CLPR or VRE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Veris Residential, Inc.
(VRE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus Clipper Realty Inc. 's 0. 95β — meaning CLPR is approximately 329% more volatile than VRE relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — CLPR or VRE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Veris Residential, Inc.
(VRE) is pulling ahead at 6. 4% versus 3. 0% for Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Veris Residential, Inc. grew EPS 420. 0% year-over-year, compared to -88. 0% for Clipper Realty Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VRE leads at 7. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CLPR or VRE?
Veris Residential, Inc.
(VRE) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 1% net margin versus -13. 0% for Clipper Realty Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VRE leads at 17. 1% versus 2. 7% for CLPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLPR leads at 80. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CLPR or VRE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR) offers the highest yield at 13. 6%, versus 1. 7% for Veris Residential, Inc. (VRE).
07Is CLPR or VRE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Veris Residential, Inc.
(VRE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 22), 1. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VRE: -11. 9%, CLPR: -50. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CLPR and VRE?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CLPR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; VRE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.