CLPT vs ANGO

For growth investors, ClearPoint Neuro, Inc.

(CLPT) is the stronger pick with 17. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 8% for AngioDynamics, Inc. (ANGO). Analysts rate ClearPoint Neuro, Inc. (CLPT) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, ClearPoint Neuro, Inc.

(CLPT) delivered a total return of -38. 3%, compared to -53. 3% for AngioDynamics, Inc. (ANGO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ANGO returned -9. 2% versus CLPT's -25. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AngioDynamics, Inc.

(ANGO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 32β versus ClearPoint Neuro, Inc. 's 2. 34β — meaning CLPT is approximately 77% more volatile than ANGO relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ClearPoint Neuro, Inc.

(CLPT) is pulling ahead at 17. 8% versus -3. 8% for AngioDynamics, Inc. (ANGO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AngioDynamics, Inc. grew EPS 81. 9% year-over-year, compared to -28. 6% for ClearPoint Neuro, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLPT leads at 21. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

AngioDynamics, Inc.

(ANGO) is the more profitable company, earning -11. 6% net margin versus -69. 1% for ClearPoint Neuro, Inc. — meaning it keeps -11. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ANGO leads at -13. 7% versus -65. 4% for CLPT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLPT leads at 61. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, AngioDynamics, Inc.

(ANGO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. ClearPoint Neuro, Inc. (CLPT) carries a higher beta of 2. 34 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ANGO: -9. 2%, CLPT: -25. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CLPT is a small-cap high-growth stock; ANGO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.