Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSKW) vs Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CLSKW | 102.2% revenue growth vs RIOT's 34.2% |
| Value | CLSKW | Lower P/E (0.3x vs 47.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | CLSKW | 47.6% net margin vs RIOT's 29.0% |
| Stability / Safety | CLSKW | Beta 2.34 vs RIOT's 2.35 |
| Dividends | CLSKW | 10.8% yield; 3-year raise streak; RIOT pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | RIOT | +75.5% vs CLSKW's -34.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | RIOT | 3.7% ROA vs CLSKW's -7.8%, ROIC 4.1% vs 9.9% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
CleanSpark is a Bitcoin mining company that operates data centers primarily powered by low-carbon energy sources. It generates revenue almost entirely from Bitcoin mining rewards and transaction fees — earning newly minted Bitcoin through its computing power contribution to the network. The company's key advantage is its focus on sustainable energy sources and strategic location in low-cost power regions, which gives it a cost edge in the energy-intensive mining process.
Riot Platforms is a Bitcoin mining company that operates large-scale mining facilities in Texas and Kentucky. It generates revenue primarily from Bitcoin mining rewards (the majority of income) and secondarily from engineering services — designing and manufacturing power distribution equipment for data centers and industrial clients. The company's competitive advantage lies in its vertically integrated operations — owning its mining facilities and power infrastructure — which provides cost control and operational efficiency in the energy-intensive mining business.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
CLSKW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics). RIOT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
CLSKW is the larger business by revenue, generating $766M annually — 2.0x RIOT's $377M. CLSKW is the more profitable business, keeping 47.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RIOT's 29.0%.
| Metric | CLSKWCleanSpark, Inc. | RIOTRiot Platforms, I… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $766M | $377M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $117M | $577M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$261M | $164M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$627M | -$1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.2% | +30.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +41.6% | +40.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +47.6% | +29.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -79.0% | -4.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +148.1% |
Valuation Metrics
At 0.3x trailing earnings, CLSKW trades at a 99% valuation discount to RIOT's 47.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CLSKW's 1.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RIOT's 17.5x.
| Metric | CLSKWCleanSpark, Inc. | RIOTRiot Platforms, I… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $89M | $6.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $870M | $6.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.28x | 47.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.30x | 17.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.12x | 16.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.05x | 1.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RIOT delivers a 4.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-19 for CLSKW. RIOT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLSKW's 0.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLSKW scores 4/9 vs RIOT's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | CLSKWCleanSpark, Inc. | RIOTRiot Platforms, I… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -18.9% | +4.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.8% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.9% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.7% | +5.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.38x | 0.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $781M | $335M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $43M | $278M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $824M | $613M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 25.88x | 20.48x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in CLSKW five years ago would be worth $56,818 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,039 for RIOT. Over the past 12 months, RIOT leads with a +75.5% total return vs CLSKW's -34.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLSKW at 78.4% vs RIOT's 37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CLSKWCleanSpark, Inc. | RIOTRiot Platforms, I… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.8% | +15.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -34.4% | +75.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +468.2% | +160.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +468.2% | -69.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +468.2% | +540.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +78.4% | +37.6% |
Risk & Volatility
CLSKW is the less volatile stock with a 2.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RIOT's 2.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RIOT currently trades 68.0% from its 52-week high vs CLSKW's 30.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CLSKWCleanSpark, Inc. | RIOTRiot Platforms, I… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.34x | 2.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.02 | $23.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.15 | $6.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.6% | +68.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.7 | 58.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 154K | 16.2M |
Analyst Outlook
CLSKW is the only dividend payer here at 10.82% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | CLSKWCleanSpark, Inc. | RIOTRiot Platforms, I… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $28.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +10.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.03 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +100.0% | +0.2% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Nov 24 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSKW) | 100 | 439.82 | +339.8% |
| Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) | 100 | 171.24 | +71.2% |
CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSKW) returned +468% over 5 years vs Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT)'s -70%. A $10,000 investment in CLSKW 5 years ago would be worth $56,818 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSKW) | $82031.00 | $766M | +934076.1% |
| Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) | $106115.00 | $377M | +354852.6% |
CleanSpark, Inc.'s revenue grew from $0M (2016) to $766M (2025) — a 176.2% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSKW) | -31.0% | 47.6% | +253.6% |
| Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) | -40.3% | 29.0% | +172.1% |
CleanSpark, Inc.'s net margin went from -31% (2016) to 48% (2025).
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSKW) | -1.13 | 1.12 | +199.1% |
| Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) | -1.05 | 0.34 | +132.4% |
CleanSpark, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-1.13 (2016) to $1.12 (2025).
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
CleanSpark, Inc. generated $-606M FCF in 2025 (-140% vs 2021). Riot Platforms, Inc. generated $-2B FCF in 2024 (-200% vs 2021).
CLSKW vs RIOT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLSKW or RIOT a better buy right now?
CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSKW) offers the better valuation at 0.3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CLSKW or RIOT?
On trailing P/E, CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSKW) is the cheapest at 0.3x versus Riot Platforms, Inc. at 47.9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CLSKW or RIOT?
Over the past 5 years, CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSKW) delivered a total return of +468.2%, compared to -69.6% for Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT). A $10,000 investment in CLSKW five years ago would be worth approximately $57K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RIOT returned +540.4% versus CLSKW's +468.2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CLSKW or RIOT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSKW) is the lower-risk stock at 2.34β versus Riot Platforms, Inc.'s 2.35β — meaning RIOT is approximately 1% more volatile than CLSKW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 38% for CleanSpark, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — CLSKW or RIOT?
CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSKW) is the more profitable company, earning 47.6% net margin versus 29.0% for Riot Platforms, Inc. — meaning it keeps 47.6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLSKW leads at 41.6% versus 40.8% for RIOT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLSKW leads at 55.2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CLSKW or RIOT?
In this comparison, CLSKW (10.8% yield) pays a dividend. RIOT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is CLSKW or RIOT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSKW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (10.8% yield, +468.2% 10Y return). Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) carries a higher beta of 2.35 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLSKW: +468.2%, RIOT: +540.4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CLSKW and RIOT?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: CLSKW is a small-cap deep-value stock; RIOT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CLSKW pays a dividend while RIOT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.