Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CLWT vs CODA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
CLWT vs CODA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $9M | $134M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $33M | $28M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $4M |
| Gross Margin | 25.0% | 66.3% |
| Operating Margin | 0.4% | 17.4% |
| Forward P/E | 12.8x | 22.5x |
| Total Debt | $92K | $395K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $29M |
CLWT vs CODA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Euro Tech Holdings … (CLWT) | 100 | 120.8 | +20.8% |
| Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA) | 100 | 212.9 | +112.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLWT vs CODA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CLWT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.37, yield 6.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.37, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 2.30x
- Beta 0.37, yield 6.6%, current ratio 2.30x
CODA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 30.7%, EPS growth 15.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
- 8.1% 10Y total return vs CLWT's 153.9%
- 30.7% revenue growth vs CLWT's -14.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.7% revenue growth vs CLWT's -14.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.8x vs 22.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.8% margin vs CLWT's 7.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.37 vs CODA's 1.00, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.6% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +75.6% vs CLWT's +5.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.8% ROA vs CODA's 6.6%, ROIC 2.6% vs 11.2% |
CLWT vs CODA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CLWT vs CODA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLWT and CODA operate at a comparable scale, with $33M and $28M in trailing revenue. CODA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLWT's 7.7%. On growth, CODA holds the edge at +28.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $33M | $28M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $292,750 | $6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | $4M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $691,000 | $7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.0% | +66.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | +17.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +14.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | +24.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.6% | +28.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -66.9% | +3.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CLWT leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.8x trailing earnings, CLWT trades at a 60% valuation discount to CODA's 32.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CLWT's 6.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CODA's 17.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9M | $134M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | $106M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.84x | 32.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 7.52x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.73x | 17.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.60x | 5.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.56x | 2.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.97x | 22.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLWT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLWT delivers a 16.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $7 for CODA. CLWT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CODA's 0.01x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.2% | +7.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.8% | +6.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | +11.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.3% | +8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6M | -$28M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $29M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $92,000 | $394,932 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 74.42x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CODA five years ago would be worth $15,481 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,903 for CLWT. Over the past 12 months, CODA leads with a +75.6% total return vs CLWT's +5.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CODA at 10.4% vs CLWT's -4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.7% | +25.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.2% | +75.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.6% | +34.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.0% | +54.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +153.9% | +805.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.0% | +10.4% |
Risk & Volatility
CLWT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLWT is the less volatile stock with a 0.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CODA's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLWT currently trades 74.8% from its 52-week high vs CODA's 69.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.37x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.63 | $17.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.99 | $5.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.8% | +69.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.9 | 45.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5K | 259K |
Analyst Outlook
CLWT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
CLWT is the only dividend payer here at 6.55% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.08 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% |
CLWT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CODA leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns).
CLWT vs CODA: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLWT or CODA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the stronger pick with 30. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 3% for Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT). Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CLWT or CODA?
On trailing P/E, Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT) is the cheapest at 12.
8x versus Coda Octopus Group, Inc. at 32. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CLWT or CODA?
Over the past 5 years, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) delivered a total return of +54. 8%, compared to -31. 0% for Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +805. 8% versus CLWT's +153. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CLWT or CODA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
37β versus Coda Octopus Group, Inc. 's 1. 00β — meaning CODA is approximately 168% more volatile than CLWT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 1% for Coda Octopus Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CLWT or CODA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is pulling ahead at 30. 7% versus -14. 3% for Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Coda Octopus Group, Inc. grew EPS 15. 6% year-over-year, compared to -60. 4% for Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, CODA leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CLWT or CODA?
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus 4. 8% for Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CODA leads at 17. 1% versus 2. 5% for CLWT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODA leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — CLWT or CODA?
In this comparison, CLWT (6.
6% yield) pays a dividend. CODA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is CLWT or CODA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
37), 6. 6% yield, +153. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLWT: +153. 9%, CODA: +805. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CLWT and CODA?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CLWT is a small-cap deep-value stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock. CLWT pays a dividend while CODA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.