Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CLWT vs CODA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited

Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls

IndustrialsNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$9M
5Y Perf.+20.8%
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$134M
5Y Perf.+112.9%

CLWT vs CODA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CLWT logoCLWT
CODA logoCODA
IndustryIndustrial - Pollution & Treatment ControlsAerospace & Defense
Market Cap$9M$134M
Revenue (TTM)$33M$28M
Net Income (TTM)$3M$4M
Gross Margin25.0%66.3%
Operating Margin0.4%17.4%
Forward P/E12.8x22.5x
Total Debt$92K$395K
Cash & Equiv.$6M$29M

CLWT vs CODALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CLWT
CODA
StockMay 20May 26Return
Euro Tech Holdings … (CLWT)100120.8+20.8%
Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA)100212.9+112.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CLWT vs CODA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CLWT leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Coda Octopus Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited
The Income Pick

CLWT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.37, yield 6.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.37, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 2.30x
  • Beta 0.37, yield 6.6%, current ratio 2.30x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
The Growth Play

CODA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 30.7%, EPS growth 15.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
  • 8.1% 10Y total return vs CLWT's 153.9%
  • 30.7% revenue growth vs CLWT's -14.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCODA logoCODA30.7% revenue growth vs CLWT's -14.3%
ValueCLWT logoCLWTLower P/E (12.8x vs 22.5x)
Quality / MarginsCODA logoCODA14.8% margin vs CLWT's 7.7%
Stability / SafetyCLWT logoCLWTBeta 0.37 vs CODA's 1.00, lower leverage
DividendsCLWT logoCLWT6.6% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CODA logoCODA+75.6% vs CLWT's +5.2%
Efficiency (ROA)CLWT logoCLWT12.8% ROA vs CODA's 6.6%, ROIC 2.6% vs 11.2%

CLWT vs CODA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Company Limited
FY 2016
The PRC
98.3%$11M
Others
1.7%$187,000
CODACoda Octopus Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Equipment Sales
71.3%$14M
Service
17.3%$4M
Equipment Rentals
7.3%$1M
Software Sales
4.0%$811,912

CLWT vs CODA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCLWTLAGGINGCODA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

CLWT and CODA operate at a comparable scale, with $33M and $28M in trailing revenue. CODA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLWT's 7.7%. On growth, CODA holds the edge at +28.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCLWT logoCLWTEuro Tech Holding…CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$33M$28M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$292,750$6M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$3M$4M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$691,000$7M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+25.0%+66.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+0.4%+17.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+7.7%+14.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+2.1%+24.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-18.6%+28.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-66.9%+3.0%
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CLWT leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 12.8x trailing earnings, CLWT trades at a 60% valuation discount to CODA's 32.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CLWT's 6.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CODA's 17.9x.

MetricCLWT logoCLWTEuro Tech Holding…CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…
Market CapShares × price$9M$134M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4M$106M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.84x32.22x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.49x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate7.52x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.73x17.89x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.60x5.06x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.56x2.31x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.97x22.24x
CLWT leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CLWT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

CLWT delivers a 16.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $7 for CODA. CLWT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CODA's 0.01x.

MetricCLWT logoCLWTEuro Tech Holding…CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+16.2%+7.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+12.8%+6.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.6%+11.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.3%+8.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–977
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.01x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$6M-$28M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$6M$29M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$92,000$394,932
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense74.42x
CLWT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CODA five years ago would be worth $15,481 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,903 for CLWT. Over the past 12 months, CODA leads with a +75.6% total return vs CLWT's +5.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CODA at 10.4% vs CLWT's -4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCLWT logoCLWTEuro Tech Holding…CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+1.7%+25.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+5.2%+75.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-11.6%+34.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-31.0%+54.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+153.9%+805.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-4.0%+10.4%
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

CLWT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

CLWT is the less volatile stock with a 0.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CODA's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLWT currently trades 74.8% from its 52-week high vs CODA's 69.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCLWT logoCLWTEuro Tech Holding…CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.37x1.00x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1.63$17.28
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.99$5.98
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+74.8%+69.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10035.945.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded5K259K
CLWT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CLWT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

CLWT is the only dividend payer here at 6.55% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricCLWT logoCLWTEuro Tech Holding…CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$14.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+6.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.08
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%0.0%
CLWT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CLWT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CODA leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns).

Best OverallEuro Tech Holdings Company … (CLWT)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CLWT vs CODA: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CLWT or CODA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) is the stronger pick with 30. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 3% for Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT). Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CLWT or CODA?

On trailing P/E, Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT) is the cheapest at 12.

8x versus Coda Octopus Group, Inc. at 32. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CLWT or CODA?

Over the past 5 years, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) delivered a total return of +54. 8%, compared to -31. 0% for Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +805. 8% versus CLWT's +153. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CLWT or CODA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

37β versus Coda Octopus Group, Inc. 's 1. 00β — meaning CODA is approximately 168% more volatile than CLWT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 1% for Coda Octopus Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CLWT or CODA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) is pulling ahead at 30. 7% versus -14. 3% for Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Coda Octopus Group, Inc. grew EPS 15. 6% year-over-year, compared to -60. 4% for Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, CODA leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CLWT or CODA?

Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus 4. 8% for Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CODA leads at 17. 1% versus 2. 5% for CLWT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODA leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — CLWT or CODA?

In this comparison, CLWT (6.

6% yield) pays a dividend. CODA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is CLWT or CODA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

37), 6. 6% yield, +153. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLWT: +153. 9%, CODA: +805. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between CLWT and CODA?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CLWT is a small-cap deep-value stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock. CLWT pays a dividend while CODA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

CLWT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CODA

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CLWT and CODA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CLWT: -18.6% · CODA: 28.8%)
Net Margin>
%
(CLWT: 7.7% · CODA: 14.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CLWT: 12.8x · CODA: 32.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.