CMBT
Cmb.Tech N.V.
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$3.56B
5Y Perf.+90.2%
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisCMBT
INSW
Try popular comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CMBT vs INSW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$4.06B
5Y Perf.+401.9%
CMBT vs INSW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot |  CMBT |  INSW |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $3.56B | $4.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.67B | $985M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $161M | $546M |
| Gross Margin | 35.5% | 55.1% |
| Operating Margin | 27.4% | 50.4% |
| Forward P/E | 7.7x | 5.7x |
| Total Debt | $5.57B | $576M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $147M | $117M |
CMBT vs INSW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CMBT
INSW
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cmb.Tech N.V. (CMBT) | 100 | 190.2 | +90.2% |
| International Seawa… (INSW) | 100 | 501.9 | +401.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CMBT vs INSW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: INSW leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Cmb.Tech N.V. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇INSW emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
CMBT
Cmb.Tech N.V.
The Growth Play
CMBT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 77.2%, EPS growth -83.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.2%
- 77.2% revenue growth vs INSW's -11.4%
Best for: growth exposure
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
The Income Pick
INSW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.31, yield 3.6%
- 9.8% 10Y total return vs CMBT's 191.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.31, Low D/E 28.5%, current ratio 3.71x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth |  CMBT | 77.2% revenue growth vs INSW's -11.4% |
| Value |  INSW | Lower P/E (5.7x vs 7.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | INSW | 55.4% margin vs CMBT's 9.6% |
| Stability / Safety | INSW | Beta 0.31 vs CMBT's 0.42, lower leverage |
| Dividends | INSW | 3.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs CMBT's 0.6% |
| Momentum (1Y) | INSW | +138.1% vs CMBT's +73.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | INSW | 20.1% ROA vs CMBT's 1.9%, ROIC 9.4% vs 4.7% |
CMBT vs INSW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
CMBT vs INSW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLINSWLAGGINGCMBT
CMBTCmb.Tech N.V.
0leads
INSWInternational Seaways…
6leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CMBTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
INSW5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
INSW3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
INSW9/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
INSW6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
INSW2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
INSW2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMBT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.7B annually — 1.7x INSW's $985M. INSW is the more profitable business, keeping 55.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMBT's 9.6%. On growth, CMBT holds the edge at +160.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CMBTCmb.Tech N.V. | INSWInternational Sea… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $985M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $856M | $661M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $161M | $546M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$612M | $122M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.5% | +55.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.4% | +50.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.6% | +55.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -36.7% | +12.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +160.6% | +77.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.4% | +4.8% |
INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
INSW leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.2x trailing earnings, INSW trades at a 38% valuation discount to CMBT's 21.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, INSW's 9.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CMBT's 11.8x.
| Metric | CMBTCmb.Tech N.V. | INSWInternational Sea… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.6B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.0B | $4.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.23x | 13.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.67x | 5.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.84x | 9.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.13x | 4.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.36x | 2.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 106.47x |
INSW leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INSW leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INSW delivers a 27.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $6 for CMBT. INSW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMBT's 2.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INSW scores 6/9 vs CMBT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | CMBTCmb.Tech N.V. | INSWInternational Sea… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.2% | +27.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | +20.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.7% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.8% | +12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.12x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.4B | $459M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $147M | $117M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.6B | $576M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.09x | 1.41x |
INSW leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INSW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INSW five years ago would be worth $53,474 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $26,907 for CMBT. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +138.1% total return vs CMBT's +73.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INSW at 41.0% vs CMBT's 14.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CMBTCmb.Tech N.V. | INSWInternational Sea… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +74.4% | +88.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +73.1% | +138.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.2% | +180.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +169.1% | +434.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +191.6% | +978.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.0% | +41.0% |
INSW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INSW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INSW is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMBT's 0.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | CMBTCmb.Tech N.V. | INSWInternational Sea… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.42x | 0.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.72 | $92.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.78 | $36.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.5% | +88.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.7 | 53.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 497K |
INSW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
INSW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CMBT as "Hold" and INSW as "Buy". For income investors, INSW offers the higher dividend yield at 3.56% vs CMBT's 0.59%.
| Metric | CMBTCmb.Tech N.V. | INSWInternational Sea… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $86.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.6% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.09 | $2.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
INSW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
INSW leads in 6 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
Best OverallInternational Seaways, Inc. (INSW)Leads 6 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CMBT vs INSW: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMBT or INSW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cmb.
Tech N. V. (CMBT) is the stronger pick with 77. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 4% for International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) offers the better valuation at 13. 2x trailing P/E (5. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CMBT or INSW?
On trailing P/E, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the cheapest at 13. 2x versus Cmb. Tech N. V. at 21. 2x. On forward P/E, International Seaways, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CMBT or INSW?
Over the past 5 years, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) delivered a total return of +434. 7%, compared to +169. 1% for Cmb. Tech N. V. (CMBT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +978. 0% versus CMBT's +191. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CMBT or INSW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 31β versus Cmb. Tech N. V. 's 0. 42β — meaning CMBT is approximately 38% more volatile than INSW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 2% for Cmb. Tech N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CMBT or INSW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cmb.
Tech N. V. (CMBT) is pulling ahead at 77. 2% versus -11. 4% for International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: International Seaways, Inc. grew EPS -25. 7% year-over-year, compared to -83. 6% for Cmb. Tech N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CMBT leads at 24. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CMBT or INSW?
International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 7% net margin versus 9. 6% for Cmb. Tech N. V. — meaning it keeps 36. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INSW leads at 36. 3% versus 22. 2% for CMBT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INSW leads at 42. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CMBT or INSW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) trades at 5. 7x forward P/E versus 7. 7x for Cmb. Tech N. V. — 2. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — CMBT or INSW?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 0. 6% for Cmb. Tech N. V. (CMBT).
09Is CMBT or INSW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 31), 3. 6% yield, +978. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +978. 0%, CMBT: +191. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CMBT and INSW?
These companies operate in different sectors (CMBT (Industrials) and INSW (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CMBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; INSW is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.