Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
CMBT logo
CMBT
INSW logo
INSW
STNG logo
STNG
TNK logo
TNK
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CMBT vs INSW vs STNG vs TNK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CMBT
Cmb.Tech N.V.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • BE
Market Cap$3.56B
5Y Perf.+90.2%
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.06B
5Y Perf.+401.9%
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • MC
Market Cap$4.09B
5Y Perf.+517.1%
TNK
Teekay Tankers Ltd.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$2.61B
5Y Perf.+488.1%

CMBT vs INSW vs STNG vs TNK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CMBT logoCMBT
INSW logoINSW
STNG logoSTNG
TNK logoTNK
IndustryMarine ShippingOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas MidstreamMarine Shipping
Market Cap$3.56B$4.06B$4.09B$2.61B
Revenue (TTM)$1.67B$985M$1.04B$1.01B
Net Income (TTM)$161M$546M$502M$429M
Gross Margin35.5%55.1%51.8%34.9%
Operating Margin27.4%50.4%38.8%31.0%
Forward P/E7.7x5.7x6.2x5.1x
Total Debt$5.57B$576M$619M$55M
Cash & Equiv.$147M$117M$752M$831M

CMBT vs INSW vs STNG vs TNKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CMBT
INSW
STNG
TNK
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Cmb.Tech N.V. (CMBT)100190.2+90.2%
International Seawa… (INSW)100501.9+401.9%
Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG)100617.1+517.1%
Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK)100588.1+488.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CMBT vs INSW vs STNG vs TNK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: INSW leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Cmb.Tech N.V. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. STNG and TNK also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇INSW emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
CMBT
Cmb.Tech N.V.
The Growth Play

CMBT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 77.2%, EPS growth -83.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.2%
  • 77.2% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
Best for: growth exposure
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
The Income Pick

INSW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.31, yield 3.6%
  • 9.8% 10Y total return vs TNK's 214.6%
  • 55.4% margin vs CMBT's 9.6%
  • 3.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs STNG's 2.1%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
The Defensive Pick

STNG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 19.4%, current ratio 9.33x
  • Beta 0.12, yield 2.1%, current ratio 9.33x
  • Beta 0.12 vs CMBT's 0.42, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
TNK
Teekay Tankers Ltd.
The Value Pick

TNK is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.16 vs STNG's 0.19
  • Lower P/E (5.1x vs 5.7x)
Best for: valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCMBT logoCMBT77.2% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
ValueTNK logoTNKLower P/E (5.1x vs 5.7x)
Quality / MarginsINSW logoINSW55.4% margin vs CMBT's 9.6%
Stability / SafetySTNG logoSTNGBeta 0.12 vs CMBT's 0.42, lower leverage
DividendsINSW logoINSW3.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs STNG's 2.1%
Momentum (1Y)INSW logoINSW+138.1% vs TNK's +68.8%
Efficiency (ROA)INSW logoINSW20.1% ROA vs CMBT's 1.9%, ROIC 9.4% vs 4.7%

CMBT vs INSW vs STNG vs TNK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CMBTCmb.Tech N.V.
FY 2025
Spot Voyages
84.7%$822M
Pool Revenue
15.3%$148M
INSWInternational Seaways, Inc.
FY 2025
Pool Revenue Leases
76.1%$642M
Time and Bareboat Charter Leases
18.7%$158M
Voyage Charter Leases
5.2%$44M
STNGScorpio Tankers Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

TNKTeekay Tankers Ltd.
FY 2025
Voyage charters
56.3%$785M
Voyage Charters - Suezmax
30.5%$425M
Other revenue
10.3%$143M
Time-charter
1.7%$23M
Ship-to-ship support services, Other revenue
1.1%$15M
Time Charters - Suezmax
0.3%$4M

CMBT vs INSW vs STNG vs TNK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLINSWLAGGINGCMBT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

INSW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

CMBT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.7B annually — 1.7x INSW's $985M. INSW is the more profitable business, keeping 55.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMBT's 9.6%. On growth, CMBT holds the edge at +160.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.7B$985M$1.0B$1.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$856M$661M$580M$398M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$161M$546M$502M$429M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$612M$122M$389M$138M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+35.5%+55.1%+51.8%+34.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+27.4%+50.4%+38.8%+31.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+9.6%+55.4%+48.4%+42.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-36.7%+12.3%+37.5%+13.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+160.6%+77.5%+46.2%+23.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-35.4%+4.8%+2.5%+100.9%
INSW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TNK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 7.5x trailing earnings, TNK trades at a 65% valuation discount to CMBT's 21.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TNK offers better value at 0.24x vs STNG's 0.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…
Market CapShares × price$3.6B$4.1B$4.1B$2.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$9.0B$4.5B$4.0B$1.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS21.23x13.16x11.24x7.47x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.67x5.69x6.25x5.12x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.34x0.24x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.84x9.62x8.08x6.09x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.13x4.81x4.36x2.74x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.36x2.01x1.21x1.28x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF106.47x8.33x23.19x
TNK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TNK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

INSW delivers a 27.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $6 for CMBT. TNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMBT's 2.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INSW scores 6/9 vs TNK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.2%+27.1%+15.9%+21.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.9%+20.1%+12.6%+19.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.7%+9.4%+7.2%+12.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.8%+12.1%+8.4%+10.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94664
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.12x0.29x0.19x0.03x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$5.4B$459M-$133M-$776M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$147M$117M$752M$831M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5.6B$576M$619M$55M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.09x1.41x6.82x140.54x
TNK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TNK five years ago would be worth $55,324 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $26,907 for CMBT. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +138.1% total return vs TNK's +68.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INSW at 41.0% vs CMBT's 14.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+74.4%+88.8%+60.9%+49.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+73.1%+138.1%+93.0%+68.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+48.2%+180.6%+90.5%+125.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+169.1%+434.7%+293.4%+453.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+191.6%+978.0%+80.8%+214.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+14.0%+41.0%+24.0%+31.2%
INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

STNG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

STNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMBT's 0.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.42x0.31x0.12x0.31x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.72$92.66$87.39$83.99
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.78$36.03$38.83$41.05
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+87.5%+88.5%+90.5%+89.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10049.753.643.545.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.6M497K901K398K
STNG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — INSW and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CMBT as "Hold", INSW as "Buy", STNG as "Buy", TNK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.1% upside for TNK (target: $86) vs 5.7% for INSW (target: $87). For income investors, INSW offers the higher dividend yield at 3.56% vs CMBT's 0.59%.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$86.67$87.00$86.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts3133123
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.6%+3.6%+2.1%+2.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0130
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.09$2.92$1.69$1.98
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — INSW and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

INSW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). TNK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallInternational Seaways, Inc. (INSW)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CMBT vs INSW vs STNG vs TNK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CMBT or INSW or STNG or TNK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Cmb.

Tech N. V. (CMBT) is the stronger pick with 77. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E (5. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CMBT or INSW or STNG or TNK?

On trailing P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd.

(TNK) is the cheapest at 7. 5x versus Cmb. Tech N. V. at 21. 2x. On forward P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd. is actually cheaper at 5. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Teekay Tankers Ltd. wins at 0. 16x versus Scorpio Tankers Inc. 's 0. 19x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CMBT or INSW or STNG or TNK?

Over the past 5 years, Teekay Tankers Ltd.

(TNK) delivered a total return of +453. 2%, compared to +169. 1% for Cmb. Tech N. V. (CMBT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +978. 0% versus STNG's +80. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CMBT or INSW or STNG or TNK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Scorpio Tankers Inc.

(STNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Cmb. Tech N. V. 's 0. 42β — meaning CMBT is approximately 262% more volatile than STNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 2% for Cmb. Tech N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CMBT or INSW or STNG or TNK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cmb.

Tech N. V. (CMBT) is pulling ahead at 77. 2% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teekay Tankers Ltd. grew EPS -13. 0% year-over-year, compared to -83. 6% for Cmb. Tech N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CMBT leads at 24. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CMBT or INSW or STNG or TNK?

Teekay Tankers Ltd.

(TNK) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 9% net margin versus 9. 6% for Cmb. Tech N. V. — meaning it keeps 36. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INSW leads at 36. 3% versus 22. 2% for CMBT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STNG leads at 46. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CMBT or INSW or STNG or TNK more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 16x versus Scorpio Tankers Inc. 's 0. 19x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) trades at 5. 1x forward P/E versus 7. 7x for Cmb. Tech N. V. — 2. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TNK: 14. 1% to $86. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CMBT or INSW or STNG or TNK?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 0. 6% for Cmb. Tech N. V. (CMBT).

09

Is CMBT or INSW or STNG or TNK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.

(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 31), 3. 6% yield, +978. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +978. 0%, CMBT: +191. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CMBT and INSW and STNG and TNK?

These companies operate in different sectors (CMBT (Industrials) and INSW (Energy) and STNG (Energy) and TNK (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CMBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; INSW is a small-cap deep-value stock; STNG is a small-cap deep-value stock; TNK is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.