Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
CMBT logo
CMBT
INSW logo
INSW
STNG logo
STNG
TNK logo
TNK
DHT logo
DHT
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CMBT vs INSW vs STNG vs TNK vs DHT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CMBT
Cmb.Tech N.V.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • BE
Market Cap$3.56B
5Y Perf.+90.2%
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.06B
5Y Perf.+401.9%
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • MC
Market Cap$4.09B
5Y Perf.+517.1%
TNK
Teekay Tankers Ltd.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$2.61B
5Y Perf.+488.1%
DHT
DHT Holdings, Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • BM
Market Cap$2.83B
5Y Perf.+242.5%

CMBT vs INSW vs STNG vs TNK vs DHT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CMBT logoCMBT
INSW logoINSW
STNG logoSTNG
TNK logoTNK
DHT logoDHT
IndustryMarine ShippingOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas MidstreamMarine ShippingOil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$3.56B$4.06B$4.09B$2.61B$2.83B
Revenue (TTM)$1.67B$985M$1.04B$1.01B$566M
Net Income (TTM)$161M$546M$502M$429M$331M
Gross Margin35.5%55.1%51.8%34.9%47.5%
Operating Margin27.4%50.4%38.8%31.0%50.1%
Forward P/E7.7x5.7x6.2x5.1x5.7x
Total Debt$5.57B$576M$619M$55M$429M
Cash & Equiv.$147M$117M$752M$831M$79M

CMBT vs INSW vs STNG vs TNK vs DHTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CMBT
INSW
STNG
TNK
DHT
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Cmb.Tech N.V. (CMBT)100190.2+90.2%
International Seawa… (INSW)100501.9+401.9%
Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG)100617.1+517.1%
Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK)100588.1+488.1%
DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT)100342.5+242.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CMBT vs INSW vs STNG vs TNK vs DHT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: STNG and DHT are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. DHT Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. CMBT, INSW, and TNK also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CMBT
Cmb.Tech N.V.
The Growth Play

CMBT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 77.2%, EPS growth -83.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.2%
  • 77.2% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
Best for: growth exposure
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

INSW is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 9.8% 10Y total return vs TNK's 214.6%
  • +138.1% vs DHT's +63.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
The Income Pick

STNG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 2.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 19.4%, current ratio 9.33x
  • Beta 0.12, yield 2.1%, current ratio 9.33x
  • Beta 0.12 vs CMBT's 0.42, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
TNK
Teekay Tankers Ltd.
The Value Pick

TNK is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.16 vs STNG's 0.19
  • Lower P/E (5.1x vs 5.7x)
Best for: valuation efficiency
DHT
DHT Holdings, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

DHT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 58.6% margin vs CMBT's 9.6%
  • 21.3% ROA vs CMBT's 1.9%, ROIC 8.9% vs 4.7%
Best for: quality and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCMBT logoCMBT77.2% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
ValueTNK logoTNKLower P/E (5.1x vs 5.7x)
Quality / MarginsDHT logoDHT58.6% margin vs CMBT's 9.6%
Stability / SafetySTNG logoSTNGBeta 0.12 vs CMBT's 0.42, lower leverage
DividendsSTNG logoSTNG2.1% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs DHT's 4.2%
Momentum (1Y)INSW logoINSW+138.1% vs DHT's +63.4%
Efficiency (ROA)DHT logoDHT21.3% ROA vs CMBT's 1.9%, ROIC 8.9% vs 4.7%

CMBT vs INSW vs STNG vs TNK vs DHT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CMBTCmb.Tech N.V.
FY 2025
Spot Voyages
84.7%$822M
Pool Revenue
15.3%$148M
INSWInternational Seaways, Inc.
FY 2025
Pool Revenue Leases
76.1%$642M
Time and Bareboat Charter Leases
18.7%$158M
Voyage Charter Leases
5.2%$44M
STNGScorpio Tankers Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

TNKTeekay Tankers Ltd.
FY 2025
Voyage charters
56.3%$785M
Voyage Charters - Suezmax
30.5%$425M
Other revenue
10.3%$143M
Time-charter
1.7%$23M
Ship-to-ship support services, Other revenue
1.1%$15M
Time Charters - Suezmax
0.3%$4M
DHTDHT Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Voyage Charter Revenues
70.7%$351M
Time Charter Revenues
29.3%$146M

CMBT vs INSW vs STNG vs TNK vs DHT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLINSWLAGGINGDHT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

INSW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CMBT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.7B annually — 2.9x DHT's $566M. DHT is the more profitable business, keeping 58.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMBT's 9.6%. On growth, CMBT holds the edge at +160.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…DHT logoDHTDHT Holdings, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.7B$985M$1.0B$1.0B$566M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$856M$661M$580M$398M$388M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$161M$546M$502M$429M$331M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$612M$122M$389M$138M-$131M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+35.5%+55.1%+51.8%+34.9%+47.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+27.4%+50.4%+38.8%+31.0%+50.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+9.6%+55.4%+48.4%+42.6%+58.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-36.7%+12.3%+37.5%+13.7%-23.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+160.6%+77.5%+46.2%+23.5%+57.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-35.4%+4.8%+2.5%+100.9%+2.8%
INSW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TNK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 7.5x trailing earnings, TNK trades at a 65% valuation discount to CMBT's 21.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TNK offers better value at 0.24x vs STNG's 0.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…DHT logoDHTDHT Holdings, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$3.6B$4.1B$4.1B$2.6B$2.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$9.0B$4.5B$4.0B$1.8B$3.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS21.23x13.16x11.24x7.47x13.41x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.67x5.69x6.25x5.12x5.68x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.34x0.24x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.84x9.62x8.08x6.09x11.51x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.13x4.81x4.36x2.74x5.69x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.36x2.01x1.21x1.28x2.49x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF106.47x8.33x23.19x
TNK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TNK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

DHT delivers a 29.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $6 for CMBT. TNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMBT's 2.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DHT scores 7/9 vs TNK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…DHT logoDHTDHT Holdings, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.2%+27.1%+15.9%+21.4%+29.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.9%+20.1%+12.6%+19.5%+21.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.7%+9.4%+7.2%+12.5%+8.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.8%+12.1%+8.4%+10.9%+11.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946647
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.12x0.29x0.19x0.03x0.38x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$5.4B$459M-$133M-$776M$350M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$147M$117M$752M$831M$79M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5.6B$576M$619M$55M$429M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.09x1.41x6.82x140.54x25.61x
TNK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TNK five years ago would be worth $55,324 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $26,907 for CMBT. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +138.1% total return vs DHT's +63.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INSW at 41.0% vs CMBT's 14.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…DHT logoDHTDHT Holdings, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+74.4%+88.8%+60.9%+49.3%+58.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+73.1%+138.1%+93.0%+68.8%+63.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+48.2%+180.6%+90.5%+125.8%+152.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+169.1%+434.7%+293.4%+453.2%+237.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+191.6%+978.0%+80.8%+214.6%+331.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+14.0%+41.0%+24.0%+31.2%+36.2%
INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

STNG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

STNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMBT's 0.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STNG currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs DHT's 85.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…DHT logoDHTDHT Holdings, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.42x0.31x0.12x0.31x0.24x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.72$92.66$87.39$83.99$20.55
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.78$36.03$38.83$41.05$10.61
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+87.5%+88.5%+90.5%+89.8%+85.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10049.753.643.545.042.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.6M497K901K398K2.9M
STNG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — STNG and DHT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CMBT as "Hold", INSW as "Buy", STNG as "Buy", TNK as "Buy", DHT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.1% upside for TNK (target: $86) vs 2.4% for DHT (target: $18). For income investors, DHT offers the higher dividend yield at 4.21% vs CMBT's 0.59%.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…DHT logoDHTDHT Holdings, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$86.67$87.00$86.00$18.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts313312316
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.6%+3.6%+2.1%+2.6%+4.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01300
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.09$2.92$1.69$1.98$0.74
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.0%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — STNG and DHT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

INSW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). TNK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallInternational Seaways, Inc. (INSW)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CMBT vs INSW vs STNG vs TNK vs DHT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CMBT or INSW or STNG or TNK or DHT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Cmb.

Tech N. V. (CMBT) is the stronger pick with 77. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E (5. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CMBT or INSW or STNG or TNK or DHT?

On trailing P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd.

(TNK) is the cheapest at 7. 5x versus Cmb. Tech N. V. at 21. 2x. On forward P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd. is actually cheaper at 5. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Teekay Tankers Ltd. wins at 0. 16x versus Scorpio Tankers Inc. 's 0. 19x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CMBT or INSW or STNG or TNK or DHT?

Over the past 5 years, Teekay Tankers Ltd.

(TNK) delivered a total return of +453. 2%, compared to +169. 1% for Cmb. Tech N. V. (CMBT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +978. 0% versus STNG's +80. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CMBT or INSW or STNG or TNK or DHT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Scorpio Tankers Inc.

(STNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Cmb. Tech N. V. 's 0. 42β — meaning CMBT is approximately 262% more volatile than STNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 2% for Cmb. Tech N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CMBT or INSW or STNG or TNK or DHT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cmb.

Tech N. V. (CMBT) is pulling ahead at 77. 2% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DHT Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 17. 0% year-over-year, compared to -83. 6% for Cmb. Tech N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CMBT leads at 24. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CMBT or INSW or STNG or TNK or DHT?

DHT Holdings, Inc.

(DHT) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 5% net margin versus 9. 6% for Cmb. Tech N. V. — meaning it keeps 42. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INSW leads at 36. 3% versus 22. 2% for CMBT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STNG leads at 46. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CMBT or INSW or STNG or TNK or DHT more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 16x versus Scorpio Tankers Inc. 's 0. 19x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) trades at 5. 1x forward P/E versus 7. 7x for Cmb. Tech N. V. — 2. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TNK: 14. 1% to $86. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CMBT or INSW or STNG or TNK or DHT?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 0. 6% for Cmb. Tech N. V. (CMBT).

09

Is CMBT or INSW or STNG or TNK or DHT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.

(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 31), 3. 6% yield, +978. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +978. 0%, CMBT: +191. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CMBT and INSW and STNG and TNK and DHT?

These companies operate in different sectors (CMBT (Industrials) and INSW (Energy) and STNG (Energy) and TNK (Industrials) and DHT (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CMBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; INSW is a small-cap deep-value stock; STNG is a small-cap deep-value stock; TNK is a small-cap deep-value stock; DHT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.