TNK
Teekay Tankers Ltd.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$2.76B
5Y Perf.+356.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TNK vs FRO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
FRO
Frontline Ltd.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$8.39B
5Y Perf.+312.9%
TNK vs FRO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TNK | FRO |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $2.76B | $8.39B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $952M | $1.77B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $351M | $218M |
| Gross Margin | 27.5% | 26.5% |
| Operating Margin | 27.5% | 25.5% |
| Forward P/E | 5.9x | 5.9x |
| Total Debt | $55M | $3.75B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $831M | $414M |
TNK vs FRO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TNK
FRO
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) | 100 | 456.7 | +356.7% |
| Frontline Ltd. (FRO) | 100 | 412.9 | +312.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TNK vs FRO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TNK leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Frontline Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TNK
Teekay Tankers Ltd.
The Income Pick
TNK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 2.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 2.7%, current ratio 7.98x
- PEG 0.19 vs FRO's 0.25
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
FRO
Frontline Ltd.
The Growth Play
FRO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 13.8%, EPS growth -24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.9%
- 5.1% 10Y total return vs TNK's 200.7%
- 13.8% revenue growth vs TNK's -22.6%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FRO | 13.8% revenue growth vs TNK's -22.6% |
| Value | TNK | Lower P/E (5.9x vs 5.9x), PEG 0.19 vs 0.25 |
| Quality / Margins | TNK | 36.9% margin vs FRO's 12.3% |
| Stability / Safety | TNK | Beta 0.35 vs FRO's 0.36, lower leverage |
| Dividends | FRO | 5.2% yield, vs TNK's 2.5% |
| Momentum (1Y) | FRO | +124.6% vs TNK's +76.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TNK | 15.7% ROA vs FRO's 3.8%, ROIC 12.5% vs 10.6% |
TNK vs FRO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2024
TNK vs FRO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTNKLAGGINGFRO
FROFrontline Ltd.
2leads
TNKTeekay Tankers Ltd.
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FROMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
TNK4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TNK6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
TNK7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
FRO5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
TNK2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
FRO1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TNK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FRO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 1.9x TNK's $952M. TNK is the more profitable business, keeping 36.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FRO's 12.3%. On growth, FRO holds the edge at -11.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TNKTeekay Tankers Lt… | FROFrontline Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $952M | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $348M | $781M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $351M | $218M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $113M | $557M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.5% | +26.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.5% | +25.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +36.9% | +12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +31.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -26.4% | -11.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +46.0% | -33.3% |
TNK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
TNK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.9x trailing earnings, TNK trades at a 54% valuation discount to FRO's 16.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TNK offers better value at 0.25x vs FRO's 0.72x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | TNKTeekay Tankers Lt… | FROFrontline Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.8B | $8.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $11.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.86x | 16.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.86x | 5.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.25x | 0.72x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.58x | 10.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.90x | 4.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.35x | 3.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.50x | — |
TNK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TNK leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TNK delivers a 17.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $9 for FRO. TNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FRO's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FRO scores 5/9 vs TNK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | TNKTeekay Tankers Lt… | FROFrontline Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.2% | +9.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +15.7% | +3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.5% | +10.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.9% | +14.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 1.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$776M | $3.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $831M | $414M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $55M | $3.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 109.95x | 1.87x |
TNK leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FRO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TNK five years ago would be worth $61,387 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $57,145 for FRO. Over the past 12 months, FRO leads with a +124.6% total return vs TNK's +76.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FRO at 44.3% vs TNK's 32.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TNKTeekay Tankers Lt… | FROFrontline Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +54.6% | +88.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +76.4% | +124.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +131.4% | +200.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +513.9% | +471.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +200.7% | +506.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.3% | +44.3% |
FRO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TNK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TNK is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FRO's 0.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | TNKTeekay Tankers Lt… | FROFrontline Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.35x | 0.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $83.54 | $39.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $41.05 | $16.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.0% | +94.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.1 | 64.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 547K | 4.0M |
TNK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
FRO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TNK as "Buy" and FRO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 13.4% upside for TNK (target: $90) vs 2.1% for FRO (target: $39). For income investors, FRO offers the higher dividend yield at 5.17% vs TNK's 2.50%.
| Metric | TNKTeekay Tankers Lt… | FROFrontline Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $90.00 | $38.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.5% | +5.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.98 | $1.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FRO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
TNK leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FRO leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook).
Best OverallTeekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TNK vs FRO: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TNK or FRO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Frontline Ltd.
(FRO) is the stronger pick with 13. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 6% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK). Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) offers the better valuation at 7. 9x trailing P/E (5. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TNK or FRO?
On trailing P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the cheapest at 7. 9x versus Frontline Ltd. at 16. 9x. On forward P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd. is actually cheaper at 5. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Teekay Tankers Ltd. wins at 0. 19x versus Frontline Ltd. 's 0. 25x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TNK or FRO?
Over the past 5 years, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) delivered a total return of +513. 9%, compared to +471. 4% for Frontline Ltd. (FRO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FRO returned +506. 8% versus TNK's +200. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TNK or FRO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Frontline Ltd. 's 0. 36β — meaning FRO is approximately 2% more volatile than TNK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 160% for Frontline Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TNK or FRO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Frontline Ltd.
(FRO) is pulling ahead at 13. 8% versus -22. 6% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teekay Tankers Ltd. grew EPS -13. 0% year-over-year, compared to -24. 4% for Frontline Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FRO leads at 39. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TNK or FRO?
Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 9% net margin versus 24. 2% for Frontline Ltd. — meaning it keeps 36. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FRO leads at 38. 1% versus 22. 6% for TNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FRO leads at 34. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TNK or FRO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus Frontline Ltd. 's 0. 25x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) trades at 5. 9x forward P/E versus 5. 9x for Frontline Ltd. — 0. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TNK: 13. 4% to $90. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TNK or FRO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Frontline Ltd. (FRO) offers the highest yield at 5. 2%, versus 2. 5% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK).
09Is TNK or FRO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Frontline Ltd.
(FRO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 36), 5. 2% yield, +506. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FRO: +506. 8%, TNK: +200. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TNK and FRO?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(TNK: -26.4% · FRO: -11.8%)Net Margin>
%
(TNK: 36.9% · FRO: 12.3%)P/E Ratio<
x
(TNK: 7.9x · FRO: 16.9x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.