Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
CMBT logo
CMBT
NAT logo
NAT
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CMBT vs NAT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CMBT
Cmb.Tech N.V.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • BE
Market Cap$3.56B
5Y Perf.+90.2%
NAT
Nordic American Tankers Limited

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • BM
Market Cap$1.18B
5Y Perf.+36.9%

CMBT vs NAT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CMBT logoCMBT
NAT logoNAT
IndustryMarine ShippingMarine Shipping
Market Cap$3.56B$1.18B
Revenue (TTM)$1.67B$334M
Net Income (TTM)$161M$54M
Gross Margin35.5%29.1%
Operating Margin27.4%19.8%
Forward P/E7.7x7.8x
Total Debt$5.57B$424M
Cash & Equiv.$147M$46M

CMBT vs NATLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CMBT
NAT
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Cmb.Tech N.V. (CMBT)100190.2+90.2%
Nordic American Tan… (NAT)100136.9+36.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CMBT vs NAT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NAT leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Cmb.Tech N.V. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇NAT emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
CMBT
Cmb.Tech N.V.
The Growth Play

CMBT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 77.2%, EPS growth -83.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.2%
  • 191.6% 10Y total return vs NAT's -41.3%
  • 77.2% revenue growth vs NAT's -16.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
NAT
Nordic American Tankers Limited
The Income Pick

NAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.24, yield 7.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.24, Low D/E 95.2%, current ratio 2.24x
  • Beta 0.24, yield 7.2%, current ratio 2.24x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCMBT logoCMBT77.2% revenue growth vs NAT's -16.4%
ValueCMBT logoCMBTLower P/E (7.7x vs 7.8x)
Quality / MarginsNAT logoNAT16.3% margin vs CMBT's 9.6%
Stability / SafetyNAT logoNATBeta 0.24 vs CMBT's 0.42, lower leverage
DividendsNAT logoNAT7.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs CMBT's 0.6%
Momentum (1Y)NAT logoNAT+129.8% vs CMBT's +73.1%
Efficiency (ROA)NAT logoNAT5.9% ROA vs CMBT's 1.9%, ROIC 2.8% vs 4.7%

CMBT vs NAT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CMBTCmb.Tech N.V.
FY 2025
Spot Voyages
84.7%$822M
Pool Revenue
15.3%$148M
NATNordic American Tankers Limited
FY 2025
Spot Charter
72.7%$212M
Time Charter
27.3%$80M

CMBT vs NAT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNATLAGGINGCMBT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — CMBT and NAT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CMBT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.7B annually — 5.0x NAT's $334M. NAT is the more profitable business, keeping 16.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMBT's 9.6%. On growth, CMBT holds the edge at +160.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.NAT logoNATNordic American T…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.7B$334M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$856M$124M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$161M$54M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$612M-$86M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+35.5%+29.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+27.4%+19.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+9.6%+16.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-36.7%-25.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+160.6%+64.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-35.4%+10.0%
Evenly matched — CMBT and NAT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CMBT leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 21.2x trailing earnings, CMBT trades at a 78% valuation discount to NAT's 95.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CMBT's 11.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NAT's 17.9x.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.NAT logoNATNordic American T…
Market CapShares × price$3.6B$1.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$9.0B$1.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS21.23x95.86x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.67x7.80x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.84x17.94x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.13x4.03x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.36x2.64x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
CMBT leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NAT leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

NAT delivers a 11.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $6 for CMBT. NAT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.95x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMBT's 2.12x.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.NAT logoNATNordic American T…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.2%+11.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.9%+5.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.7%+2.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.8%+3.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–944
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.12x0.95x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$5.4B$378M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$147M$46M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5.6B$424M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.09x2.47x
NAT leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CMBT five years ago would be worth $26,907 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20,883 for NAT. Over the past 12 months, NAT leads with a +129.8% total return vs CMBT's +73.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NAT at 24.4% vs CMBT's 14.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.NAT logoNATNordic American T…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+74.4%+76.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+73.1%+129.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+48.2%+92.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+169.1%+108.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+191.6%-41.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+14.0%+24.4%
NAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

NAT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

NAT is the less volatile stock with a 0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMBT's 0.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.NAT logoNATNordic American T…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.42x0.24x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.72$6.34
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.78$2.60
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+87.5%+87.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10049.739.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.6M3.6M
NAT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

NAT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates CMBT as "Hold" and NAT as "Hold". For income investors, NAT offers the higher dividend yield at 7.19% vs CMBT's 0.59%.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.NAT logoNATNordic American T…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts319
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.6%+7.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.09$0.40
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%
NAT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NAT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CMBT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallNordic American Tankers Lim… (NAT)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CMBT vs NAT: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CMBT or NAT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Cmb.

Tech N. V. (CMBT) is the stronger pick with 77. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 4% for Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT). Cmb. Tech N. V. (CMBT) offers the better valuation at 21. 2x trailing P/E (7. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cmb. Tech N. V. (CMBT) a "Hold" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CMBT or NAT?

On trailing P/E, Cmb.

Tech N. V. (CMBT) is the cheapest at 21. 2x versus Nordic American Tankers Limited at 95. 9x. On forward P/E, Cmb. Tech N. V. is actually cheaper at 7. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CMBT or NAT?

Over the past 5 years, Cmb.

Tech N. V. (CMBT) delivered a total return of +169. 1%, compared to +108. 8% for Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CMBT returned +191. 6% versus NAT's -41. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CMBT or NAT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

24β versus Cmb. Tech N. V. 's 0. 42β — meaning CMBT is approximately 74% more volatile than NAT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 95% versus 2% for Cmb. Tech N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CMBT or NAT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cmb.

Tech N. V. (CMBT) is pulling ahead at 77. 2% versus -16. 4% for Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nordic American Tankers Limited grew EPS -73. 6% year-over-year, compared to -83. 6% for Cmb. Tech N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CMBT leads at 24. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CMBT or NAT?

Cmb.

Tech N. V. (CMBT) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 6% net margin versus 4. 2% for Nordic American Tankers Limited — meaning it keeps 9. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CMBT leads at 22. 2% versus 9. 9% for NAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CMBT leads at 28. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CMBT or NAT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Cmb.

Tech N. V. (CMBT) trades at 7. 7x forward P/E versus 7. 8x for Nordic American Tankers Limited — 0. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CMBT or NAT?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) offers the highest yield at 7. 2%, versus 0. 6% for Cmb. Tech N. V. (CMBT).

09

Is CMBT or NAT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

24), 7. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NAT: -41. 3%, CMBT: +191. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CMBT and NAT?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CMBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; NAT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.