Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NAT vs TNK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
NAT vs TNK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $1.22B | $2.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $281M | $952M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $351M |
| Gross Margin | 16.6% | 27.5% |
| Operating Margin | 6.2% | 27.5% |
| Forward P/E | 10.3x | 5.9x |
| Total Debt | $270M | $55M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $39M | $831M |
NAT vs TNK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nordic American Tan… (NAT) | 100 | 126.3 | +26.3% |
| Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) | 100 | 456.7 | +356.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NAT vs TNK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 7.2%
- Rev growth -10.7%, EPS growth -53.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 53.0%, current ratio 1.65x
TNK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 200.7% 10Y total return vs NAT's -38.2%
- Lower P/E (5.9x vs 10.3x)
- 36.9% margin vs NAT's 0.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -10.7% revenue growth vs TNK's -22.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.9x vs 10.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.9% margin vs NAT's 0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs TNK's 0.35 | |
| Dividends | 7.2% yield, vs TNK's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +135.5% vs TNK's +76.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.7% ROA vs NAT's 0.2%, ROIC 12.5% vs 7.5% |
NAT vs TNK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NAT vs TNK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TNK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TNK is the larger business by revenue, generating $952M annually — 3.4x NAT's $281M. TNK is the more profitable business, keeping 36.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NAT's 0.7%. On growth, NAT holds the edge at -8.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $281M | $952M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $75M | $348M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $351M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$112M | $113M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | +27.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +27.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +36.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -39.8% | +11.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.8% | -26.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -131.5% | +46.0% |
Valuation Metrics
TNK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.9x trailing earnings, TNK trades at a 70% valuation discount to NAT's 26.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TNK's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NAT's 10.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $2.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.23x | 7.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.26x | 5.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.25x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.88x | 6.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.49x | 2.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.38x | 1.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.73x | 24.50x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TNK leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TNK delivers a 17.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $0 for NAT. TNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NAT's 0.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NAT scores 5/9 vs TNK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.4% | +17.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.2% | +15.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.5% | +12.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.9% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $231M | -$776M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $39M | $831M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $270M | $55M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.06x | 109.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TNK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TNK five years ago would be worth $61,387 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $21,976 for NAT. Over the past 12 months, NAT leads with a +135.5% total return vs TNK's +76.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TNK at 32.3% vs NAT's 27.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +76.3% | +54.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +135.5% | +76.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.2% | +131.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +119.8% | +513.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -38.2% | +200.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.1% | +32.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NAT and TNK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NAT is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TNK's 0.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TNK currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs NAT's 91.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.27x | 0.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.34 | $83.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.54 | $41.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.0% | +95.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.1 | 68.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.3M | 547K |
Analyst Outlook
NAT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NAT as "Hold" and TNK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.4% upside for TNK (target: $90) vs -39.3% for NAT (target: $4). For income investors, NAT offers the higher dividend yield at 7.24% vs TNK's 2.50%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.50 | $90.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.2% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.42 | $1.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% |
TNK leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NAT leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
NAT vs TNK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NAT or TNK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) is the stronger pick with -10.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 6% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK). Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) offers the better valuation at 7. 9x trailing P/E (5. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NAT or TNK?
On trailing P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the cheapest at 7. 9x versus Nordic American Tankers Limited at 26. 2x. On forward P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd. is actually cheaper at 5. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NAT or TNK?
Over the past 5 years, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) delivered a total return of +513. 9%, compared to +119. 8% for Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TNK returned +200. 7% versus NAT's -38. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NAT or TNK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
27β versus Teekay Tankers Ltd. 's 0. 35β — meaning TNK is approximately 29% more volatile than NAT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 53% for Nordic American Tankers Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NAT or TNK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) is pulling ahead at -10.
7% versus -22. 6% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teekay Tankers Ltd. grew EPS -13. 0% year-over-year, compared to -53. 2% for Nordic American Tankers Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, NAT leads at 21. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NAT or TNK?
Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 9% net margin versus 13. 3% for Nordic American Tankers Limited — meaning it keeps 36. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TNK leads at 22. 6% versus 22. 1% for NAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NAT leads at 30. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NAT or TNK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) trades at 5. 9x forward P/E versus 10. 3x for Nordic American Tankers Limited — 4. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TNK: 13. 4% to $90. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NAT or TNK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) offers the highest yield at 7. 2%, versus 2. 5% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK).
09Is NAT or TNK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), 2. 5% yield, +200. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TNK: +200. 7%, NAT: -38. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NAT and TNK?
These companies operate in different sectors (NAT (Industrials) and TNK (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NAT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TNK is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.