Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
CMBT logo
CMBT
STNG logo
STNG
INSW logo
INSW
TRMD logo
TRMD
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CMBT vs STNG vs INSW vs TRMD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CMBT
Cmb.Tech N.V.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • BE
Market Cap$3.56B
5Y Perf.+90.2%
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • MC
Market Cap$4.09B
5Y Perf.+517.1%
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.06B
5Y Perf.+401.9%
TRMD
TORM plc

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNASDAQ • GB
Market Cap$3.10B
5Y Perf.+355.1%

CMBT vs STNG vs INSW vs TRMD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CMBT logoCMBT
STNG logoSTNG
INSW logoINSW
TRMD logoTRMD
IndustryMarine ShippingOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$3.56B$4.09B$4.06B$3.10B
Revenue (TTM)$1.67B$1.04B$985M$1.41B
Net Income (TTM)$161M$502M$546M$344M
Gross Margin35.5%51.8%55.1%40.8%
Operating Margin27.4%38.8%50.4%28.8%
Forward P/E7.7x6.2x5.7x4.3x
Total Debt$5.57B$619M$576M$1.01B
Cash & Equiv.$147M$752M$117M$163M

CMBT vs STNG vs INSW vs TRMDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CMBT
STNG
INSW
TRMD
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Cmb.Tech N.V. (CMBT)100190.2+90.2%
Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG)100617.1+517.1%
International Seawa… (INSW)100501.9+401.9%
TORM plc (TRMD)100455.1+355.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CMBT vs STNG vs INSW vs TRMD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: STNG and INSW are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. International Seaways, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. CMBT also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CMBT
Cmb.Tech N.V.
The Growth Play

CMBT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 77.2%, EPS growth -83.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.2%
  • 77.2% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
Best for: growth exposure
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
The Income Pick

STNG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 2.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 19.4%, current ratio 9.33x
  • PEG 0.19 vs TRMD's 0.23
  • Beta 0.12, yield 2.1%, current ratio 9.33x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

INSW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 9.8% 10Y total return vs TRMD's 5.6%
  • 55.4% margin vs CMBT's 9.6%
  • +138.1% vs CMBT's +73.1%
  • 20.1% ROA vs CMBT's 1.9%, ROIC 9.4% vs 4.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
TRMD
TORM plc
The Income Angle

TRMD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: energy exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCMBT logoCMBT77.2% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
ValueSTNG logoSTNGBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsINSW logoINSW55.4% margin vs CMBT's 9.6%
Stability / SafetySTNG logoSTNGBeta 0.12 vs CMBT's 0.42, lower leverage
DividendsSTNG logoSTNG2.1% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs TRMD's 6.8%
Momentum (1Y)INSW logoINSW+138.1% vs CMBT's +73.1%
Efficiency (ROA)INSW logoINSW20.1% ROA vs CMBT's 1.9%, ROIC 9.4% vs 4.7%

CMBT vs STNG vs INSW vs TRMD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CMBTCmb.Tech N.V.
FY 2025
Spot Voyages
84.7%$822M
Pool Revenue
15.3%$148M
STNGScorpio Tankers Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

INSWInternational Seaways, Inc.
FY 2025
Pool Revenue Leases
76.1%$642M
Time and Bareboat Charter Leases
18.7%$158M
Voyage Charter Leases
5.2%$44M
TRMDTORM plc
FY 2025
Others
100.0%$2M

CMBT vs STNG vs INSW vs TRMD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLINSWLAGGINGTRMD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

INSW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

CMBT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.7B annually — 1.7x INSW's $985M. INSW is the more profitable business, keeping 55.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMBT's 9.6%. On growth, CMBT holds the edge at +160.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…TRMD logoTRMDTORM plc
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.7B$1.0B$985M$1.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$856M$580M$661M$626M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$161M$502M$546M$344M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$612M$389M$122M$80M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+35.5%+51.8%+55.1%+40.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+27.4%+38.8%+50.4%+28.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+9.6%+48.4%+55.4%+24.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-36.7%+37.5%+12.3%+5.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+160.6%+46.2%+77.5%+20.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-35.4%+2.5%+4.8%+88.7%
INSW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — STNG and TRMD each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.3x trailing earnings, TRMD trades at a 52% valuation discount to CMBT's 21.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), STNG offers better value at 0.34x vs TRMD's 0.56x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…TRMD logoTRMDTORM plc
Market CapShares × price$3.6B$4.1B$4.1B$3.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$9.0B$4.0B$4.5B$4.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS21.23x11.24x13.16x10.27x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.67x6.25x5.69x4.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.34x0.56x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.84x8.08x9.62x6.84x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.13x4.36x4.81x2.23x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.36x1.21x2.01x1.38x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.33x106.47x15.71x
Evenly matched — STNG and TRMD each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

INSW leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

INSW delivers a 27.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $6 for CMBT. STNG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMBT's 2.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STNG scores 6/9 vs TRMD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…TRMD logoTRMDTORM plc
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.2%+15.9%+27.1%+15.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.9%+12.6%+20.1%+10.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.7%+7.2%+9.4%+8.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.8%+8.4%+12.1%+11.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94664
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.12x0.19x0.29x0.46x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$5.4B-$133M$459M$848M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$147M$752M$117M$163M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5.6B$619M$576M$1.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.09x6.82x1.41x5.55x
INSW leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TRMD five years ago would be worth $53,715 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $26,907 for CMBT. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +138.1% total return vs CMBT's +73.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INSW at 41.0% vs CMBT's 14.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…TRMD logoTRMDTORM plc
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+74.4%+60.9%+88.8%+60.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+73.1%+93.0%+138.1%+80.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+48.2%+90.5%+180.6%+73.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+169.1%+293.4%+434.7%+437.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+191.6%+80.8%+978.0%+559.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+14.0%+24.0%+41.0%+20.2%
INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

STNG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

STNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMBT's 0.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STNG currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs TRMD's 86.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…TRMD logoTRMDTORM plc
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.42x0.12x0.31x0.33x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.72$87.39$92.66$35.33
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.78$38.83$36.03$16.36
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+87.5%+90.5%+88.5%+86.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10049.743.553.643.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.6M901K497K812K
STNG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — STNG and TRMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CMBT as "Hold", STNG as "Buy", INSW as "Buy", TRMD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.1% upside for TRMD (target: $35) vs 5.7% for INSW (target: $87). For income investors, TRMD offers the higher dividend yield at 6.81% vs CMBT's 0.59%.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…TRMD logoTRMDTORM plc
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$87.00$86.67$35.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts331133
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.6%+2.1%+3.6%+6.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0310
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.09$1.69$2.92$2.07
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.0%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — STNG and TRMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

INSW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). STNG leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.

Best OverallInternational Seaways, Inc. (INSW)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CMBT vs STNG vs INSW vs TRMD: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CMBT or STNG or INSW or TRMD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Cmb.

Tech N. V. (CMBT) is the stronger pick with 77. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). TORM plc (TRMD) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (4. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CMBT or STNG or INSW or TRMD?

On trailing P/E, TORM plc (TRMD) is the cheapest at 10.

3x versus Cmb. Tech N. V. at 21. 2x. On forward P/E, TORM plc is actually cheaper at 4. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Scorpio Tankers Inc. wins at 0. 19x versus TORM plc's 0. 23x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CMBT or STNG or INSW or TRMD?

Over the past 5 years, TORM plc (TRMD) delivered a total return of +437.

1%, compared to +169. 1% for Cmb. Tech N. V. (CMBT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +978. 0% versus STNG's +80. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CMBT or STNG or INSW or TRMD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Scorpio Tankers Inc.

(STNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Cmb. Tech N. V. 's 0. 42β — meaning CMBT is approximately 262% more volatile than STNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 2% for Cmb. Tech N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CMBT or STNG or INSW or TRMD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cmb.

Tech N. V. (CMBT) is pulling ahead at 77. 2% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: International Seaways, Inc. grew EPS -25. 7% year-over-year, compared to -83. 6% for Cmb. Tech N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CMBT leads at 24. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CMBT or STNG or INSW or TRMD?

Scorpio Tankers Inc.

(STNG) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 7% net margin versus 9. 6% for Cmb. Tech N. V. — meaning it keeps 36. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INSW leads at 36. 3% versus 22. 2% for CMBT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STNG leads at 46. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CMBT or STNG or INSW or TRMD more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus TORM plc's 0. 23x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, TORM plc (TRMD) trades at 4. 3x forward P/E versus 7. 7x for Cmb. Tech N. V. — 3. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRMD: 15. 1% to $35. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CMBT or STNG or INSW or TRMD?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

TORM plc (TRMD) offers the highest yield at 6. 8%, versus 0. 6% for Cmb. Tech N. V. (CMBT).

09

Is CMBT or STNG or INSW or TRMD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.

(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 31), 3. 6% yield, +978. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +978. 0%, CMBT: +191. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CMBT and STNG and INSW and TRMD?

These companies operate in different sectors (CMBT (Industrials) and STNG (Energy) and INSW (Energy) and TRMD (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CMBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; STNG is a small-cap deep-value stock; INSW is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRMD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.