Marine Shipping
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
CMBT vs STNG vs KO vs INSW vs TRMD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
CMBT vs STNG vs KO vs INSW vs TRMD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Midstream | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $3.56B | $4.09B | $355.61B | $4.06B | $3.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.67B | $1.04B | $49.28B | $985M | $1.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $161M | $502M | $13.70B | $546M | $344M |
| Gross Margin | 35.5% | 51.8% | 61.7% | 55.1% | 40.8% |
| Operating Margin | 27.4% | 38.8% | 29.3% | 50.4% | 28.8% |
| Forward P/E | 7.7x | 6.2x | 25.3x | 5.7x | 4.3x |
| Total Debt | $5.57B | $619M | $45.49B | $576M | $1.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $147M | $752M | $10.27B | $117M | $163M |
CMBT vs STNG vs KO vs INSW vs TRMD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cmb.Tech N.V. (CMBT) | 100 | 190.2 | +90.2% |
| Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) | 100 | 617.1 | +517.1% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| International Seawa… (INSW) | 100 | 501.9 | +401.9% |
| TORM plc (TRMD) | 100 | 455.1 | +355.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CMBT vs STNG vs KO vs INSW vs TRMD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CMBT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 77.2% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
STNG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 19.4%, current ratio 9.33x
- PEG 0.19 vs KO's 2.26
- Beta 0.12, yield 2.1%, current ratio 9.33x
- Better valuation composite
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 1.9%, EPS growth 23.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
INSW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.31, yield 3.6%
- 9.8% 10Y total return vs TRMD's 5.6%
- 55.4% margin vs CMBT's 9.6%
- +138.1% vs KO's +17.2%
TRMD is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 6.8% yield, vs KO's 2.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 77.2% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.4% margin vs CMBT's 9.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs CMBT's 0.42, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.8% yield, vs KO's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +138.1% vs KO's +17.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.1% ROA vs CMBT's 1.9%, ROIC 9.4% vs 4.7% |
CMBT vs STNG vs KO vs INSW vs TRMD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CMBT vs STNG vs KO vs INSW vs TRMD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
INSW leads in 2 of 6 categories
KO leads 2 • CMBT leads 0 • STNG leads 0 • TRMD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INSW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 50.0x INSW's $985M. INSW is the more profitable business, keeping 55.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMBT's 9.6%. On growth, CMBT holds the edge at +160.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $1.0B | $49.3B | $985M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $856M | $580M | $15.5B | $661M | $626M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $161M | $502M | $13.7B | $546M | $344M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$612M | $389M | $12.6B | $122M | $80M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.5% | +51.8% | +61.7% | +55.1% | +40.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.4% | +38.8% | +29.3% | +50.4% | +28.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.6% | +48.4% | +27.8% | +55.4% | +24.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -36.7% | +37.5% | +25.5% | +12.3% | +5.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +160.6% | +46.2% | +12.1% | +77.5% | +20.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.4% | +2.5% | +18.2% | +4.8% | +88.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — STNG and TRMD each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.3x trailing earnings, TRMD trades at a 62% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), STNG offers better value at 0.34x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.6B | $4.1B | $355.6B | $4.1B | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.0B | $4.0B | $390.8B | $4.5B | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.23x | 11.24x | 27.18x | 13.16x | 10.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.67x | 6.25x | 25.27x | 5.69x | 4.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.34x | 2.43x | — | 0.56x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.84x | 8.08x | 26.39x | 9.62x | 6.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.13x | 4.36x | 7.42x | 4.81x | 2.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.36x | 1.21x | 10.40x | 2.01x | 1.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.33x | 67.15x | 106.47x | 15.71x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $6 for CMBT. STNG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMBT's 2.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs TRMD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.2% | +15.9% | +41.1% | +27.1% | +15.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | +12.6% | +13.1% | +20.1% | +10.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.7% | +7.2% | +15.8% | +9.4% | +8.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.8% | +8.4% | +17.3% | +12.1% | +11.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.12x | 0.19x | 1.33x | 0.29x | 0.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.4B | -$133M | $35.2B | $459M | $848M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $147M | $752M | $10.3B | $117M | $163M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.6B | $619M | $45.5B | $576M | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.09x | 6.82x | 10.70x | 1.41x | 5.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRMD five years ago would be worth $53,715 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,560 for KO. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +138.1% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INSW at 41.0% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +74.4% | +60.9% | +20.3% | +88.8% | +60.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +73.1% | +93.0% | +17.2% | +138.1% | +80.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.2% | +90.5% | +47.0% | +180.6% | +73.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +169.1% | +293.4% | +65.6% | +434.7% | +437.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +191.6% | +80.8% | +121.1% | +978.0% | +559.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.0% | +24.0% | +13.7% | +41.0% | +20.2% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMBT's 0.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs TRMD's 86.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.42x | 0.12x | -0.20x | 0.31x | 0.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.72 | $87.39 | $84.04 | $92.66 | $35.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.78 | $38.83 | $65.35 | $36.03 | $16.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.5% | +90.5% | +98.3% | +88.5% | +86.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.7 | 43.5 | 60.6 | 53.6 | 43.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 901K | 12.7M | 497K | 812K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KO and TRMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CMBT as "Hold", STNG as "Buy", KO as "Buy", INSW as "Buy", TRMD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.1% upside for TRMD (target: $35) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, TRMD offers the higher dividend yield at 6.81% vs CMBT's 0.59%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $87.00 | $86.13 | $86.67 | $35.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 31 | 48 | 13 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.6% | +2.1% | +2.5% | +3.6% | +6.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 56 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.09 | $1.69 | $2.04 | $2.92 | $2.07 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
INSW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). KO leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
CMBT vs STNG vs KO vs INSW vs TRMD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMBT or STNG or KO or INSW or TRMD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cmb.
Tech N. V. (CMBT) is the stronger pick with 77. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). TORM plc (TRMD) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (4. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CMBT or STNG or KO or INSW or TRMD?
On trailing P/E, TORM plc (TRMD) is the cheapest at 10.
3x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, TORM plc is actually cheaper at 4. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Scorpio Tankers Inc. wins at 0. 19x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CMBT or STNG or KO or INSW or TRMD?
Over the past 5 years, TORM plc (TRMD) delivered a total return of +437.
1%, compared to +65. 6% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +978. 0% versus STNG's +80. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CMBT or STNG or KO or INSW or TRMD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Cmb. Tech N. V. 's 0. 42β — meaning CMBT is approximately -310% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 2% for Cmb. Tech N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CMBT or STNG or KO or INSW or TRMD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cmb.
Tech N. V. (CMBT) is pulling ahead at 77. 2% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -83. 6% for Cmb. Tech N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CMBT leads at 24. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CMBT or STNG or KO or INSW or TRMD?
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
(STNG) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 7% net margin versus 9. 6% for Cmb. Tech N. V. — meaning it keeps 36. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INSW leads at 36. 3% versus 22. 2% for CMBT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CMBT or STNG or KO or INSW or TRMD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, TORM plc (TRMD) trades at 4. 3x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 21. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRMD: 15. 1% to $35. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CMBT or STNG or KO or INSW or TRMD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TORM plc (TRMD) offers the highest yield at 6. 8%, versus 0. 6% for Cmb. Tech N. V. (CMBT).
09Is CMBT or STNG or KO or INSW or TRMD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 31), 3. 6% yield, +978. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +978. 0%, CMBT: +191. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CMBT and STNG and KO and INSW and TRMD?
These companies operate in different sectors (CMBT (Industrials) and STNG (Energy) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and INSW (Energy) and TRMD (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CMBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; STNG is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; INSW is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRMD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.