Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CMCM vs WB vs MOMO vs JOYY vs GOOGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
CMCM vs WB vs MOMO vs JOYY vs GOOGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $3M | $1.33B | $2.16B | $3.17B | $4.81T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.08B | $1.76B | $10.29B | $2.24B | $422.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-434M | $372M | $800M | $-146M | $160.21B |
| Gross Margin | 74.3% | 78.2% | 37.7% | 36.0% | 60.4% |
| Operating Margin | -22.3% | 29.2% | 12.7% | -18.1% | 32.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 5.2x | 1.1x | 1.6x | 29.6x |
| Total Debt | $75M | $1.91B | $129M | $31M | $59.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.83B | $1.89B | $5.44B | $445M | $30.71B |
CMCM vs WB vs MOMO vs JOYY vs GOOGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheetah Mobile Inc. (CMCM) | 100 | 38.9 | -61.1% |
| Weibo Corporation (WB) | 100 | 27.5 | -72.5% |
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | 100 | 32.7 | -67.3% |
| JOYY, Inc. Sponsore… (JOYY) | 100 | 96.6 | -3.4% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 555.2 | +455.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CMCM vs WB vs MOMO vs JOYY vs GOOGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CMCM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 20.5%, EPS growth -0.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.9%
- 20.5% revenue growth vs MOMO's -5.9%
WB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.93, yield 8.7%
- 8.7% yield, vs GOOGL's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
MOMO is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.78, Low D/E 1.2%, current ratio 4.68x
- Beta 0.78, yield 4.6%, current ratio 4.68x
- Lower P/E (1.1x vs 29.6x)
JOYY is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.64 vs CMCM's 1.56, lower leverage
GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs JOYY's 46.8%
- 37.9% margin vs CMCM's -40.2%
- +163.5% vs WB's +7.8%
- 27.4% ROA vs CMCM's -8.4%, ROIC 25.1% vs -58.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.5% revenue growth vs MOMO's -5.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.1x vs 29.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs CMCM's -40.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.64 vs CMCM's 1.56, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 8.7% yield, vs GOOGL's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +163.5% vs WB's +7.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs CMCM's -8.4%, ROIC 25.1% vs -58.3% |
CMCM vs WB vs MOMO vs JOYY vs GOOGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CMCM vs WB vs MOMO vs JOYY vs GOOGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOOGL leads in 3 of 6 categories
CMCM leads 0 • WB leads 0 • MOMO leads 0 • JOYY leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 391.7x CMCM's $1.1B. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMCM's -40.2%. On growth, CMCM holds the edge at +49.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $1.8B | $10.3B | $2.2B | $422.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$62M | $535M | $1.4B | -$317M | $161.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$434M | $372M | $800M | -$146M | $160.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $0 | $685M | $0 | $73.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.3% | +78.2% | +37.7% | +36.0% | +60.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -22.3% | +29.2% | +12.7% | -18.1% | +32.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -40.2% | +21.1% | +7.8% | -6.5% | +37.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -32.4% | +33.0% | +6.7% | +10.0% | +17.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +49.6% | +1.6% | -5.1% | -3.6% | +21.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +77.4% | +11.9% | +32.1% | -9.2% | +81.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CMCM and WB each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.3x trailing earnings, WB trades at a 80% valuation discount to GOOGL's 36.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WB's 2.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GOOGL's 32.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $1.3B | $2.2B | $3.2B | $4.81T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$255M | $1.3B | $1.4B | $2.8B | $4.84T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.04x | 7.29x | 9.34x | -22.69x | 36.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 5.22x | 1.08x | 1.62x | 29.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 2.37x | 6.91x | — | 32.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.03x | 0.76x | 1.46x | 1.42x | 11.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 0.63x | 0.66x | 0.72x | 11.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.30x | 21.90x | 14.14x | 65.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-20 for CMCM. JOYY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WB's 0.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WB scores 7/9 vs CMCM's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -19.8% | +10.3% | +7.2% | -2.8% | +39.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.4% | +5.7% | +5.3% | -1.8% | +27.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -58.3% | +10.3% | +10.9% | -6.7% | +25.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.4% | +9.0% | +10.8% | -7.9% | +30.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.53x | 0.01x | 0.01x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.8B | $15M | -$5.3B | -$414M | $28.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.8B | $1.9B | $5.4B | $445M | $30.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $75M | $1.9B | $129M | $31M | $59.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 5.11x | 18.04x | 30.37x | 392.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,413 for WB. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +163.5% total return vs WB's +7.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs WB's -10.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.9% | -13.9% | +1.6% | -3.1% | +26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.9% | +7.8% | +16.2% | +50.9% | +163.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +128.8% | -28.6% | -5.7% | +123.0% | +270.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.0% | -75.9% | -36.7% | -19.9% | +239.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.0% | -46.4% | -9.4% | +46.8% | +996.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.8% | -10.6% | -1.9% | +30.6% | +54.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JOYY and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JOYY is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMCM's 1.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs CMCM's 56.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.56x | 0.93x | 0.78x | 0.64x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.44 | $12.96 | $9.22 | $70.96 | $400.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.65 | $8.10 | $5.68 | $41.77 | $147.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.5% | +65.3% | +68.8% | +83.1% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.2 | 43.6 | 61.2 | 53.2 | 83.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 27K | 1.1M | 648K | 282K | 28.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CMCM and WB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CMCM as "Buy", WB as "Buy", MOMO as "Buy", JOYY as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 103.1% upside for WB (target: $17) vs 2.1% for GOOGL (target: $406). For income investors, WB offers the higher dividend yield at 8.66% vs GOOGL's 0.21%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.18 | $8.10 | $66.00 | $406.28 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 22 | 16 | 5 | 82 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +8.7% | +4.6% | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.73 | $1.99 | — | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.1% | +8.2% | +0.9% |
GOOGL leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
CMCM vs WB vs MOMO vs JOYY vs GOOGL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMCM or WB or MOMO or JOYY or GOOGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cheetah Mobile Inc.
(CMCM) is the stronger pick with 20. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 9% for Hello Group Inc. (MOMO). Weibo Corporation (WB) offers the better valuation at 7. 3x trailing P/E (5. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cheetah Mobile Inc. (CMCM) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CMCM or WB or MOMO or JOYY or GOOGL?
On trailing P/E, Weibo Corporation (WB) is the cheapest at 7.
3x versus Alphabet Inc. at 36. 8x. On forward P/E, Hello Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CMCM or WB or MOMO or JOYY or GOOGL?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +239. 8%, compared to -75. 9% for Weibo Corporation (WB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +996. 1% versus CMCM's -79. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CMCM or WB or MOMO or JOYY or GOOGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JOYY, Inc.
Sponsored ADR Class A (JOYY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus Cheetah Mobile Inc. 's 1. 56β — meaning CMCM is approximately 142% more volatile than JOYY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, JOYY, Inc. Sponsored ADR Class A (JOYY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 53% for Weibo Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CMCM or WB or MOMO or JOYY or GOOGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cheetah Mobile Inc.
(CMCM) is pulling ahead at 20. 5% versus -5. 9% for Hello Group Inc. (MOMO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alphabet Inc. grew EPS 34. 5% year-over-year, compared to -154. 2% for JOYY, Inc. Sponsored ADR Class A. Over a 3-year CAGR, GOOGL leads at 12. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CMCM or WB or MOMO or JOYY or GOOGL?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus -76. 5% for Cheetah Mobile Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus -54. 2% for CMCM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WB leads at 78. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CMCM or WB or MOMO or JOYY or GOOGL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) trades at 1. 1x forward P/E versus 29. 6x for Alphabet Inc. — 28. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WB: 103. 1% to $17. 18.
08Which pays a better dividend — CMCM or WB or MOMO or JOYY or GOOGL?
In this comparison, WB (8.
7% yield), MOMO (4. 6% yield), GOOGL (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. CMCM, JOYY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CMCM or WB or MOMO or JOYY or GOOGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 78), 4. 6% yield). Cheetah Mobile Inc. (CMCM) carries a higher beta of 1. 56 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MOMO: -9. 4%, CMCM: -79. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CMCM and WB and MOMO and JOYY and GOOGL?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CMCM is a small-cap high-growth stock; WB is a small-cap deep-value stock; MOMO is a small-cap deep-value stock; JOYY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock. WB, MOMO pay a dividend while CMCM, JOYY, GOOGL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 24%
- Gross Margin > 44%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 12%
- Dividend Yield > 3.4%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.