CMCO
Columbus McKinnon Corporation
Agricultural - Machinery
Market Cap$454M
5Y Perf.-48.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CMCO vs ITT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
ITT
ITT Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$18.56B
5Y Perf.+259.9%
CMCO vs ITT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CMCO | ITT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $454M | $18.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.00B | $4.24B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $458M |
| Gross Margin | 33.6% | 35.5% |
| Operating Margin | 3.9% | 15.9% |
| Forward P/E | 7.4x | 27.1x |
| Total Debt | $541M | $927M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $54M | $1.74B |
CMCO vs ITT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CMCO
ITT
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Columbus McKinnon C… (CMCO) | 100 | 52.0 | -48.0% |
| ITT Inc. (ITT) | 100 | 359.9 | +259.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CMCO vs ITT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ITT leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Columbus McKinnon Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CMCO
Columbus McKinnon Corporation
The Value Play
CMCO is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (7.4x vs 27.1x)
- 1.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ITT's 0.7%
Best for: value and dividends
ITT
ITT Inc.
The Income Pick
ITT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 1.23, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 8.5%, EPS growth -3.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.6%
- 5.3% 10Y total return vs CMCO's 22.3%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ITT | 8.5% revenue growth vs CMCO's -5.0% |
| Value | CMCO | Lower P/E (7.4x vs 27.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | ITT | 10.8% margin vs CMCO's 0.6% |
| Stability / Safety | ITT | Beta 1.23 vs CMCO's 2.32, lower leverage |
| Dividends | CMCO | 1.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ITT's 0.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | ITT | +47.8% vs CMCO's +4.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ITT | 6.7% ROA vs CMCO's 0.3%, ROIC 16.1% vs 3.0% |
CMCO vs ITT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2022
CMCO vs ITT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLITTLAGGINGCMCO
CMCOColumbus McKinnon Cor…
1leads
ITTITT Inc.
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CMCOMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ITT5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CMCO6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ITT8/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
ITT6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
ITT2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ITT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ITT is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.2B annually — 4.2x CMCO's $1.0B. ITT is the more profitable business, keeping 10.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMCO's 0.6%. On growth, ITT holds the edge at +32.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CMCOColumbus McKinnon… | ITTITT Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $4.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $75M | $781M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6M | $458M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $40M | $485M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.6% | +35.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +15.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.6% | +10.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | +11.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.5% | +32.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +50.0% | -33.1% |
ITT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CMCO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CMCO's 9.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ITT's 21.4x.
| Metric | CMCOColumbus McKinnon… | ITTITT Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $454M | $18.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $941M | $17.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -87.78x | 33.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.39x | 27.11x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.69x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.16x | 21.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.47x | 4.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.51x | 4.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.76x | 33.91x |
CMCO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ITT leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ITT delivers a 13.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $1 for CMCO. ITT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMCO's 0.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ITT scores 7/9 vs CMCO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | CMCOColumbus McKinnon… | ITTITT Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.7% | +13.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.3% | +6.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.0% | +16.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.6% | +16.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.61x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $487M | -$816M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $54M | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $541M | $927M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.70x | 8.60x |
ITT leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ITT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ITT five years ago would be worth $21,583 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,278 for CMCO. Over the past 12 months, ITT leads with a +47.8% total return vs CMCO's +4.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ITT at 36.2% vs CMCO's -21.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CMCOColumbus McKinnon… | ITTITT Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.3% | +19.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.8% | +47.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.7% | +152.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.2% | +115.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.3% | +531.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.5% | +36.2% |
ITT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ITT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ITT is the less volatile stock with a 1.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMCO's 2.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ITT currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs CMCO's 64.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CMCOColumbus McKinnon… | ITTITT Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.32x | 1.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.40 | $225.26 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.39 | $140.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.8% | +92.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.7 | 58.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 372K | 879K |
ITT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CMCO and ITT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CMCO as "Buy" and ITT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.6% upside for CMCO (target: $20) vs 10.6% for ITT (target: $230). For income investors, CMCO offers the higher dividend yield at 1.77% vs ITT's 0.67%.
| Metric | CMCOColumbus McKinnon… | ITTITT Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.00 | $229.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.28 | $1.39 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | +2.8% |
Evenly matched — CMCO and ITT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
ITT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CMCO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallITT Inc. (ITT)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CMCO vs ITT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMCO or ITT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ITT Inc.
(ITT) is the stronger pick with 8. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 0% for Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO). ITT Inc. (ITT) offers the better valuation at 34. 0x trailing P/E (27. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CMCO or ITT?
On forward P/E, Columbus McKinnon Corporation is actually cheaper at 7.
4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CMCO or ITT?
Over the past 5 years, ITT Inc.
(ITT) delivered a total return of +115. 8%, compared to -67. 2% for Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ITT returned +531. 3% versus CMCO's +22. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CMCO or ITT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ITT Inc.
(ITT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 23β versus Columbus McKinnon Corporation's 2. 32β — meaning CMCO is approximately 89% more volatile than ITT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ITT Inc. (ITT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 61% for Columbus McKinnon Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CMCO or ITT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ITT Inc.
(ITT) is pulling ahead at 8. 5% versus -5. 0% for Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ITT Inc. grew EPS -3. 0% year-over-year, compared to -111. 2% for Columbus McKinnon Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ITT leads at 9. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CMCO or ITT?
ITT Inc.
(ITT) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 4% net margin versus -0. 5% for Columbus McKinnon Corporation — meaning it keeps 12. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ITT leads at 17. 4% versus 5. 7% for CMCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ITT leads at 35. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CMCO or ITT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) trades at 7.
4x forward P/E versus 27. 1x for ITT Inc. — 19. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CMCO: 26. 6% to $20. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CMCO or ITT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) offers the highest yield at 1. 8%, versus 0. 7% for ITT Inc. (ITT).
09Is CMCO or ITT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ITT Inc.
(ITT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 23), 0. 7% yield, +531. 3% 10Y return). Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) carries a higher beta of 2. 32 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ITT: +531. 3%, CMCO: +22. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CMCO and ITT?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CMCO: 10.5% · ITT: 32.7%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.