Industrial Materials
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CMP vs NEM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gold
CMP vs NEM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Gold |
| Market Cap | $1.10B | $127.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.29B | $17.23B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $5.26B |
| Gross Margin | 17.5% | 52.1% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 49.3% |
| Forward P/E | 32.7x | 11.0x |
| Total Debt | $848M | $474M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $60M | $7.65B |
CMP vs NEM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compass Minerals In… (CMP) | 100 | 54.8 | -45.2% |
| Newmont Corporation (NEM) | 100 | 196.9 | +96.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CMP vs NEM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, CMP is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
NEM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.75, yield 0.9%
- Rev growth 19.1%, EPS growth 124.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
- 271.4% 10Y total return vs CMP's -42.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.1% revenue growth vs CMP's 11.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 32.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.5% margin vs CMP's 0.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.75 vs CMP's 1.54, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +112.6% vs CMP's +89.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.4% ROA vs CMP's 0.5%, ROIC 24.9% vs 1.7% |
CMP vs NEM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CMP vs NEM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NEM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NEM is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.2B annually — 13.3x CMP's $1.3B. NEM is the more profitable business, keeping 30.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMP's 0.5%. On growth, CMP holds the edge at -8.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $17.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $170M | $12.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $5.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $100M | $12.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.5% | +52.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +49.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | +30.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.8% | +75.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.4% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +139.0% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CMP and NEM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, NEM's 9.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CMP's 14.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $127.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $120.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.81x | 17.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 32.67x | 11.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.40x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.73x | 9.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.89x | 5.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.71x | 3.75x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.63x | 17.47x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NEM leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NEM delivers a 15.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $3 for CMP. NEM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMP's 3.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NEM scores 9/9 vs CMP's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.8% | +15.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +9.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.7% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.9% | +20.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.62x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $788M | -$7.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $60M | $7.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $848M | $474M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.73x | 50.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NEM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NEM five years ago would be worth $18,360 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,188 for CMP. Over the past 12 months, NEM leads with a +112.6% total return vs CMP's +89.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NEM at 34.9% vs CMP's -4.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.8% | +14.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +89.0% | +112.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.7% | +145.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.1% | +83.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.1% | +271.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.4% | +34.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CMP and NEM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NEM is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMP's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CMP currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs NEM's 85.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.54x | 0.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.22 | $134.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.53 | $48.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.9% | +85.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.8 | 46.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 538K | 9.2M |
Analyst Outlook
NEM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CMP as "Buy" and NEM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.5% upside for NEM (target: $138) vs -10.3% for CMP (target: $24). NEM is the only dividend payer here at 0.87% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.67 | $137.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.8% |
NEM leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
CMP vs NEM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMP or NEM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the stronger pick with 19.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 3% for Compass Minerals International, Inc. (CMP). Newmont Corporation (NEM) offers the better valuation at 18. 0x trailing P/E (11. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Compass Minerals International, Inc. (CMP) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CMP or NEM?
On forward P/E, Newmont Corporation is actually cheaper at 11.
0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CMP or NEM?
Over the past 5 years, Newmont Corporation (NEM) delivered a total return of +83.
6%, compared to -58. 1% for Compass Minerals International, Inc. (CMP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NEM returned +271. 4% versus CMP's -42. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CMP or NEM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
75β versus Compass Minerals International, Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning CMP is approximately 105% more volatile than NEM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Newmont Corporation (NEM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 4% for Compass Minerals International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CMP or NEM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Newmont Corporation (NEM) is pulling ahead at 19.
1% versus 11. 3% for Compass Minerals International, Inc. (CMP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Newmont Corporation grew EPS 124. 1% year-over-year, compared to 61. 7% for Compass Minerals International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NEM leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CMP or NEM?
Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
1% net margin versus -6. 4% for Compass Minerals International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NEM leads at 46. 9% versus 2. 0% for CMP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NEM leads at 49. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CMP or NEM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Newmont Corporation (NEM) trades at 11.
0x forward P/E versus 32. 7x for Compass Minerals International, Inc. — 21. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NEM: 19. 5% to $137. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CMP or NEM?
In this comparison, NEM (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. CMP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CMP or NEM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
75), 0. 9% yield, +271. 4% 10Y return). Compass Minerals International, Inc. (CMP) carries a higher beta of 1. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NEM: +271. 4%, CMP: -42. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CMP and NEM?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CMP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NEM is a mid-cap high-growth stock. NEM pays a dividend while CMP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.