CMPO
CompoSecure, Inc.
Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Market Cap$2.06B
5Y Perf.+100.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CMPO vs FORM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
FORM
FormFactor, Inc.
Semiconductors
Market Cap$11.28B
5Y Perf.+141.2%
CMPO vs FORM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CMPO | FORM |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $2.06B | $11.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $161M | $840M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-217M | $68M |
| Gross Margin | 50.6% | 42.1% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 12.7% |
| Forward P/E | 15.2x | 66.5x |
| Total Debt | $202M | $45M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $77M | $103M |
CMPO vs FORM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CMPO
FORM
| Stock | Nov 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CompoSecure, Inc. (CMPO) | 100 | 200.9 | +100.9% |
| FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) | 100 | 241.2 | +141.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CMPO vs FORM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CMPO leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. FormFactor, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CMPO
CompoSecure, Inc.
The Income Pick
CMPO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.47, yield 1.2%
- Rev growth 7.7%, EPS growth -325.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.47, current ratio 2.28x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
FORM
FormFactor, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
FORM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 19.5% 10Y total return vs CMPO's 104.7%
- 8.1% margin vs CMPO's -134.8%
- +387.8% vs CMPO's +45.6%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CMPO | 7.7% revenue growth vs FORM's 2.8% |
| Value | CMPO | Lower P/E (15.2x vs 66.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | FORM | 8.1% margin vs CMPO's -134.8% |
| Stability / Safety | CMPO | Beta 1.47 vs FORM's 2.02 |
| Dividends | CMPO | 1.2% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | FORM | +387.8% vs CMPO's +45.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FORM | 5.6% ROA vs CMPO's -54.5%, ROIC 5.4% vs 205.9% |
CMPO vs FORM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
CMPO vs FORM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLFORMLAGGINGCMPO
CMPOCompoSecure, Inc.
1leads
FORMFormFactor, Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CMPOMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
FORM4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CMPO5/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
FORM5/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
FORM6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FORM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FORM is the larger business by revenue, generating $840M annually — 5.2x CMPO's $161M. FORM is the more profitable business, keeping 8.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMPO's -134.8%. On growth, FORM holds the edge at +32.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CMPOCompoSecure, Inc. | FORMFormFactor, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $161M | $840M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$186M | $152M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$217M | $68M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $23M | -$5M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.6% | +42.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | +12.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -134.8% | +8.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | -0.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +32.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -43.6% | +2.2% |
FORM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CMPO leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CMPO's 18.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FORM's 100.9x.
| Metric | CMPOCompoSecure, Inc. | FORMFormFactor, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $11.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.2B | $11.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.53x | 209.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.17x | 66.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.73x | 100.94x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.91x | 14.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 10.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.89x | 960.69x |
CMPO leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FORM leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FORM scores 4/9 vs CMPO's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | CMPOCompoSecure, Inc. | FORMFormFactor, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +6.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -54.5% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.1% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +38.6% | +6.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $124M | -$58M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $77M | $103M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $202M | $45M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -36.42x | 252.69x |
FORM leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FORM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FORM five years ago would be worth $37,395 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20,026 for CMPO. Over the past 12 months, FORM leads with a +387.8% total return vs CMPO's +45.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FORM at 72.9% vs CMPO's 40.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CMPOCompoSecure, Inc. | FORMFormFactor, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.6% | +144.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.6% | +387.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +179.4% | +417.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +100.3% | +273.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.7% | +1952.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +40.8% | +72.9% |
FORM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CMPO and FORM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CMPO is the less volatile stock with a 1.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FORM's 2.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FORM currently trades 90.9% from its 52-week high vs CMPO's 61.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CMPOCompoSecure, Inc. | FORMFormFactor, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.47x | 2.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.78 | $159.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.16 | $26.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.7% | +90.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.3 | 66.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.3M | 1.6M |
Evenly matched — CMPO and FORM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CMPO as "Buy" and FORM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 51.4% upside for CMPO (target: $25) vs -14.7% for FORM (target: $123). CMPO is the only dividend payer here at 1.23% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | CMPOCompoSecure, Inc. | FORMFormFactor, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.00 | $123.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
FORM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CMPO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallFormFactor, Inc. (FORM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CMPO vs FORM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMPO or FORM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CompoSecure, Inc.
(CMPO) is the stronger pick with 7. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 8% for FormFactor, Inc. (FORM). FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) offers the better valuation at 209. 7x trailing P/E (66. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CompoSecure, Inc. (CMPO) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CMPO or FORM?
On forward P/E, CompoSecure, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 15. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CMPO or FORM?
Over the past 5 years, FormFactor, Inc.
(FORM) delivered a total return of +273. 9%, compared to +100. 3% for CompoSecure, Inc. (CMPO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FORM returned +1952% versus CMPO's +104. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CMPO or FORM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CompoSecure, Inc.
(CMPO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 47β versus FormFactor, Inc. 's 2. 02β — meaning FORM is approximately 38% more volatile than CMPO relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — CMPO or FORM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CompoSecure, Inc.
(CMPO) is pulling ahead at 7. 7% versus 2. 8% for FormFactor, Inc. (FORM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FormFactor, Inc. grew EPS -22. 5% year-over-year, compared to -325. 9% for CompoSecure, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CMPO leads at 16. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CMPO or FORM?
FormFactor, Inc.
(FORM) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 9% net margin versus -12. 8% for CompoSecure, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CMPO leads at 25. 6% versus 8. 2% for FORM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CMPO leads at 52. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CMPO or FORM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, CompoSecure, Inc.
(CMPO) trades at 15. 2x forward P/E versus 66. 5x for FormFactor, Inc. — 51. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CMPO: 51. 4% to $25. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CMPO or FORM?
In this comparison, CMPO (1.
2% yield) pays a dividend. FORM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CMPO or FORM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CompoSecure, Inc.
(CMPO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 2% yield, +104. 7% 10Y return). FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CMPO: +104. 7%, FORM: +1952%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CMPO and FORM?
These companies operate in different sectors (CMPO (Industrials) and FORM (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
CMPO pays a dividend while FORM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CMPO: -100.0% · FORM: 32.0%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.