Medical - Healthcare Plans
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CNC vs HUM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Plans
CNC vs HUM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Plans | Medical - Healthcare Plans |
| Market Cap | $27.31B | $29.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $198.10B | $137.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6.44B | $1.13B |
| Gross Margin | 14.9% | 14.0% |
| Operating Margin | -3.7% | 1.0% |
| Forward P/E | 16.4x | 27.6x |
| Total Debt | $18.78B | $12.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17.89B | $4.20B |
CNC vs HUM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centene Corporation (CNC) | 100 | 83.5 | -16.5% |
| Humana Inc. (HUM) | 100 | 60.0 | -40.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CNC vs HUM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CNC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.39
- Rev growth 19.4%, EPS growth -315.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.5%
- 85.1% 10Y total return vs HUM's 59.9%
HUM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- Combined ratio 1.0 vs CNC's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting)
- 1.4% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
- -0.8% vs CNC's -7.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.4% revenue growth vs HUM's 10.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.4x vs 27.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 1.0 vs CNC's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs HUM's 0.56 | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -0.8% vs CNC's -7.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.2% ROA vs CNC's -7.9%, ROIC 4.1% vs -21.6% |
CNC vs HUM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CNC vs HUM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CNC and HUM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CNC and HUM operate at a comparable scale, with $198.1B and $137.2B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 0.8% (HUM) to -3.3% (CNC). On growth, HUM holds the edge at +23.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $198.1B | $137.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5.9B | $2.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6.4B | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6.3B | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +14.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | +1.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | +0.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | +0.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.1% | +23.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.3% | -4.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CNC leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $27.3B | $29.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $28.2B | $38.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.06x | 25.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.40x | 27.59x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 16.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.14x | 0.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.35x | 1.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.32x | 78.87x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HUM leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HUM delivers a 6.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-29 for CNC. HUM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.73x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNC's 0.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CNC scores 6/9 vs HUM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -28.6% | +6.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.9% | +2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -21.6% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -14.6% | +4.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.94x | 0.73x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $889M | $8.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17.9B | $4.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18.8B | $12.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.03x | 3.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CNC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CNC five years ago would be worth $8,485 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,650 for HUM. Over the past 12 months, HUM leads with a -0.8% total return vs CNC's -7.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CNC at -6.8% vs HUM's -21.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.4% | -6.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.3% | -0.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.0% | -52.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.1% | -43.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +85.1% | +59.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.8% | -21.7% |
Risk & Volatility
CNC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNC is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HUM's 0.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CNC currently trades 86.2% from its 52-week high vs HUM's 78.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.39x | 0.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $64.15 | $315.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.08 | $163.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.2% | +78.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 80.9 | 73.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.8M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
CNC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CNC as "Buy" and HUM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -0.1% upside for HUM (target: $246) vs -7.8% for CNC (target: $51). HUM is the only dividend payer here at 1.44% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $51.00 | $246.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 43 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.56 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +0.5% |
CNC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). HUM leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
CNC vs HUM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CNC or HUM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Centene Corporation (CNC) is the stronger pick with 19.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 1% for Humana Inc. (HUM). Humana Inc. (HUM) offers the better valuation at 25. 0x trailing P/E (27. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Centene Corporation (CNC) a "Buy" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CNC or HUM?
On forward P/E, Centene Corporation is actually cheaper at 16.
4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CNC or HUM?
Over the past 5 years, Centene Corporation (CNC) delivered a total return of -15.
1%, compared to -43. 5% for Humana Inc. (HUM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CNC returned +85. 1% versus HUM's +59. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CNC or HUM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Centene Corporation (CNC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
39β versus Humana Inc. 's 0. 56β — meaning HUM is approximately 44% more volatile than CNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Humana Inc. (HUM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 73% versus 94% for Centene Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CNC or HUM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Centene Corporation (CNC) is pulling ahead at 19.
4% versus 10. 1% for Humana Inc. (HUM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Humana Inc. grew EPS -1. 4% year-over-year, compared to -315. 8% for Centene Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, HUM leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CNC or HUM?
Humana Inc.
(HUM) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 9% net margin versus -3. 4% for Centene Corporation — meaning it keeps 0. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HUM leads at 1. 1% versus -3. 9% for CNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUM leads at 14. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CNC or HUM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Centene Corporation (CNC) trades at 16.
4x forward P/E versus 27. 6x for Humana Inc. — 11. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HUM: -0. 1% to $246. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CNC or HUM?
In this comparison, HUM (1.
4% yield) pays a dividend. CNC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CNC or HUM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Humana Inc.
(HUM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), 1. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HUM: +59. 9%, CNC: +85. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CNC and HUM?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CNC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HUM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. HUM pays a dividend while CNC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.