CNDT vs UIS

For growth investors, Unisys Corporation (UIS) is the stronger pick with -2.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Conduent Incorporated (CNDT). Analysts rate Conduent Incorporated (CNDT) a "Hold" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Conduent Incorporated (CNDT) delivered a total return of -76.

1%, compared to -86. 5% for Unisys Corporation (UIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UIS returned -55. 8% versus CNDT's -89. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Conduent Incorporated (CNDT) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

72β versus Unisys Corporation's 2. 34β — meaning UIS is approximately 37% more volatile than CNDT relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Unisys Corporation (UIS) is pulling ahead at -2.

9% versus -9. 4% for Conduent Incorporated (CNDT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Unisys Corporation grew EPS -71. 0% year-over-year, compared to -151. 1% for Conduent Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, UIS leads at -0. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Conduent Incorporated (CNDT) is the more profitable company, earning -5.

6% net margin versus -17. 4% for Unisys Corporation — meaning it keeps -5. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UIS leads at 6. 8% versus 4. 5% for CNDT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UIS leads at 28. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, CNDT (3.

6% yield) pays a dividend. UIS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Conduent Incorporated (CNDT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (3.

6% yield). Unisys Corporation (UIS) carries a higher beta of 2. 34 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNDT: -89. 1%, UIS: -55. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CNDT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; UIS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CNDT pays a dividend while UIS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.