Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
CNTA logo
CNTA
KYMR logo
KYMR
IMVT logo
IMVT
ARQT logo
ARQT
PRAX logo
PRAX
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CNTA vs KYMR vs IMVT vs ARQT vs PRAX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CNTA
Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • GB
Market Cap$6.15B
5Y Perf.+82.9%
KYMR
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.77B
5Y Perf.+72.5%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.75B
5Y Perf.+116.9%
ARQT
Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.08B
5Y Perf.-6.7%
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.16B
5Y Perf.-15.6%

CNTA vs KYMR vs IMVT vs ARQT vs PRAX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CNTA logoCNTA
KYMR logoKYMR
IMVT logoIMVT
ARQT logoARQT
PRAX logoPRAX
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$6.15B$6.77B$6.75B$3.08B$7.16B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$51M$0.00$416M$0.00
Net Income (TTM)$-251M$-315M$-506M$-2M$-327M
Gross Margin100.0%33.2%90.9%
Operating Margin-13.8%-7.0%0.8%
Forward P/E123.5x
Total Debt$8M$82M$72K$6M$110K
Cash & Equiv.$61M$357M$902M$43M$357M

CNTA vs KYMR vs IMVT vs ARQT vs PRAXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CNTA
KYMR
IMVT
ARQT
PRAX
StockMay 21Jun 26Return
Centessa Pharmaceut… (CNTA)100182.9+82.9%
Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR)100172.5+72.5%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)100216.9+116.9%
Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT)10093.3-6.7%
Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX)10084.4-15.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CNTA vs KYMR vs IMVT vs ARQT vs PRAX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ARQT leads in 2 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and operational efficiency and capital deployment. Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. IMVT and PRAX also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇ARQT emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
CNTA
Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, CNTA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
KYMR
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
The Income Pick

KYMR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • beta 0.90
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 10.47x
  • Beta 0.90, current ratio 10.47x
  • Beta 0.90 vs IMVT's 1.67
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

IMVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 230.5% 10Y total return vs KYMR's 149.4%
  • 2.6% margin vs CNTA's -13.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
ARQT
Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
The Growth Play

ARQT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 91.3%, EPS growth 88.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 367.3%
  • 91.3% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
  • -0.6% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2%
Best for: growth exposure
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +456.0% vs KYMR's +71.4%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthARQT logoARQT91.3% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
Quality / MarginsIMVT logoIMVT2.6% margin vs CNTA's -13.2%
Stability / SafetyKYMR logoKYMRBeta 0.90 vs IMVT's 1.67
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PRAX logoPRAX+456.0% vs KYMR's +71.4%
Efficiency (ROA)ARQT logoARQT-0.6% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2%

CNTA vs KYMR vs IMVT vs ARQT vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CNTACentessa Pharmaceuticals plc
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$15M
KYMRKymera Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ARQTArcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
FY 2023
Other Revenue
51.0%$30M
Product
49.0%$29M
PRAXPraxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
FY 2024
License
76.8%$9M
Upfront Payment
23.2%$3M

CNTA vs KYMR vs IMVT vs ARQT vs PRAX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLARQTLAGGINGIMVT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ARQT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

ARQT and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $416M and $0 in trailing revenue. ARQT is the more profitable business, keeping -0.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNTA's -13.2%. On growth, ARQT holds the edge at +60.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCNTA logoCNTACentessa Pharmace…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$51M$0$416M$0
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$257M-$352M-$532M$6M-$357M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$251M-$315M-$506M-$2M-$327M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$209M-$244M-$407M$27M-$283M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+100.0%+33.2%+90.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-13.8%-7.0%+0.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-13.2%-6.1%-0.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-12.9%-4.7%+6.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%+55.5%+60.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-160.0%+13.4%-14.1%+55.0%+2.7%
ARQT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ARQT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricCNTA logoCNTACentessa Pharmace…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
Market CapShares × price$6.2B$6.8B$6.8B$3.1B$7.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$6.1B$6.5B$5.8B$3.0B$6.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-27.24x-22.48x-11.87x-189.15x-18.40x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.123.51x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue410.24x172.78x8.18x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share10.24x4.43x7.04x16.51x6.36x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
ARQT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ARQT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

ARQT delivers a -1.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-1 in annual profit, vs $-68 for IMVT. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KYMR's 0.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CNTA scores 5/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricCNTA logoCNTACentessa Pharmace…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-60.4%-25.0%-68.2%-1.4%-43.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-44.2%-22.3%-62.2%-0.6%-40.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-51.2%-24.9%-5.2%-65.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-35.7%-27.2%-68.3%-4.3%-49.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–954243
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.05x0.00x0.03x0.00x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$54M-$275M-$902M-$37M-$357M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$61M$357M$902M$43M$357M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$8M$82M$72,000$6M$110,000
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-23.48x-2119.53x2.08x
ARQT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $30,700 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,237 for PRAX. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +456.0% total return vs KYMR's +71.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 158.5% vs IMVT's 14.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCNTA logoCNTACentessa Pharmace…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+67.9%+14.0%+26.9%-15.2%-13.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+218.4%+71.4%+103.6%+79.1%+456.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+757.1%+230.0%+51.6%+140.8%+1628.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+83.2%+64.1%+207.0%-13.3%-17.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+82.9%+149.4%+230.5%+12.8%-40.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+104.7%+48.9%+14.9%+34.0%+158.5%
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CNTA and KYMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KYMR is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMVT's 1.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CNTA currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs PRAX's 67.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCNTA logoCNTACentessa Pharmace…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.26x0.90x1.67x1.49x1.55x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$40.25$103.00$36.27$31.77$366.52
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$11.77$36.65$14.32$12.72$37.19
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.8%+80.5%+90.6%+77.4%+67.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10060.847.751.959.928.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.7M493K1.9M1.5M394K
Evenly matched — CNTA and KYMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: CNTA as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", ARQT as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 140.3% upside for PRAX (target: $596) vs -0.7% for CNTA (target: $40).

MetricCNTA logoCNTACentessa Pharmace…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$39.50$119.93$43.67$34.00$595.93
# AnalystsCovering analysts1426231216
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ARQT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallArcutis Biotherapeutics, In… (ARQT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CNTA vs KYMR vs IMVT vs ARQT vs PRAX: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CNTA or KYMR or IMVT or ARQT or PRAX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

(ARQT) is the stronger pick with 91. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Analysts rate Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc (CNTA) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — CNTA or KYMR or IMVT or ARQT or PRAX?

Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) delivered a total return of +207. 0%, compared to -17. 6% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +230. 5% versus PRAX's -40. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — CNTA or KYMR or IMVT or ARQT or PRAX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.

(KYMR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus Immunovant, Inc. 's 1. 67β — meaning IMVT is approximately 87% more volatile than KYMR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 5% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — CNTA or KYMR or IMVT or ARQT or PRAX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

(ARQT) is pulling ahead at 91. 3% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 88. 8% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARQT leads at 367. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — CNTA or KYMR or IMVT or ARQT or PRAX?

Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -1316. 9% for Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IMVT leads at 0. 0% versus -1384. 6% for CNTA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CNTA leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is CNTA or KYMR or IMVT or ARQT or PRAX more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 140.

3% to $595. 93.

07

Which pays a better dividend — CNTA or KYMR or IMVT or ARQT or PRAX?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is CNTA or KYMR or IMVT or ARQT or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.

(KYMR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90), +149. 4% 10Y return). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KYMR: +149. 4%, PRAX: -40. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between CNTA and KYMR and IMVT and ARQT and PRAX?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CNTA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.