Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CNTY vs CZR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
CNTY vs CZR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $44M | $5.66B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $573M | $11.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-108M | $-485M |
| Gross Margin | 38.2% | 43.9% |
| Operating Margin | 0.8% | 17.8% |
| Total Debt | $1.06B | $26.34B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $99M | $887M |
CNTY vs CZR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Century Casinos, In… (CNTY) | 100 | 26.9 | -73.1% |
| Caesars Entertainme… (CZR) | 100 | 243.9 | +143.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CNTY vs CZR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CNTY is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.95
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth -350.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, current ratio 1.58x
CZR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 302.6% 10Y total return vs CNTY's -77.3%
- -4.2% margin vs CNTY's -18.9%
- +2.5% vs CNTY's +2.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.7% revenue growth vs CZR's 2.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | -4.2% margin vs CNTY's -18.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs CZR's 1.27 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +2.5% vs CNTY's +2.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.5% ROA vs CNTY's -9.0%, ROIC 5.4% vs 0.3% |
CNTY vs CZR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CNTY vs CZR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CZR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CZR is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 20.2x CNTY's $573M. CZR is the more profitable business, keeping -4.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNTY's -18.9%. On growth, CZR holds the edge at +2.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $573M | $11.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $61M | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$108M | -$485M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$28M | $538M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.2% | +43.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | +17.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -18.9% | -4.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.9% | +4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.3% | +2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -34.6% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CNTY and CZR each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CZR's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CNTY's 16.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $44M | $5.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $31.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.35x | -11.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.74x | 8.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.08x | 0.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.55x | 1.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CZR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CZR delivers a -12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-13 in annual profit, vs $-2 for CNTY. CZR carries lower financial leverage with a 7.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNTY's 12.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CZR scores 5/9 vs CNTY's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | -12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.0% | -1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.3% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.4% | +7.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 12.96x | 7.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $964M | $25.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $99M | $887M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $26.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.26x | 0.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZR five years ago would be worth $2,627 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,160 for CNTY. Over the past 12 months, CZR leads with a +2.5% total return vs CNTY's +2.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZR at -15.0% vs CNTY's -40.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.5% | +17.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.1% | +2.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.3% | -38.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.4% | -73.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.3% | +302.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -40.8% | -15.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CNTY and CZR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNTY is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CZR's 1.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CZR currently trades 88.0% from its 52-week high vs CNTY's 51.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 1.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.85 | $31.58 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.23 | $17.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.6% | +88.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.0 | 54.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 55K | 4.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $30.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +4.0% |
CZR leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
CNTY vs CZR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CNTY or CZR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Century Casinos, Inc.
(CNTY) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 1% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR). Analysts rate Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CNTY or CZR?
Over the past 5 years, Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
(CZR) delivered a total return of -73. 7%, compared to -88. 4% for Century Casinos, Inc. (CNTY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZR returned +302. 6% versus CNTY's -77. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CNTY or CZR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Century Casinos, Inc.
(CNTY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus Caesars Entertainment, Inc. 's 1. 27β — meaning CZR is approximately 33% more volatile than CNTY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 13% for Century Casinos, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CNTY or CZR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Century Casinos, Inc.
(CNTY) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus 2. 1% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Caesars Entertainment, Inc. grew EPS -87. 6% year-over-year, compared to -350. 5% for Century Casinos, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CNTY leads at 14. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CNTY or CZR?
Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
(CZR) is the more profitable company, earning -4. 4% net margin versus -22. 3% for Century Casinos, Inc. — meaning it keeps -4. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CZR leads at 18. 1% versus 0. 7% for CNTY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CNTY leads at 42. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CNTY or CZR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is CNTY or CZR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Century Casinos, Inc.
(CNTY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNTY: -77. 3%, CZR: +302. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CNTY and CZR?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.