Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
COHU vs FORM vs ACLS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
COHU vs FORM vs ACLS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $2.28B | $11.30B | $4.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $481M | $840M | $839M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-56M | $68M | $120M |
| Gross Margin | 25.7% | 42.1% | 44.9% |
| Operating Margin | -10.6% | 12.7% | 14.2% |
| Forward P/E | 91.0x | 66.6x | 38.3x |
| Total Debt | $359M | $45M | $42M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $227M | $103M | $145M |
COHU vs FORM vs ACLS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohu, Inc. (COHU) | 100 | 321.7 | +221.7% |
| FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) | 100 | 576.1 | +476.1% |
| Axcelis Technologie… (ACLS) | 100 | 518.1 | +418.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: COHU vs FORM vs ACLS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
COHU is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 12.7%, EPS growth -6.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -17.7%
- 12.7% revenue growth vs ACLS's -17.6%
FORM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 20.2% 10Y total return vs ACLS's 12.6%
- +386.4% vs ACLS's +168.2%
ACLS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.00
- Lower volatility, beta 2.00, Low D/E 4.1%, current ratio 4.77x
- Beta 2.00, current ratio 4.77x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.7% revenue growth vs ACLS's -17.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (38.3x vs 66.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.3% margin vs COHU's -11.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.00 vs COHU's 2.13, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +386.4% vs ACLS's +168.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.8% ROA vs COHU's -4.9%, ROIC 9.6% vs -5.7% |
COHU vs FORM vs ACLS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
COHU vs FORM vs ACLS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACLS leads in 2 of 6 categories
FORM leads 1 • COHU leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FORM is the larger business by revenue, generating $840M annually — 1.7x COHU's $481M. ACLS is the more profitable business, keeping 14.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COHU's -11.5%. On growth, FORM holds the edge at +32.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $481M | $840M | $839M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | $152M | $137M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$56M | $68M | $120M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $32M | -$5M | $107M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | +42.1% | +44.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.6% | +12.7% | +14.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.5% | +8.1% | +14.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | -0.6% | +12.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.3% | +32.0% | -5.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +60.6% | +2.2% | -28.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — COHU and ACLS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 36.8x trailing earnings, ACLS trades at a 83% valuation discount to FORM's 210.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACLS's 32.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FORM's 101.2x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $11.3B | $4.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.4B | $11.2B | $4.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -30.47x | 210.14x | 36.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 91.04x | 66.63x | 38.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.74x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 101.17x | 32.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.03x | 14.40x | 5.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.88x | 10.97x | 4.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 212.08x | 962.81x | 42.30x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACLS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACLS delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-7 for COHU. ACLS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COHU's 0.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACLS scores 5/9 vs FORM's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.8% | +6.7% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.9% | +5.6% | +8.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.7% | +5.4% | +9.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.9% | +6.1% | +10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 0.04x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $132M | -$58M | -$103M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $227M | $103M | $145M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $359M | $45M | $42M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -168.82x | 252.69x | 33.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FORM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FORM five years ago would be worth $38,462 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,923 for COHU. Over the past 12 months, FORM leads with a +386.4% total return vs ACLS's +168.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FORM at 73.0% vs ACLS's 5.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +96.9% | +145.0% | +62.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +195.1% | +386.4% | +168.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.6% | +418.0% | +16.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.2% | +284.6% | +249.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +339.2% | +2019.9% | +1264.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.0% | +73.0% | +5.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — COHU and ACLS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACLS is the less volatile stock with a 2.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COHU's 2.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. COHU currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs FORM's 91.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.13x | 2.02x | 2.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $49.45 | $159.09 | $147.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.34 | $26.08 | $50.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.0% | +91.1% | +94.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.6 | 56.8 | 75.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 927K | 1.6M | 694K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: COHU as "Buy", FORM as "Hold", ACLS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2.7% upside for COHU (target: $50) vs -14.9% for FORM (target: $123).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.75 | $123.38 | $128.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 19 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.2% | +2.7% |
ACLS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FORM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
COHU vs FORM vs ACLS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is COHU or FORM or ACLS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cohu, Inc.
(COHU) is the stronger pick with 12. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 6% for Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS). Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) offers the better valuation at 36. 8x trailing P/E (38. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cohu, Inc. (COHU) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — COHU or FORM or ACLS?
On trailing P/E, Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
(ACLS) is the cheapest at 36. 8x versus FormFactor, Inc. at 210. 1x. On forward P/E, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 38. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — COHU or FORM or ACLS?
Over the past 5 years, FormFactor, Inc.
(FORM) delivered a total return of +284. 6%, compared to +29. 2% for Cohu, Inc. (COHU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FORM returned +20. 2% versus COHU's +339. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — COHU or FORM or ACLS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
(ACLS) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 00β versus Cohu, Inc. 's 2. 13β — meaning COHU is approximately 7% more volatile than ACLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 46% for Cohu, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — COHU or FORM or ACLS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cohu, Inc.
(COHU) is pulling ahead at 12. 7% versus -17. 6% for Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cohu, Inc. grew EPS -6. 7% year-over-year, compared to -38. 2% for Axcelis Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FORM leads at 1. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — COHU or FORM or ACLS?
Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
(ACLS) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 3% net margin versus -16. 4% for Cohu, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACLS leads at 14. 2% versus -13. 3% for COHU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACLS leads at 44. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is COHU or FORM or ACLS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
(ACLS) trades at 38. 3x forward P/E versus 91. 0x for Cohu, Inc. — 52. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COHU: 2. 7% to $49. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — COHU or FORM or ACLS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is COHU or FORM or ACLS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
(ACLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1264% 10Y return). FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACLS: +1264%, FORM: +20. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between COHU and FORM and ACLS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.