COHU vs ICHR vs MKSI vs CAMT

For growth investors, Camtek Ltd.

(CAMT) is the stronger pick with 36. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 6% for MKS Inc. (MKSI). MKS Inc. (MKSI) offers the better valuation at 68. 8x trailing P/E (30. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cohu, Inc. (COHU) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, MKS Inc.

(MKSI) is the cheapest at 68. 8x versus Camtek Ltd. at 79. 8x. On forward P/E, MKS Inc. is actually cheaper at 30. 4x.

Over the past 5 years, Camtek Ltd.

(CAMT) delivered a total return of +526. 7%, compared to +22. 2% for Cohu, Inc. (COHU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAMT returned +106. 7% versus COHU's +330. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Camtek Ltd.

(CAMT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 99β versus Ichor Holdings, Ltd. 's 3. 93β — meaning ICHR is approximately 97% more volatile than CAMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Camtek Ltd.

(CAMT) is pulling ahead at 36. 1% versus 9. 6% for MKS Inc. (MKSI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MKS Inc. grew EPS 55. 5% year-over-year, compared to -140. 6% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CAMT leads at 16. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Camtek Ltd.

(CAMT) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 6% net margin versus -16. 4% for Cohu, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CAMT leads at 25. 2% versus -13. 3% for COHU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CAMT leads at 48. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, MKS Inc.

(MKSI) trades at 30. 4x forward P/E versus 89. 2x for Cohu, Inc. — 58. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COHU: 4. 8% to $49. 75.

In this comparison, CAMT (0.

6% yield), MKSI (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. COHU, ICHR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Camtek Ltd.

(CAMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 6% yield, +106. 7% 10Y return). Cohu, Inc. (COHU) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAMT: +106. 7%, COHU: +330. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: COHU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ICHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MKSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CAMT is a small-cap high-growth stock. CAMT pays a dividend while COHU, ICHR, MKSI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.