COHU
Cohu, Inc.
Semiconductors
Market Cap$2.33B
5Y Perf.+229.5%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
COHU vs KLIC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
KLIC
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
Semiconductors
Market Cap$4.91B
5Y Perf.+319.4%
COHU vs KLIC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | COHU | KLIC |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $2.33B | $4.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $481M | $768M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-56M | $55M |
| Gross Margin | 25.7% | 48.0% |
| Operating Margin | -10.6% | 6.7% |
| Forward P/E | 93.2x | 35.7x |
| Total Debt | $359M | $39M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $227M | $216M |
COHU vs KLIC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
COHU
KLIC
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohu, Inc. (COHU) | 100 | 329.5 | +229.5% |
| Kulicke and Soffa I… (KLIC) | 100 | 419.4 | +319.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: COHU vs KLIC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: KLIC leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Cohu, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
COHU
Cohu, Inc.
The Growth Play
COHU is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 12.7%, EPS growth -6.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -17.7%
- 12.7% revenue growth vs KLIC's -7.4%
- +217.9% vs KLIC's +198.0%
Best for: growth exposure
KLIC
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
The Income Pick
KLIC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.87, yield 1.1%
- 7.8% 10Y total return vs COHU's 345.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.87, Low D/E 4.7%, current ratio 4.79x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | COHU | 12.7% revenue growth vs KLIC's -7.4% |
| Value | KLIC | Lower P/E (35.7x vs 93.2x) |
| Quality / Margins | KLIC | 7.2% margin vs COHU's -11.5% |
| Stability / Safety | KLIC | Beta 1.87 vs COHU's 2.13, lower leverage |
| Dividends | KLIC | 1.1% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | COHU | +217.9% vs KLIC's +198.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | KLIC | 4.9% ROA vs COHU's -4.9%, ROIC -0.3% vs -5.7% |
COHU vs KLIC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2014
FY 2024
COHU vs KLIC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLKLICLAGGINGCOHU
COHUCohu, Inc.
1leads
KLICKulicke and Soffa Ind…
5leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs COHUMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
KLIC5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
COHU3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
KLIC9/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
KLIC4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
KLIC2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
KLIC1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KLIC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KLIC is the larger business by revenue, generating $768M annually — 1.6x COHU's $481M. KLIC is the more profitable business, keeping 7.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COHU's -11.5%. On growth, KLIC holds the edge at +49.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | COHUCohu, Inc. | KLICKulicke and Soffa… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $481M | $768M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | $59M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$56M | $55M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $32M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | +48.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.6% | +6.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.5% | +7.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | +1.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.3% | +49.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +60.6% | +141.5% |
KLIC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
COHU leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | COHUCohu, Inc. | KLICKulicke and Soffa… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $4.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.5B | $4.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -31.21x | 9999.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 93.24x | 35.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 320.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.15x | 7.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.95x | 6.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 217.20x | 50.93x |
COHU leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KLIC leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KLIC delivers a 6.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-7 for COHU. KLIC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COHU's 0.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KLIC scores 7/9 vs COHU's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | COHUCohu, Inc. | KLICKulicke and Soffa… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.8% | +6.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.9% | +4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.7% | -0.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.9% | -0.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $132M | -$177M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $227M | $216M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $359M | $39M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -168.82x | 4872.17x |
KLIC leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KLIC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KLIC five years ago would be worth $20,118 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,141 for COHU. Over the past 12 months, COHU leads with a +217.9% total return vs KLIC's +198.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KLIC at 27.2% vs COHU's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | COHUCohu, Inc. | KLICKulicke and Soffa… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +101.6% | +94.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +217.9% | +198.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.0% | +105.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.4% | +101.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +345.2% | +775.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.7% | +27.2% |
KLIC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KLIC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KLIC is the less volatile stock with a 1.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COHU's 2.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | COHUCohu, Inc. | KLICKulicke and Soffa… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.13x | 1.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.68 | $95.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.34 | $29.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.9% | +98.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.7 | 74.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 935K | 575K |
KLIC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
KLIC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates COHU as "Buy" and KLIC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 0.3% upside for COHU (target: $50) vs -33.4% for KLIC (target: $63). KLIC is the only dividend payer here at 1.08% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | COHUCohu, Inc. | KLICKulicke and Soffa… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.75 | $62.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +2.0% |
KLIC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
KLIC leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). COHU leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Best OverallKulicke and Soffa Industrie… (KLIC)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
COHU vs KLIC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is COHU or KLIC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cohu, Inc.
(COHU) is the stronger pick with 12. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC). Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC) offers the better valuation at 9999. 0x trailing P/E (35. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cohu, Inc. (COHU) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — COHU or KLIC?
On forward P/E, Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 35. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — COHU or KLIC?
Over the past 5 years, Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
(KLIC) delivered a total return of +101. 2%, compared to +31. 4% for Cohu, Inc. (COHU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KLIC returned +775. 4% versus COHU's +345. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — COHU or KLIC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
(KLIC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 87β versus Cohu, Inc. 's 2. 13β — meaning COHU is approximately 14% more volatile than KLIC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 46% for Cohu, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — COHU or KLIC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cohu, Inc.
(COHU) is pulling ahead at 12. 7% versus -7. 4% for Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. grew EPS 100. 3% year-over-year, compared to -6. 7% for Cohu, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, COHU leads at -17. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — COHU or KLIC?
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
(KLIC) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -16. 4% for Cohu, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KLIC leads at -0. 5% versus -13. 3% for COHU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KLIC leads at 42. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is COHU or KLIC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
(KLIC) trades at 35. 7x forward P/E versus 93. 2x for Cohu, Inc. — 57. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COHU: 0. 3% to $49. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — COHU or KLIC?
In this comparison, KLIC (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. COHU does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is COHU or KLIC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
(KLIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 1% yield, +775. 4% 10Y return). Cohu, Inc. (COHU) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KLIC: +775. 4%, COHU: +345. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between COHU and KLIC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
KLIC pays a dividend while COHU does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(COHU: 29.3% · KLIC: 49.8%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.